Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
National Center for Disease Control and Public Health, Tbilisi, Georgia.
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 19;17(7):e0271491. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271491. eCollection 2022.
There is little research on how financial incentives and penalties impact national cesarean section rates. In January 2018, Georgia introduced a national cesarean section reduction policy, which imposes a financial penalty on hospitals that do not meet their reduction targets. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of this policy on cesarean section rates, subgroups of women, and selected perinatal outcomes.
We included women who gave birth from 2017 to 2019 registered in the Georgian Birth Registry (n = 150 534, nearly 100% of all births in the country during this time). We then divided the time period into pre-policy (January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2017) and post-policy (January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2019). An interrupted time series analysis was used to compare the cesarean section rates (both overall and stratified by parity), neonatal intensive care unit transfer rates, and perinatal mortality rates in the two time periods. Descriptive statistics were used to assess differences in maternal socio-demographic characteristics.
The mean cesarean section rate in Georgia decreased from 44.7% in the pre-policy period to 40.8% in the post-policy period, mainly among primiparous women. The largest decrease in cesarean section births was found among women <25 years of age and those with higher education. There were no significant differences in the neonatal intensive care unit transfer rate or the perinatal mortality rate between vaginal and cesarean section births in the post-policy period.
The cesarean section rate in Georgia decreased during the 2-year post-policy period. The reduction mainly took place among primiparous women. The policy had no impact on the neonatal intensive care unit transfer rate or the perinatal mortality rate. The impact of the national cesarean section reduction policy on other outcomes is not known.
关于经济激励和处罚对全国剖宫产率的影响,研究甚少。2018 年 1 月,格鲁吉亚出台了一项剖宫产率降低政策,对未达到降低目标的医院实施经济处罚。本研究旨在评估该政策对剖宫产率、女性亚组和选定围产儿结局的影响。
我们纳入了在格鲁吉亚出生登记处注册的 2017 年至 2019 年分娩的女性(n=150534,占同期全国所有分娩的近 100%)。然后,我们将这段时间分为政策前(2017 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 12 月 31 日)和政策后(2018 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 12 月 31 日)两个阶段。采用中断时间序列分析比较两个阶段的剖宫产率(总体和按产次分层)、新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)转院率和围产儿死亡率。采用描述性统计分析评估产妇社会人口学特征的差异。
格鲁吉亚的剖宫产率从政策前的 44.7%降至政策后的 40.8%,主要发生在初产妇中。剖宫产分娩中降幅最大的是年龄<25 岁和受教育程度较高的产妇。政策后,阴道分娩与剖宫产分娩的 NICU 转院率和围产儿死亡率无显著差异。
格鲁吉亚的剖宫产率在政策实施后的 2 年内下降。这种减少主要发生在初产妇中。该政策对 NICU 转院率或围产儿死亡率没有影响。国家剖宫产率降低政策对其他结局的影响尚不清楚。