Department of Health Ethics and Society, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands;
Department of Health Ethics and Society, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Glob Health Action. 2013 Feb 13;7(1):23506. doi: 10.3402/gha.v7.23506. eCollection 2014.
The rise of the social determinants of health (SDH) discourse on the basis of statistical evidence that correlates ill health to SDH and pictures causal pathways in comprehensive theoretical frameworks led to widespread awareness that health and health disparities are the outcome of complex pathways of interconnecting SDH. In this paper we explore whether and how SDH frameworks can be translated to effectively inform particular national health policies. To this end we identified major challenges for this translation followed by reflections on ways to overcome them. Most important challenges affecting adequate translation of these frameworks into concrete policy and intervention are 1) overcoming the inclination to conceptualize SDH as mere barriers to health behavior to be modified by lifestyle interventions by addressing them as structural factors instead; 2) obtaining sufficient in-depth insight in and evidence for the exact nature of the relationship between SDs and health; 3) to adequately translate the general determinants and pathways into explanations for ill health and limited access to health care in local settings; 4) to develop and implement policies and other interventions that are adjusted to those local circumstances. We conclude that to transform generic SDH models into useful policy tools and to prevent them to transform in SDH themselves, in depth understanding of the unique interplay between local, national and global SDH in a local setting, gathered by ethnographic research, is needed to be able to address structural SD in the local setting and decrease health inequity.
健康的社会决定因素(SDH)这一概念的兴起是基于统计学证据,即不健康状况与 SDH 相关,并在综合理论框架中描绘出因果关系路径,这使得人们广泛认识到,健康和健康差距是相互关联的 SDH 复杂路径的结果。在本文中,我们探讨了 SDH 框架是否以及如何能够有效地为特定的国家卫生政策提供信息。为此,我们确定了将这些框架有效转化为具体政策和干预措施的主要挑战,随后对克服这些挑战的方法进行了反思。影响这些框架充分转化为具体政策和干预措施的最重要挑战是:1)克服将 SDH 概念化为仅仅是健康行为的障碍的倾向,而是将其视为结构性因素来加以解决;2)深入了解和充分证明 SD 与健康之间的确切关系的本质;3)充分将一般决定因素和途径转化为对当地环境中健康不良和获得医疗保健有限的解释;4)制定和实施适应当地情况的政策和其他干预措施。我们的结论是,要将通用的 SDH 模型转化为有用的政策工具,并防止它们本身转化为 SDH,需要通过民族志研究深入了解当地、国家和全球 SDH 之间独特的相互作用,以便能够解决当地环境中的结构性 SD 问题,并减少健康不平等。