Suppr超能文献

什么是健康社会?对相关概念框架的主题分析。

What Are Healthy Societies? A Thematic Analysis of Relevant Conceptual Frameworks.

作者信息

Buse Kent, Bestman Amy, Srivastava Siddharth, Marten Robert, Yangchen Sonam, Nambiar Devaki

机构信息

The George Institute for Global Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7450. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7450. Epub 2023 Nov 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

While support for the idea of fostering healthy societies is longstanding, there is a gap in the literature on what they are, how to beget them, and how experience might inform future efforts. This paper explores developments since Alma Ata (1978) to understand how a range of related concepts and fields inform approaches to healthy societies and to develop a model to help conceptualize future research and policy initiatives.

METHODS

Drawing on 68 purposively selected documents, including political declarations, commission and agency reports, peer-reviewed papers and guidance notes, we undertook qualitative thematic analysis. Three independent researchers compiled and categorised themes describing the domains of a potential healthy societies approach.

RESULTS

The literature provides numerous frameworks. Some of these frameworks promote alternative endpoints to development, eschewing short-term economic growth in favour of health, equity, well-being and sustainability. They also identify values, such as gender equality, collaboration, human rights and empowerment that provide the pathways to, or underpin, such endpoints. We categorize the literature into four "components": people; places; products; and planet. People refers to social positions, interactions and networks creating well-being. Places are physical environments-built and natural-and the interests and policies shaping them. Products are commodities and commercial practices impacting population health. Planet places human health in the context of the 'Anthropocene.' These components interact in complex ways across global, regional, country and community levels as outlined in our heuristic.

CONCLUSION

The literature offers little critical reflection on why greater progress has not been made, or on the need to organise and resist the prevailing systems which perpetuate ill-health.

摘要

背景

虽然对促进健康社会理念的支持由来已久,但关于健康社会是什么、如何培育健康社会以及经验如何为未来努力提供参考的文献存在空白。本文探讨自阿拉木图宣言(1978年)以来的发展情况,以了解一系列相关概念和领域如何为健康社会的方法提供信息,并构建一个模型来帮助构思未来的研究和政策举措。

方法

我们利用68份有目的地挑选的文件,包括政治宣言、委员会和机构报告、同行评审论文和指导说明,进行了定性主题分析。三位独立研究人员汇编并分类了描述潜在健康社会方法领域的主题。

结果

文献提供了众多框架。其中一些框架提倡发展的替代终点,摒弃短期经济增长,转而追求健康、公平、福祉和可持续性。它们还确定了一些价值观,如性别平等、协作、人权和赋权,这些价值观为实现此类终点提供了途径或支撑。我们将文献分为四个“组成部分”:人;地方;产品;和地球。人指的是创造福祉的社会地位、互动和网络。地方是建成环境和自然环境以及塑造它们的利益和政策。产品是影响人口健康的商品和商业行为。地球将人类健康置于“人类世”的背景下。正如我们的启发式方法所概述的,这些组成部分在全球、区域、国家和社区层面以复杂的方式相互作用。

结论

文献很少对为何没有取得更大进展进行批判性反思,也很少反思组织和抵制使健康不佳状况长期存在的现行体系的必要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1017/10699824/33cf23e3af97/ijhpm-12-7450-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验