Peled Einat S, Newman Zachary L, Isacoff Ehud Y
Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, 271 Life Sciences Addition, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, 271 Life Sciences Addition, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA; Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, 450 Li Ka Shing Biomedical Center, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA; Physical Bioscience Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Curr Biol. 2014 Mar 3;24(5):484-93. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.01.022. Epub 2014 Feb 20.
Spontaneous "miniature" transmitter release takes place at low rates at all synapses. Long thought of as an unavoidable leak, spontaneous release has recently been suggested to be mediated by distinct pre- and postsynaptic molecular machineries and to have a specialized role in setting up and adjusting neuronal circuits. It remains unclear how spontaneous and evoked transmission are related at individual synapses, how they are distributed spatially when an axon makes multiple contacts with a target, and whether they are commonly regulated.
Electrophysiological recordings in the Drosophila larval neuromuscular junction, in the presence of the use-dependent glutamate receptor (GluR) blocker philanthotoxin, indicated that spontaneous and evoked transmission employ distinct sets of GluRs. In vivo imaging of transmission using synaptically targeted GCaMP3 to detect Ca(2+) influx through the GluRs revealed little spatial overlap between synapses participating in spontaneous and evoked transmission. Spontaneous and evoked transmission were oppositely correlated with presynaptic levels of the protein Brp: synapses with high Brp favored evoked transmission, whereas synapses with low Brp were more active spontaneously. High-frequency stimulation did not increase the overlap between evoked and spontaneous transmission, and instead decreased the rate of spontaneous release from synapses that were highly active in evoked transmission.
Although individual synapses can participate in both evoked and spontaneous transmission, highly active synapses show a preference for one mode of transmission. The presynaptic protein Brp promotes evoked transmission and suppresses spontaneous release. These findings suggest the existence of presynaptic mechanisms that promote synaptic specialization to either evoked or spontaneous transmission.
所有突触均会以较低频率发生自发性“微型”递质释放。长期以来,自发性释放一直被视为一种不可避免的泄漏,但最近有人提出,它是由不同的突触前和突触后分子机制介导的,并且在建立和调节神经回路中具有特殊作用。目前尚不清楚在单个突触中,自发性传递和诱发传递是如何关联的;当轴突与靶标进行多次接触时,它们在空间上是如何分布的;以及它们是否受到共同调节。
在存在使用依赖性谷氨酸受体(GluR)阻断剂 philanthotoxin 的情况下,对果蝇幼虫神经肌肉接头进行电生理记录,结果表明自发性传递和诱发传递使用不同的 GluR 组合。利用突触靶向的 GCaMP3 对传递过程进行体内成像,以检测通过 GluR 的 Ca(2+) 内流,结果显示参与自发性传递和诱发传递的突触之间几乎没有空间重叠。自发性传递和诱发传递与蛋白质 Brp 的突触前水平呈相反的相关性:Brp 水平高的突触有利于诱发传递,而 Brp 水平低的突触自发性活动更强。高频刺激并未增加诱发传递和自发性传递之间的重叠,反而降低了在诱发传递中高度活跃的突触的自发性释放速率。
虽然单个突触可以同时参与诱发传递和自发性传递,但高度活跃的突触表现出对一种传递模式的偏好。突触前蛋白 Brp 促进诱发传递并抑制自发性释放。这些发现表明存在促进突触特化至诱发传递或自发性传递的突触前机制。