Portnoy David B, Kaufman Annette R, Klein William M P, Doyle Todd A, de Groot Mary
National Cancer Institute, Behavioral Research Program ; National Cancer Institute, Cancer Prevention Fellowship Program.
National Cancer Institute, Behavioral Research Program.
J Risk Res. 2014 Jan 1;17(2):177-193. doi: 10.1080/13669877.2013.794153.
Most conventional measures of risk perception such as perceived likelihood address largely deliberative or cognitive perceptions of vulnerability. Nevertheless, perceptions of vulnerability such as worry may have different antecedents and consequences than do these conventional measures, serve as stronger predictors of behavior, and qualify effects of conventional deliberative risk perceptions on behavior. In this study, we assessed how worry - the most common measure of affective perceptions of vulnerability compared with three conventional measures of risk (absolute risk, comparative risk, and conditional risk) in predicting behavioral intentions. Participants were 83 adults with type 2 diabetes who assessed their risk of heart disease and reported their intentions to increase physical activity (which reduces heart disease risk). As predicted, worry was the only significant predictor of exercise intentions such that higher worry was associated with higher intentions. Importantly, this relationship was stronger among individuals who perceived their absolute risk to be relatively higher and those who perceived their comparative risk to be relatively lower, demonstrating that cognitive and affective perceptions interact. These findings highlight the importance of not conflating affective and cognitive perceptions of vulnerability when assessing perceived risk, and suggest the need for more research on how to best conceptualize perceived risk in different samples and settings.
大多数传统的风险认知测量方法,如感知可能性,主要涉及对脆弱性的审慎或认知感知。然而,诸如担忧等对脆弱性的感知可能与这些传统测量方法有着不同的前因和后果,能更有力地预测行为,并限定传统审慎风险认知对行为的影响。在本研究中,我们评估了担忧(与三种传统风险测量方法:绝对风险、比较风险和条件风险相比,它是对脆弱性的情感感知的最常见测量方法)在预测行为意图方面的情况。参与者是83名2型糖尿病成年人,他们评估了自己患心脏病的风险,并报告了增加身体活动(这可降低心脏病风险)的意图。正如预期的那样,担忧是锻炼意图的唯一显著预测因素,即担忧程度越高,意图越高。重要的是,这种关系在那些认为自己绝对风险相对较高的人和那些认为自己比较风险相对较低的人当中更强,表明认知和情感感知相互作用。这些发现凸显了在评估感知风险时不将对脆弱性的情感和认知感知混为一谈的重要性,并表明需要更多研究如何在不同样本和环境中最好地概念化感知风险。