Department of Work and Social Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University , Maastricht , The Netherlands.
Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis , St. Louis , MO , USA.
Psychol Health. 2019 Nov;34(11):1294-1313. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2019.1604954. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
The role of affectively oriented risk beliefs in explaining health behaviors has not been examined in the context of physical activity or in diverse study populations. We evaluated whether affective risk beliefs account for unique variance in physical activity intentions and behavior above and beyond that accounted for by cognitive risk beliefs. A cross-sectional survey of socio-demographically diverse US residents ( = 835; 46.4% no college training; 46.7% minority racial/ethnic ancestry; 42.6% men). Physical activity intentions and behavior. Hierarchical linear regressions showed that affective risk beliefs accounted for variance in physical activity intentions beyond that predicted by socio-demographics and cognitive risk beliefs (-change s<.001). Specifically, intentions were higher among people with higher anticipated regret (s<.001) and with higher absolute feelings of risk (s<.05) or worry (s<.05). There was an indirect relationship between perceived absolute likelihood and intentions through anticipated regret and feelings of risk. Neither cognitive nor affective risk beliefs accounted for variance in physical activity behavior (-change s>.05), but unsurprisingly, behavior was positively associated with physical activity intentions (<.001). Future interventions could target affective risk beliefs-particularly anticipated regret-to increase intentions, and then add other intervention components to bridge the intention-behavior gap.
在身体活动或不同研究人群的背景下,情感导向风险信念在解释健康行为方面的作用尚未得到检验。我们评估了情感风险信念是否可以在认知风险信念之外,对身体活动意向和行为的差异做出独特的解释。这是一项针对美国社会人口统计学多样化居民的横断面调查( = 835;46.4%没有大学培训;46.7%少数族裔/种族背景;42.6%男性)。身体活动意向和行为。分层线性回归显示,情感风险信念可以解释身体活动意向的差异,超出了社会人口统计学和认知风险信念的预测范围(变化 s<.001)。具体来说,预期后悔(s<.001)、绝对风险(s<.05)或担忧(s<.05)较高的人,意向更高。感知的绝对可能性与通过预期后悔和风险感之间存在间接关系。认知和情感风险信念都不能解释身体活动行为的差异(变化 s>.05),但毫不奇怪,行为与身体活动意向呈正相关(<.001)。未来的干预措施可以针对情感风险信念——特别是预期后悔——来增加意向,然后添加其他干预措施来弥合意向与行为之间的差距。