Milner P G, Dimarco J P, Lerman B B
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville 22908.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1988 May;11(5):562-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1988.tb04551.x.
Sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias and sudden death are particularly prevalent in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDC). In contrast to patients with ischemic heart disease, the value of electrophysiological stimulation (EPS) in patients with IDC has not yet been established. To clarify the role of EPS in these patients, we studied 19 patients (58 +/- 11 years) with IDC who had symptomatic ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF). The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 26 +/- 9%. Ten patients had survived out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, eight had documented sustained monomorphic VT and one patient had non-sustained VT associated with syncope. Thirteen of the 19 patients (68%) had their clinical ventricular tachyarrhythmias induced at EPS (12 VT, 1 VF). In nine of 13 patients (69%), the arrhythmias were subsequently suppressed during serial electrophysiological drug testing. During 17 +/- 11 months of follow-up, 10/19 (53%) patients experienced recurrence of their arrhythmias and nine out of 19 (47%) patients died; six died suddenly and three secondary to heart failure. There was no difference in arrhythmia recurrence between patients with and without inducible ventricular tachyarrhythmias at initial study. Furthermore, suppression of arrhythmia during serial testing did not predict outcome; recurrences were observed in five out of nine patients whose arrhythmias were suppressed.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
持续性室性快速性心律失常和猝死在特发性扩张型心肌病(IDC)患者中尤为常见。与缺血性心脏病患者不同,电生理刺激(EPS)在IDC患者中的价值尚未确定。为了阐明EPS在这些患者中的作用,我们研究了19例(58±11岁)有症状性室性心动过速(VT)或室颤(VF)的IDC患者。平均左心室射血分数为26±9%。10例患者曾发生院外心脏骤停后存活,8例有持续性单形性VT记录,1例患者有与晕厥相关的非持续性VT。19例患者中有13例(68%)在EPS时诱发出临床室性快速性心律失常(12例VT,1例VF)。13例患者中有9例(69%)在系列电生理药物测试期间心律失常随后被抑制。在17±11个月的随访期间,19例患者中有10例(53%)心律失常复发,19例患者中有9例(47%)死亡;6例猝死,3例死于心力衰竭。初始研究时可诱发性室性快速性心律失常患者和无诱发性室性快速性心律失常患者之间的心律失常复发无差异。此外,系列测试期间心律失常的抑制并不能预测预后;9例心律失常被抑制的患者中有5例出现复发。(摘要截短于250字)