Barold S S, Falkoff M D, Ong L S, Heinle R A, Willis J E
Department of Medicine, Genesee Hospital, Rochester, New York.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1988 Jun;11(6 Pt 1):736-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1988.tb06024.x.
We encountered resetting of three DDD pulse generators to the VVI mode, one at the time of implantation and two others just before implantation, and we believe this resulted from cold exposure during shipment. Consequently we analyzed the effect of cold exposure on five lithium-powered DDD pulse generators from different manufacturers. Cold exposure caused resetting of three of the five DDD pulse generators to the VVI mode. Only one of the reset pulse generators responded to application of the magnet by conversion to the asynchronous (VOO) mode, while the other two remained in the VVI mode. All DDD pulse generators should be routinely interrogated before implantation. If found to be reset, the likelihood of cold exposure is very high and the pulse generator can generally be reprogrammed to the DDD mode. The absence of a magnet response in reset DDD pulse generators appropriately inhibited and functioning in the VVI mode should not be interpreted as component failure when no output is observed.
我们遇到了三台DDD脉冲发生器重置为VVI模式的情况,一台发生在植入时,另外两台发生在植入前,我们认为这是运输过程中受冷暴露导致的。因此,我们分析了冷暴露对来自不同制造商的五台锂供电DDD脉冲发生器的影响。冷暴露导致五台DDD脉冲发生器中的三台重置为VVI模式。在重置的脉冲发生器中,只有一台在施加磁铁后转换为异步(VOO)模式,而另外两台仍保持在VVI模式。所有DDD脉冲发生器在植入前都应常规进行询问。如果发现已重置,冷暴露的可能性非常高,并且通常可以将脉冲发生器重新编程为DDD模式。当在VVI模式下适当抑制且功能正常的重置DDD脉冲发生器没有观察到输出时,没有磁铁响应不应被解释为部件故障。