Lee Chae-Woo, Hwangbo Kak, Lee In-Sil
Department of Rehabilitation Science, Graduate School, Daegu University, Republic of Korea.
Department of Physical Therapy, College of Rehabilitation Science, Daegu University, Republic of Korea.
J Phys Ther Sci. 2014 Jan;26(1):93-6. doi: 10.1589/jpts.26.93. Epub 2014 Feb 6.
[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to compare two methods for the muscle stabilization of the trunk of patients with chronic low back pain. The methods comprised combination patterns of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) and ball exercise. [Subjects and Methods] The subjects were 40 volunteers who had low back pain. All subjects were randomly assigned to either a group which received proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation or a group which performed ball exercise. Measurements were taken four times in total, at pre-intervention, two weeks later, four weeks later, and six weeks later. The main measurement methods used were the visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain and electromyography (EMG) for muscle activity. [Results] VAS and EMG activity were significantly reduced in the PNF combination pattern group and the ball exercise group. A comparison of the groups showed significant differences. In VAS and EMG activity; in particular, the combination pattern group using PNF increased EMG activity more than the ball exercise group did after six weeks of intervention. [Conclusion] This study showed that PNF combination pattern training for six weeks was more effective for patients with low back pain than performing ball exercise.
[目的] 本研究旨在比较两种针对慢性下腰痛患者躯干肌肉稳定的方法。这些方法包括本体感觉神经肌肉促进法(PNF)和球上运动的组合模式。[对象与方法] 研究对象为40名患有下腰痛的志愿者。所有受试者被随机分为接受本体感觉神经肌肉促进法的组或进行球上运动的组。总共进行了四次测量,分别在干预前、两周后、四周后和六周后。主要的测量方法是用于疼痛的视觉模拟量表(VAS)和用于肌肉活动的肌电图(EMG)。[结果] PNF组合模式组和球上运动组的VAS和EMG活动均显著降低。两组之间的比较显示出显著差异。在VAS和EMG活动方面;特别是,在干预六周后,使用PNF的组合模式组比球上运动组更能增加EMG活动。[结论] 本研究表明,为期六周的PNF组合模式训练对下腰痛患者比进行球上运动更有效。