• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜单孔全子宫切除术的比较:带有部分阴道操作的腹腔镜全子宫切除术与腹腔镜辅助阴式全子宫切除术。

Comparison of laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomies: laparoscopic hysterectomy with some vaginal component versus laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy.

作者信息

Kim Tae-Joong, Song Taejong, Choi Chel Hun, Lee Jeong-Won, Bae Duk-Soo, Kim Byoung-Gie

机构信息

1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine , Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2014 Apr;24(4):254-9. doi: 10.1089/lap.2013.0507. Epub 2014 Feb 25.

DOI:10.1089/lap.2013.0507
PMID:24568539
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To compare the clinical results of two types of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH): LH with some vaginal component [LH(a)] versus laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH).

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective comparative study. A single surgeon performed 50 LESS-LAVH procedures consecutively between March 2009 and October 2009 and 50 LESS-LH(a) procedures consecutively between January 2011 and July 2011.

RESULTS

Most LESS-LH(a)s/LAVH procedures were successful. Of 50 LESS-LH(a) procedures, 2 were converted to LESS-LAVH. Of 50 LESS-LAVHs, 1 required additional ports. The LESS-LH(a) group had a shorter operative time and less postoperative pain compared with the LESS-LAVH group. Operative complications were not significantly different between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

LESS-LH(a) and LESS-LAVH are both feasible and safe methods, with similar surgical outcomes. In terms of operative time and postoperative pain, LESS-LH(a) is superior to LESS-LAVH.

摘要

背景

比较两种腹腔镜单孔手术(LESS)式腹腔镜子宫切除术(LH)的临床结果:含部分经阴道操作的LH[LH(a)]与腹腔镜辅助经阴道子宫切除术(LAVH)。

研究对象与方法

这是一项回顾性对照研究。同一位外科医生于2009年3月至2009年10月间连续实施了50例LESS-LAVH手术,并于2011年1月至2011年7月间连续实施了50例LESS-LH(a)手术。

结果

大多数LESS-LH(a)/LAVH手术成功。在50例LESS-LH(a)手术中,2例转为LESS-LAVH手术。在50例LESS-LAVH手术中,1例需要增加辅助端口。与LESS-LAVH组相比,LESS-LH(a)组手术时间更短,术后疼痛更轻。两组间手术并发症无显著差异。

结论

LESS-LH(a)和LESS-LAVH都是可行且安全的方法,手术结果相似。在手术时间和术后疼痛方面,LESS-LH(a)优于LESS-LAVH。

相似文献

1
Comparison of laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomies: laparoscopic hysterectomy with some vaginal component versus laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy.腹腔镜单孔全子宫切除术的比较:带有部分阴道操作的腹腔镜全子宫切除术与腹腔镜辅助阴式全子宫切除术。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2014 Apr;24(4):254-9. doi: 10.1089/lap.2013.0507. Epub 2014 Feb 25.
2
A Randomized Comparison of Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Hysterectomies: Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Versus Laparoscopically Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy.腹腔镜单孔子宫切除术的随机对照比较:全腹腔镜子宫切除术与腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2015 Jul;25(7):541-7. doi: 10.1089/lap.2014.0524. Epub 2015 Jun 15.
3
Randomized comparison of total laparoscopic, laparoscopically assisted vaginal and vaginal hysterectomies for myomatous uteri.子宫肌瘤患者行全腹腔镜、腹腔镜辅助阴式和阴式子宫切除术的随机对照比较。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014 Sep;290(3):485-91. doi: 10.1007/s00404-014-3228-2. Epub 2014 Apr 8.
4
Less postoperative pain after laparoscopic hysterectomy than after vaginal hysterectomy.腹腔镜子宫切除术术后疼痛少于阴道子宫切除术。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015 Jul;292(1):149-54. doi: 10.1007/s00404-014-3608-7. Epub 2014 Dec 31.
5
The impact of obesity on vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopically-assisted vaginal hysterectomy outcomes: A randomised control trial.肥胖对经阴道子宫切除术和腹腔镜辅助经阴道子宫切除术结局的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2023 Aug;287:227-231. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.06.001. Epub 2023 Jun 5.
6
Vaginal hysterectomy versus laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy for large uteri between 280 and 700 g: a randomized controlled trial.280至700克大子宫行阴道子宫切除术与腹腔镜辅助阴道子宫切除术的比较:一项随机对照试验
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017 Jul;296(1):77-83. doi: 10.1007/s00404-017-4397-6. Epub 2017 May 15.
7
Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery-assisted versus single-port laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a case-matched study.经自然腔道内镜手术辅助与单孔腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术的病例匹配研究。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 Jul-Aug;21(4):624-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.01.005. Epub 2014 Jan 21.
8
Laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy for benign or pre-invasive uterine disease.腹腔镜单孔手术与传统腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术治疗良性或癌前子宫疾病的比较
Surg Endosc. 2015 Apr;29(4):890-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3747-8. Epub 2014 Aug 9.
9
A comparative study between laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy.腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术与腹式子宫切除术的比较研究。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2007 May;90(5):837-43.
10
Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.良性妇科疾病子宫切除术的手术入路
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Apr 19(2):CD003677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub3.