Ahrberg Annette B, Leimcke Benjamin, Tiemann Andreas H, Josten Christoph, Fakler Johannes Km
Department of Orthopedics, Traumatology and Plastic Surgery, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Patient Saf Surg. 2014 Feb 25;8(1):10. doi: 10.1186/1754-9493-8-10.
Missed foot fractures are a known problem in the care of the traumatized patient. They do not usually have an influence on the survival, but on the long-term result and the quality of the patient's life. The aim of this study is to find out how many of these fractures are overlooked in a Level I trauma center and what the consequences for the patients are hypothesing that patients with a delayed diagnosis will have worse clinical results.
Forty-seven patients (7.3%) with foot fractures could be identified in 642 polytrauma patients, retrospectively. All patients were divided into two groups: early diagnosed fractures and delayed diagnosed fractures, the latter defined as diagnosed after Secondary Survey. Patients were evaluated according to the Hannover Outcome Score, the Short Form-36 Health Survey, the AOFAS Score and the Hannover Scoring System. The average follow-up was 5 years and 8 months. Reasons for overlooking a foot fracture were analyzed.
The foot fracture was early diagnosed in 26 (55.3%) patients, but delayed in 21 (44.7%). There were no significant differences in the mean stay in the hospital or in the ICU. The fractures that were most often missed were those of the cuboid or the metarsalia. The highest risk factor for a delayed diagnosis was a fracture already diagnosed on the same foot. In 52.4% of the delayed diagosed fractures, an operative therapy was necessary. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the clinical results.
In summary, the results of this study show that foot injuries can be a safety problem for the patient and the examination of the feet in the trauma room has to be a compulsory part of the algorithm. Although the majority of delayed diagnosed foot fractures demonstrated comparable results to the immediately diagnosed fractures, approximately 10% might have benefited from an earlier diagnosis. Even if there were no significant differences in the clinical results, we have to be aware that missing a fracture in the foot can lead to worse results in the complete polytrauma care.
漏诊足部骨折是创伤患者护理中一个已知的问题。它们通常对患者的生存没有影响,但会影响长期预后和患者的生活质量。本研究的目的是查明在一级创伤中心有多少此类骨折被漏诊,以及对患者有何后果,并假设延迟诊断的患者临床结果会更差。
回顾性分析642例多发伤患者,其中47例(7.3%)有足部骨折。所有患者分为两组:早期诊断骨折组和延迟诊断骨折组,后者定义为在二次检查后确诊。根据汉诺威结果评分、简短健康调查问卷-36、美国足踝外科协会(AOFAS)评分和汉诺威评分系统对患者进行评估。平均随访时间为5年8个月。分析漏诊足部骨折的原因。
26例(55.3%)患者的足部骨折得到早期诊断,21例(44.7%)患者延迟诊断。两组患者的平均住院时间或在重症监护病房的时间无显著差异。最常漏诊的骨折是骰骨或跖骨骨折。延迟诊断的最高风险因素是同一只脚已诊断出骨折。在52.4%的延迟诊断骨折中,需要进行手术治疗。两组的临床结果无显著差异。
总之,本研究结果表明足部损伤可能对患者构成安全问题,创伤室对足部的检查必须是诊疗流程中的一个必要部分。虽然大多数延迟诊断的足部骨折与立即诊断的骨折结果相当,但约10%的患者可能会从早期诊断中获益。即使临床结果没有显著差异,我们也必须意识到漏诊足部骨折可能会导致多发伤整体护理的结果更差。