Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Eur Heart J. 2014 Jul 21;35(28):1856-63. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu048. Epub 2014 Feb 25.
The AVERROES double-blinded, randomized trial demonstrated that apixaban reduces the risk of stroke or systemic embolism (SSE) by 55% compared with aspirin without an increase in major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation either who previously tried but failed vitamin K antagonists (VKA) therapy or who were expected to be unsuitable for VKA therapy. In this pre-specified analysis, we explored the consistency of the results in the subgroup of patients who tried but failed VKA therapy.
Of 5599 patients, 2216 (40%) had previously failed VKA treatment [main reasons: poor international normalized ratio (INR) control 42%, refusal 37%, bleeding on VKA 8%]. Compared with those expected to be unsuitable for VKA therapy, those who had previously failed were older, more often male, had higher body mass index, more likely to have moderate renal impairment and a history of stroke and less likely to have heart failure or to be medically undertreated. The effects of apixaban compared with aspirin were consistent in those who previously failed and those who were expected to be unsuitable, for both SSE (P interaction 0.13) and major bleeding (P interaction 0.74) and were also consistent among different subgroups of patients who had previously failed VKA therapy defined by reasons for unsuitability, age, sex, renal function, CHADS2 score, aspirin dose, duration, indication, and quality of INR control of prior VKA use.
The efficacy and safety of apixaban compared with aspirin is consistent in subgroups of patients who have previously attempted but failed VKA therapy, irrespective of the reason for discontinuation.
AVERROES 双盲、随机试验表明,与阿司匹林相比,阿哌沙班可使房颤患者发生中风或全身性栓塞(SSE)的风险降低 55%,而不会增加大出血风险,这些患者此前尝试过但未能耐受维生素 K 拮抗剂(VKA)治疗,或预计不适合 VKA 治疗。在这项预先指定的分析中,我们探讨了在尝试但未能耐受 VKA 治疗的亚组患者中结果的一致性。
在 5599 例患者中,有 2216 例(40%)既往曾接受过 VKA 治疗失败[主要原因:INR 控制不佳 42%,拒绝 37%,VKA 出血 8%]。与预计不适合 VKA 治疗的患者相比,那些曾接受过 VKA 治疗失败的患者年龄更大、更常为男性、体重指数更高、更可能有中度肾功能损害和中风史,且心力衰竭和治疗不足的可能性更小。与预计不适合 VKA 治疗的患者相比,阿哌沙班与阿司匹林相比,在 SSE(P 交互作用 0.13)和大出血(P 交互作用 0.74)方面的效果一致,并且在因不适合、年龄、性别、肾功能、CHADS2 评分、阿司匹林剂量、持续时间、适应证和先前 VKA 使用的 INR 控制质量等原因而停用 VKA 的不同亚组患者中也一致。
阿哌沙班与阿司匹林相比,在既往尝试但未能耐受 VKA 治疗的患者亚组中,疗效和安全性一致,与停药原因无关。