Chang Wan-Chi, Yen Catherine, Wu Fang-Tzy, Huang Yhu-Chering, Lin Jen-Shiou, Huang Fu-Chen, Yu Hui-Tzu, Chi Cheng-Liang, Lin Han-Ying, Tate Jacqueline E, Parashar Umesh D, Wu Ho-Sheng, Hsiung Chao A
From the *Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Institute of Population Health Sciences, National Health Research Institutes, Zhunan, Taiwan; †Division of Viral Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA; ‡Department of Health, Research and Diagnostic Center, Centers for Disease Control, Taipei; §Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan; ¶Department of Laboratory Medicine, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua; ‖Department of Pediatrics, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung; and **School of Medical Laboratory Science and Biotechnology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2014 Mar;33(3):e81-6. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000000105.
Two rotavirus (RV) vaccines (Rotarix and RotaTeq) are available on the private market in Taiwan, but are not recommended for routine use. We examined RV vaccine effectiveness (VE) against severe RV acute gastroenteritis (AGE) among Taiwanese infants to inform policymakers on the potential benefits of national RV vaccine introduction.
From May 2009 to April 2011, a case-control assessment of VE against severe RV AGE was conducted at 3 hospital-based surveillance sites in Taiwan. Case-patients included children aged 8-35 months, hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed RV AGE. Controls included children age-matched within 1 month of age of the case-patient, hospitalized with RV-negative AGE or seen for non-AGE illnesses at the same hospitals. Vaccination history was confirmed through vaccination card or hospital record review. VE was calculated as (1--odds ratio of vaccination) × 100%.
We enrolled 184 case-patients with RV AGE, 904 RV-negative AGE and 909 non-AGE controls. Two-dose Rotarix series VE against RV gastroenteritis hospitalization was 90.4% [95% confidence interval (CI): 70.3%, 98.1%) and 92.5% (95% CI: 77.1%, 98.5%) with RV-negative AGE and non-AGE controls, respectively. Three-dose RotaTeq series VE was 96.8% (95% CI: 82.3%, 100%) and 97.1% (95% CI: 84%, 100%) with RV-negative AGE and non-AGE controls, respectively.
Both vaccines provided excellent protection against severe RV AGE hospitalization. Addition of RV vaccination into Taiwan's National Immunization Program could substantially decrease AGE hospitalizations among children <3 years. Our findings should help inform policymakers in Taiwan and other similar Asian countries when deciding whether to include RV vaccination into their national immunization programs.
两种轮状病毒(RV)疫苗(Rotarix和RotaTeq)在台湾的私立市场上有售,但不建议常规使用。我们研究了台湾婴儿中RV疫苗对严重RV急性胃肠炎(AGE)的有效性(VE),以便为政策制定者提供有关引入国家RV疫苗潜在益处的信息。
2009年5月至2011年4月,在台湾的3个基于医院的监测点对RV疫苗针对严重RV AGE的有效性进行了病例对照评估。病例患者包括8至35个月大、因实验室确诊的RV AGE住院的儿童。对照包括与病例患者年龄相差1个月以内的年龄匹配儿童,他们因RV阴性AGE住院或在同一家医院因非AGE疾病就诊。通过疫苗接种卡或医院记录审查确认疫苗接种史。VE计算为(1 - 接种疫苗的比值比)×100%。
我们纳入了184例RV AGE病例患者、904例RV阴性AGE患者和909例非AGE对照。两剂Rotarix系列疫苗对RV胃肠炎住院的VE,以RV阴性AGE患者为对照时为90.4% [95%置信区间(CI):70.3%,98.1%],以非AGE对照时为92.5%(95% CI:77.1%,98.5%)。三剂RotaTeq系列疫苗的VE,以RV阴性AGE患者为对照时为96.8%(95% CI:82.3%,100%),以非AGE对照时为97.1%(95% CI:84%,100%)。
两种疫苗均对严重RV AGE住院提供了出色的保护。将RV疫苗纳入台湾的国家免疫规划可大幅减少3岁以下儿童的AGE住院率。我们的研究结果应有助于台湾和其他类似亚洲国家的政策制定者在决定是否将RV疫苗纳入其国家免疫规划时提供参考。