Suppr超能文献

美国的鼻烟使用与抵制情况。

Snus use and rejection in the USA.

作者信息

Biener Lois, Roman Anthony M, Mc Inerney Scott A, Bolcic-Jankovic Dragana, Hatsukami Dororthy K, Loukas Alexandra, O'Connor Richard J, Romito Laura

机构信息

Center for Survey Research, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

出版信息

Tob Control. 2016 Jul;25(4):386-92. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051342. Epub 2014 Feb 25.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether snus might become a strategy for reducing the harm associated with cigarette smoking in the USA as appears to be the case in Sweden, we examined receptivity to snus use in two cities with the greatest exposure to the major brands.

METHODS

A dual frame, telephone survey and a brief mail survey were conducted in 2011 and 2012 in Indianapolis, Indiana and Dallas/Fort Worth Texas. Over 5000 adults completed surveys. Trial, ever use, current use and reasons for using or quitting snus after trial were measured.

RESULTS

Among male smokers, 29.9% had ever tried snus (CI 22.7 to 38.1) and 4.2% were current users (CI 1.6 to 10.7). Among female smokers, 8.5% ever tried snus (CI 4.4 to 15.7) and current use was unknown. Current use was virtually absent among former smokers and never smokers. A major predictor of any level of snus use was current use of conventional smokeless tobacco. Those who tried and gave up snus cited curiosity (41.3%) and the fact that it was available at low or no cost (30%) as reasons for trial; reasons for not continuing included preferring another form of tobacco (75.1%) and disliking the mouth feel (34.6%). Almost all current snus users indicated that they were trying to cut down on cigarettes, but few (3.9%) were using it to quit smoking entirely.

CONCLUSIONS

The low rate of adoption of snus suggests that neither the hopes nor the fears surrounding this new product are likely to be realised in the USA with the current marketing patterns.

摘要

目的

为了确定在美国鼻烟是否会像在瑞典那样成为一种减少与吸烟相关危害的策略,我们在两个受主要品牌影响最大的城市调查了对鼻烟使用的接受程度。

方法

2011年和2012年在印第安纳州印第安纳波利斯市以及得克萨斯州达拉斯/沃思堡市进行了双框架电话调查和简短邮件调查。超过5000名成年人完成了调查。测量了试用情况、曾经使用情况、当前使用情况以及试用后使用或停止使用鼻烟的原因。

结果

在男性吸烟者中,29.9%曾经试用过鼻烟(置信区间为22.7%至38.1%),4.2%为当前使用者(置信区间为1.6%至10.7%)。在女性吸烟者中,8.5%曾经试用过鼻烟(置信区间为4.4%至15.7%),当前使用情况未知。在曾经吸烟者和从不吸烟者中几乎没有当前使用者。任何程度的鼻烟使用的一个主要预测因素是当前使用传统无烟烟草。那些试用并停止使用鼻烟的人提到好奇(41.3%)以及鼻烟价格低廉或免费可得(30%)是试用的原因;不继续使用的原因包括更喜欢另一种烟草形式(75.1%)和不喜欢口腔感觉(34.6%)。几乎所有当前的鼻烟使用者表示他们试图减少吸烟量,但很少有人(3.9%)用它来完全戒烟。

结论

鼻烟的低采用率表明,就当前的营销模式而言,围绕这种新产品的希望和担忧在美国都不太可能实现。

相似文献

1
Snus use and rejection in the USA.美国的鼻烟使用与抵制情况。
Tob Control. 2016 Jul;25(4):386-92. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051342. Epub 2014 Feb 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of modified risk claim advertising formats for Camel Snus.骆驼鼻烟改良风险声明广告形式的评估。
Health Educ J. 2017 Dec;76(8):971-985. doi: 10.1177/0017896917729723. Epub 2017 Sep 20.

本文引用的文献

2
Use of emerging tobacco products in the United States.美国新兴烟草制品的使用情况。
J Environ Public Health. 2012;2012:989474. doi: 10.1155/2012/989474. Epub 2012 May 10.
3
Has Marlboro hijacked tobacco harm reduction?万宝路是否劫持了烟草危害降低策略?
Addiction. 2012 Jun;107(6):1029-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03748.x. Epub 2012 Feb 11.
4
Prevalence of trial of snus products among adult smokers.成年吸烟者使用鼻烟产品的情况。
Am J Public Health. 2011 Oct;101(10):1874-6. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2010.200097. Epub 2011 Feb 17.
5
Harm reduction policies for tobacco users.减少烟草使用者危害的政策。
Int J Drug Policy. 2010 Mar;21(2):129-30. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2009.10.008. Epub 2009 Nov 26.
7
Receptivity to Taboka and Camel Snus in a U.S. test market.美国一个测试市场对Taboka和骆驼鼻烟的接受度。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2009 Oct;11(10):1154-9. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntp113. Epub 2009 Jun 29.
10
Swedish snus for tobacco harm reduction.用于减少烟草危害的瑞典口含烟
Lancet. 2007 Oct 6;370(9594):1206; author reply 1206-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61530-X.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验