Chan Siu Mui, Chan Sau Kam, Kwok Wai Wai
Department of Psychological Studies, Hong Kong Institute of Education, 10 Lo Ping Road, Tai Po, Hong Kong,
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2015 Feb;46(1):57-66. doi: 10.1007/s10578-014-0451-9.
This study assessed rumination, catastrophizing and daily hassles as predictors of anxiety when controlling for depressive symptoms in a community sample of adolescents reporting high anxiety. Adolescents aged 12-18 (N = 2,802, mean age of 14.9) completed the Screen For Child Anxiety-Related Emotional Disorders. With a total score of 30 as the cutoff, a group of high anxiety adolescents was identified (a prevalence rate of 28.02%). Path analyses results showed that amongst the high anxiety boys, catastrophizing but not rumination was a positive predictor of anxiety and it mediated the effects of daily hassles on anxiety. In the high anxiety girls, both rumination and catastrophizing predicted anxiety but only catastrophizing was the mediator between daily hassles and anxiety. It is suggested that such gender differences in cognitive responses styles should be considered in cognitive-behavioral therapeutic approaches designed to help adolescents showing high anxiety.
本研究在一个报告高度焦虑的青少年社区样本中,在控制抑郁症状的情况下,评估了沉思、灾难化思维和日常烦恼作为焦虑预测因素的情况。12至18岁的青少年(N = 2802,平均年龄14.9岁)完成了儿童焦虑相关情绪障碍筛查。以总分30分为临界值,确定了一组高度焦虑的青少年(患病率为28.02%)。路径分析结果显示,在高度焦虑的男孩中,灾难化思维而非沉思是焦虑的正向预测因素,并且它介导了日常烦恼对焦虑的影响。在高度焦虑的女孩中,沉思和灾难化思维都能预测焦虑,但只有灾难化思维是日常烦恼和焦虑之间的中介因素。建议在旨在帮助表现出高度焦虑的青少年的认知行为治疗方法中,应考虑这种认知反应风格的性别差异。