Cong Qian, Grishin Nick V
Howard Hughes Medical Institute.
Howard Hughes Medical Institute ; Departments of Biophysics and Biochemistry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX, USA 75390-9050.
Zookeys. 2014 Feb 12(379):43-91. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.379.6394. eCollection 2014.
Hermeuptychia intricata Grishin, sp. n. is described from the Brazos Bend State Park in Texas, United States, where it flies synchronously with Hermeuptychia sosybius (Fabricius, 1793). The two species differ strongly in both male and female genitalia and exhibit 3.5% difference in the COI barcode sequence of mitochondrial DNA. Setting such significant genitalic and genotypic differences aside, we were not able to find reliable wing pattern characters to tell a difference between the two species. This superficial similarity may explain why H. intricata, only distantly related to H. sosybius, has remained unnoticed until now, despite being widely distributed in the coastal plains from South Carolina to Texas, USA (and possibly to Costa Rica). Obscuring the presence of a cryptic species even further, wing patterns are variable in both butterflies and ventral eyespots vary from large to almost absent. To avoid confusion with the new species, neotype for Papilio sosybius Fabricius, 1793, a common butterfly that occurs across northeast US, is designated from Savannah, Georgia, USA. It secures the universally accepted traditional usage of this name. Furthermore, we find that DNA barcodes of Hermeuptychia specimens from the US, even those from extreme south Texas, are at least 4% different from those of H. hermes (Fabricius, 1775)-type locality Brazil: Rio de Janeiro-and suggest that the name H. hermes should not be used for USA populations, but rather reserved for the South American species. This conclusion is further supported by comparison of male genitalia. However, facies, genitalia and 2.1% different DNA barcodes set Hermeuptychia populations in the lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas apart from H. sosybius. These southern populations, also found in northeastern Mexico, are described here as Hermeuptychia hermybius Grishin, sp. n. (type locality Texas: Cameron County). While being phylogenetically closer to H. sosybius than to any other Hermeuptychia species, H. hermybius can usually be recognized by wing patterns, such as the size of eyespots and the shape of brown lines on hindwing. "Intricate Satyr" and "South Texas Satyr" are proposed as the English names for H. intricata and H. hermybius, respectively.
细纹赫美眼蝶(Hermeuptychia intricata Grishin, 新种)是在美国得克萨斯州布拉佐斯本德州立公园被描述的,它与索氏赫美眼蝶(Hermeuptychia sosybius (Fabricius, 1793))同步飞行。这两个物种在雄性和雌性生殖器方面差异很大,线粒体DNA的细胞色素氧化酶亚基I(COI)条形码序列有3.5%的差异。撇开如此显著的生殖器和基因型差异不谈,我们无法找到可靠的翅纹特征来区分这两个物种。这种表面上的相似性或许可以解释为什么与索氏赫美眼蝶亲缘关系甚远的细纹赫美眼蝶,尽管广泛分布于美国南卡罗来纳州到得克萨斯州的沿海平原(可能还分布到哥斯达黎加),却一直未被发现。更使一个隐存物种的存在难以被察觉的是,这两种蝴蝶的翅纹都是可变的,而且腹面眼斑大小不一,有的很大,有的几乎没有。为避免与新物种混淆,指定了1793年描述的美国东北部常见蝴蝶——索氏凤蝶(Papilio sosybius Fabricius)的新模式标本,采自美国佐治亚州的萨凡纳。这确保了该名称被普遍接受的传统用法。此外,我们发现来自美国的赫美眼蝶标本的DNA条形码,即使是来自得克萨斯州最南端的标本,与赫美斯眼蝶(H. hermes (Fabricius, 1775))(模式产地巴西里约热内卢)的至少有4%的差异,这表明“赫美斯眼蝶”这个名称不应用于美国的种群,而应保留给南美洲的物种。雄性生殖器的比较进一步支持了这一结论。然而,外貌、生殖器以及2.1%的DNA条形码差异使得克萨斯州下里奥格兰德河谷的赫美眼蝶种群与索氏赫美眼蝶区分开来。这些在墨西哥东北部也有发现的南部种群,在此被描述为赫米比赫美眼蝶(Hermeuptychia hermybius Grishin, 新种)(模式产地得克萨斯州卡梅伦县)。虽然赫米比赫美眼蝶在系统发育上比其他任何赫美眼蝶物种都更接近索氏赫美眼蝶,但通常可以通过翅纹来识别,比如眼斑大小和后翅棕色线条的形状。分别提议将“细纹眼蝶”和“南得克萨斯眼蝶”作为细纹赫美眼蝶和赫米比赫美眼蝶的英文名。