Hogan Neasa, Kehoe Maria, Larkin Aidan, Coote Susan
Clinical Therapies Department, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Multiple Sclerosis Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
Mult Scler Int. 2014;2014:109142. doi: 10.1155/2014/109142. Epub 2014 Jan 2.
Background. Mobility limitations are a key feature of MS and 25% will require the use of a walking aid 15 years after diagnosis. Few studies have specifically evaluated the effectiveness of physiotherapy and exercise interventions delivered in the community for those with significant disability. Methods. An assessor blind, block randomised, and controlled study recruited participants who required bilateral assistance for gait and who occasionally used wheelchairs for longer distances. They were randomised to 10 weeks of group physiotherapy (balance and strengthening exercises), individual physiotherapy, yoga group, or a control group. Results. Repeated measures ANOVA found significant time effects for physical component of MSIS-29v2 (f = 7.993, P = 0.006) and MFIS (f = 8.695, P = 0.004). The group × time interaction was significant for the BBS (f = 4.391, P = 0.006). Post hoc analysis revealed no difference between group and individual physiotherapy for BBS. There was no significant difference between groups but the 6MWT improved for individual physiotherapy (P = 0.001) and MSIS-29v2 psychological score for group physiotherapy (P = 0.005). Discussion. This study found that balance and strengthening exercises, delivered in the community to those with significant mobility limitations, improve balance. The effect on walking endurance and patient-reported outcomes are unclear and warrants further investigation with a larger control group with similar baseline characteristics to the intervention groups.
背景。行动能力受限是多发性硬化症的一个关键特征,25%的患者在确诊15年后将需要使用助行器。很少有研究专门评估社区提供的物理治疗和运动干预对严重残疾患者的有效性。方法。一项评估者盲法、区组随机对照研究招募了需要双侧步态辅助且偶尔使用轮椅进行较长距离出行的参与者。他们被随机分为接受10周的团体物理治疗(平衡和强化训练)、个体物理治疗、瑜伽团体治疗或对照组。结果。重复测量方差分析发现,MSIS - 29v2的身体成分(F = 7.993,P = 0.006)和MFIS(F = 8.695,P = 0.004)有显著的时间效应。BBS的组×时间交互作用显著(F = 4.391,P = 0.006)。事后分析显示,团体物理治疗和个体物理治疗在BBS方面无差异。各组之间无显著差异,但个体物理治疗的6分钟步行试验有所改善(P = 0.001),团体物理治疗的MSIS - 29v2心理评分有所改善(P = 0.005)。讨论。本研究发现,对行动能力严重受限的人群在社区进行平衡和强化训练可改善平衡。对步行耐力和患者报告结局的影响尚不清楚,需要在具有与干预组相似基线特征的更大对照组中进行进一步研究。