Blanco Carlos, Rubio José, Wall Melanie, Wang Shuai, Jiu Chelsea J, Kendler Kenneth S
Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, New York.
Depress Anxiety. 2014 Sep;31(9):756-64. doi: 10.1002/da.22247. Epub 2014 Feb 27.
Anxiety disorders and major depressive disorder (MDD) often co-occur and share a broad range of risk factors. The goal of this study was to examine whether the co-occurrence of anxiety disorders and MDD could be explained by an underlying latent factor and whether the risk factors exert their effect exclusively through this factor, directly on each disorder, or through a combination of effects at both levels.
Data were drawn from a large, nationally representative sample. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to identify the latent structure of anxiety disorders. A multiple indicators multiple causes (MIMIC) approach was used to assess the common and specific effects of risk factors for anxiety disorders.
A one-factor model provided a good fit to the co-occurrence of anxiety disorders. Low self-esteem, family history of depression, female sex, childhood sexual abuse, White race, years of education, number of traumatic experiences, and disturbed family environment increased the risk of anxiety disorders and MDD through their effect on the latent factor. There were also several direct effects of the covariates on the disorders, indicating that the effect of the covariates differed across disorders.
Risk for anxiety disorders and MDD appears to be mediated partially by a latent variable underlying anxiety disorders and MDD, and partially by disorder-specific effects. These findings may contribute to account for the high rates of comorbidity among disorders, identify commonalities in the etiologies of these disorders, and provide clues for the development of unified preventive interventions.
焦虑症和重度抑郁症(MDD)常同时出现,且有广泛的共同风险因素。本研究的目的是检验焦虑症和MDD的共病现象是否可由一个潜在的潜在因素来解释,以及这些风险因素是仅通过该因素发挥作用、直接作用于每种疾病,还是通过两个层面的综合作用来发挥作用。
数据来源于一个具有全国代表性的大样本。采用验证性因素分析来确定焦虑症的潜在结构。使用多指标多原因(MIMIC)方法来评估焦虑症风险因素的共同和特定效应。
单因素模型对焦虑症的共病情况拟合良好。低自尊、抑郁症家族史、女性、童年期性虐待、白人种族、受教育年限、创伤经历数量和家庭环境紊乱通过对潜在因素的影响增加了焦虑症和MDD的风险。协变量对这些疾病也有一些直接影响,表明协变量的影响因疾病而异。
焦虑症和MDD的风险似乎部分由焦虑症和MDD潜在的一个潜在变量介导,部分由疾病特异性效应介导。这些发现可能有助于解释疾病之间的高共病率,识别这些疾病病因中的共性,并为制定统一的预防性干预措施提供线索。