a Department of Health and Behavioral Sciences, University of Colorado Denver , Denver , USA.
Cult Health Sex. 2014;16(4):397-411. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2014.883645. Epub 2014 Feb 28.
Research on HIV testing decision-making overlooks a complex array of interpersonal factors that go beyond HIV risk and extend into the realms of intimacy, love and marriage. The current study draws upon two sets of qualitative data, semi-structured interviews and focus-group discussions, to investigate how romantic relationships shape HIV testing perceptions and experiences in rural Malawi. It invokes the classical works of symbolic interactionism to frame how people create meaning around the act of HIV testing that fits with their everyday lives. Pre-marital HIV testing was considered an acceptable method to confirm a partner's trustworthiness and commitment to the relationship. However, during marriage, a spontaneous discussion of HIV testing signified a breach of fidelity or that a partner could not be trusted. This belief was transposed such that an HIV test could also be used to confirm a person's moral character in the face of infidelity accusations and gossip. Thus, HIV testing during marriage was labelled as an unusual event, one reserved for special or problematic circumstances, rather than for regular screening of disease. A discussion of how these findings can inform HIV testing programmes and policy in sub-Saharan Africa is provided.
研究表明,艾滋病毒检测决策往往忽视了一系列复杂的人际因素,这些因素超出了艾滋病毒风险的范围,并延伸到了亲密关系、爱和婚姻领域。本研究借鉴了两组定性数据,即半结构化访谈和焦点小组讨论,旨在调查在马拉维农村地区,浪漫关系如何影响艾滋病毒检测的看法和体验。它援引了符号互动主义的经典著作,阐述了人们如何围绕艾滋病毒检测行为创造符合日常生活的意义。婚前艾滋病毒检测被认为是一种确认伴侣值得信赖和对关系承诺的可接受方法。然而,在婚姻中,艾滋病毒检测的自发讨论标志着忠诚的破裂,或者表示伴侣不可信。这种信念被转化为,艾滋病毒检测也可以用于在面对不忠指控和流言蜚语时确认一个人的道德品质。因此,婚姻期间的艾滋病毒检测被标记为异常事件,是为特殊或有问题的情况保留的,而不是为了定期筛查疾病。本文还讨论了这些发现如何为撒哈拉以南非洲的艾滋病毒检测计划和政策提供信息。