Rizzo Stefania, Calareso Giuseppina, Maccagnoni Sara, Angileri Salvatore Alessio, Landoni Fabio, Raimondi Sara, Pasquali Elena, Lazzari Roberta, Bellomi Massimo
Department of Radiology, European Institute of Oncology, via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy.
Department of Radiology, European Institute of Oncology, via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy.
Eur J Radiol. 2014 May;83(5):858-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.01.029. Epub 2014 Feb 7.
This study compared the MR measurement of minimum uninvolved cervical stroma and maximum stromal invasion, and the detection of positive lymph nodes with the pathological results. In addition, tumour type and grade were correlated with nodal status and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values.
Patients who underwent surgery and MR at our centre for early stage cervical cancer (FIGO IA1-IIB) were included. Data recorded included: age, date of MR, clinical FIGO (International Federation of Gynacology and Obstetrics) stage, histological type and grade, adjuvant therapy, pre-surgical conisation. MR evaluation included: measurement of the minimum uninvolved stroma, maximum thickness of stromal involvement, presence and site of positive pelvic lymph nodes, calculation of ADC values. Statistical analysis was performed to compare MR and pathological results. The agreement between MR and pathology in measuring depth of stromal invasion was analysed by Bland-Altman plot, calculating the limits of agreement (LoA).
113/217 patients underwent adjuvant therapies. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of MR in evaluation of minimum thickness of uninvolved cervical stroma were 88%, 75%, 70%, 90% and 80%; the same values in evaluation of pelvic positive lymph nodes were 64%, 85%, 65%, 84% and 78%. The mean difference between MR and pathological results in measuring maximum depth of stromal invasion was -0.65mm (95% LoA: -9.37mm; 8.07mm). Depth of stromal invasion was strongly related to positive nodal status (p<0.001). ADC values (available in 51/217 patients) were not associated with the features assessed.
Pre-surgical MR is accurate (80%) in evaluating the minimum thickness of uninvolved cervical stroma; MR measurements of maximum depth of stromal invasion differed ±9mm from the pathological results in 95% of cases. Furthermore, a strong association was found between the depth of stromal invasion and the presence of positive lymph nodes, suggesting that inclusion of these measurements in the MR report might guide the choice of the best treatment option for early cervical cancer patients.
本研究比较了子宫颈最小未受累基质和最大基质浸润的磁共振成像(MR)测量结果以及阳性淋巴结的检测结果与病理结果。此外,还分析了肿瘤类型和分级与淋巴结状态及表观扩散系数(ADC)值之间的相关性。
纳入在本中心接受早期宫颈癌(国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)IA1-IIB期)手术及MR检查的患者。记录的数据包括:年龄、MR检查日期、临床FIGO分期、组织学类型和分级、辅助治疗、术前锥形切除术。MR评估包括:测量最小未受累基质、基质受累的最大厚度、盆腔阳性淋巴结的存在及位置、计算ADC值。进行统计分析以比较MR和病理结果。通过Bland-Altman图分析MR与病理在测量基质浸润深度方面的一致性,计算一致性界限(LoA)。
113/217例患者接受了辅助治疗。MR评估子宫颈最小未受累基质最小厚度时的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值及准确性分别为88%、75%、70%、90%和80%;评估盆腔阳性淋巴结时的相应值分别为64%、85%、65%、84%和78%。MR与病理结果在测量基质浸润最大深度方面的平均差值为-0.65mm(95% LoA:-9.37mm;8.07mm)。基质浸润深度与阳性淋巴结状态密切相关(p<0.001)。ADC值(217例患者中有51例可获得)与所评估的特征无关。
术前MR在评估子宫颈最小未受累基质最小厚度方面准确率为80%;在95%的病例中,MR测量的基质浸润最大深度与病理结果相差±9mm。此外,发现基质浸润深度与阳性淋巴结的存在之间存在密切关联,这表明在MR报告中纳入这些测量结果可能会为早期宫颈癌患者最佳治疗方案的选择提供指导。