Suppr超能文献

自上而下和自下而上针对慢性复发性腰痛:经颅直流电刺激与外周电刺激联合干预

Targeting chronic recurrent low back pain from the top-down and the bottom-up: a combined transcranial direct current stimulation and peripheral electrical stimulation intervention.

作者信息

Schabrun Siobhan M, Jones Emma, Elgueta Cancino Edith L, Hodges Paul W

机构信息

The University of Queensland, NHMRC Centre of Clinical Research Excellence in Spinal Pain, Injury and Health, School of Health and Rehabilitations Sciences, St Lucia, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia.

The University of Queensland, NHMRC Centre of Clinical Research Excellence in Spinal Pain, Injury and Health, School of Health and Rehabilitations Sciences, St Lucia, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia.

出版信息

Brain Stimul. 2014 May-Jun;7(3):451-9. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2014.01.058. Epub 2014 Jan 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mechanisms such as neural sensitization and maladaptive cortical organization provide novel targets for therapy in chronic recurrent low back pain (CLBP).

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the effect of a transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and peripheral electrical stimulation (PES) treatment on pain, cortical organization, sensitization and sensory function in CLBP.

METHODS

Using a placebo-controlled crossover design, 16 individuals received four treatments in separate sessions: (i) anodal tDCS/PES; (ii) anodal tDCS/sham PES; (iii) sham tDCS/PES; or (iv) sham tDCS/sham PES. Pain was assessed at baseline, immediately following, and at 1 and 3 days after treatment. Motor cortical organization, sensitization and sensory function were measured before and immediately after treatment.

RESULTS

Combined tDCS/PES reduced pain and sensitization, normalized motor cortical organization and improved sensory function. The reduction in pain was greater in individuals with more pronounced sensitization. Applied alone, tDCS or PES also reduced pain. However, with the exception of improved sensory function and reduced map volume following PES, clinical and neurophysiological outcomes were unaltered by tDCS or PES applied separately. No changes were observed following sham treatment.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest a combined tDCS/PES intervention more effectively improves CLBP symptoms and mechanisms of cortical organization and sensitization, than either intervention applied alone or a sham control.

摘要

背景

神经致敏和适应性不良的皮质组织等机制为慢性复发性下腰痛(CLBP)的治疗提供了新的靶点。

目的

我们研究了经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)和外周电刺激(PES)治疗对CLBP患者疼痛、皮质组织、致敏和感觉功能的影响。

方法

采用安慰剂对照交叉设计,16名受试者在不同阶段接受四种治疗:(i)阳极tDCS/PES;(ii)阳极tDCS/假PES;(iii)假tDCS/PES;或(iv)假tDCS/假PES。在基线、治疗后即刻、治疗后1天和3天评估疼痛情况。在治疗前和治疗后即刻测量运动皮质组织、致敏和感觉功能。

结果

tDCS/PES联合治疗可减轻疼痛和致敏,使运动皮质组织恢复正常,并改善感觉功能。在致敏更明显的个体中,疼痛减轻更为显著。单独应用tDCS或PES也可减轻疼痛。然而,除了PES后感觉功能改善和脑图谱体积减小外,单独应用tDCS或PES时,临床和神经生理学结果未发生改变。假治疗后未观察到变化。

结论

我们的数据表明,与单独应用任何一种干预措施或假对照相比,tDCS/PES联合干预能更有效地改善CLBP症状以及皮质组织和致敏机制。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验