Fevery Bart, Susser Simone, Lenz Oliver, Cloherty Gavin, Perner Dany, Picchio Gaston, Sarrazin Christoph
Janssen Infectious Disease BVBA, Beerse, Belgium.
Antivir Ther. 2014;19(6):559-67. doi: 10.3851/IMP2760. Epub 2014 Feb 28.
Response-guided therapy (RGT) for HCV treatment, whereby therapy duration is shortened according to on-treatment virological response, requires patient HCV RNA concentrations below the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) or limit of detection (LOD) of the viral load assay at weeks 4 and 12. Concordance of two assays and impact on treatment decisions were investigated.
Plasma samples (n=1,411; baseline to week 12) from HCV genotype-1-infected patients (n=290) receiving simeprevir (TMC435) plus pegylated interferon-α2a/ribavirin in the PILLAR study (NCT00882908) were analysed using Roche High-Pure-System/COBAS(®) TaqMan(®) v2.0 assay (HPS; LLOQ 25 IU/ml and LOD 15 IU/ml; Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, USA) and reanalysed using Abbott realtime assay (ART; LLOQ and LOD 12 IU/ml; Abbott Molecular Inc., Des Plaines, IL, USA).
Overall, 217/766 (28.3%) samples from different time points with HCV RNA undetectable by HPS had HCV RNA detectable by ART. Conversely, 35/584 (6.0%) samples undetectable by ART were detectable by HPS. For both assays, most discrepant samples (96-100%) had HCV RNA<25 IU/ml. At week 4, 75.5% of samples were undetectable by HPS, whereas 49.4% were undetectable by ART, resulting in different RGT assessment in 26.1% (P<0.0001). At week 12, 95.4% and 91.9% of samples were undetectable with HPS and ART, respectively.
Lower rates of undetectable HCV RNA with ART at week 4 suggest that if RGT criteria are determined with ART, the proportion of patients qualifying for shorter treatment duration may be significantly lower (26%). Therefore, different RGT criteria may be necessary for ART to maximize numbers benefiting from shortened treatment. Further testing and validation are required.
丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)治疗的应答指导疗法(RGT)是根据治疗期间的病毒学应答来缩短治疗疗程,这要求患者在第4周和第12周时的HCV RNA浓度低于病毒载量检测的定量下限(LLOQ)或检测下限(LOD)。本研究调查了两种检测方法的一致性及其对治疗决策的影响。
在PILLAR研究(NCT00882908)中,对290例感染HCV基因型1的患者接受simeprevir(TMC435)联合聚乙二醇化干扰素-α2a/利巴韦林治疗期间的血浆样本(n = 1411;从基线至第12周),采用罗氏高纯系统/COBAS(®) TaqMan(®) v2.0检测法(HPS;LLOQ为25 IU/ml,LOD为15 IU/ml;美国印第安纳波利斯罗氏诊断公司)进行分析,并使用雅培实时检测法(ART;LLOQ和LOD均为12 IU/ml;美国伊利诺伊州德斯普兰斯雅培分子公司)重新分析。
总体而言,在不同时间点,HPS检测不到HCV RNA的217/766(28.3%)份样本,ART检测到了HCV RNA。相反,ART检测不到的35/584(6.0%)份样本,HPS检测到了。对于两种检测方法,大多数有差异的样本(96 - 100%)的HCV RNA < 25 IU/ml。在第4周时,HPS检测不到75.5%的样本,而ART检测不到49.4%的样本,导致26.1%的样本RGT评估结果不同(P < 0.0001)。在第12周时,HPS和ART分别检测不到95.4%和91.9%的样本。
第4周时ART检测不到HCV RNA的比例较低,这表明如果用ART来确定RGT标准,符合缩短治疗疗程条件的患者比例可能会显著降低(26%)。因此,ART可能需要不同的RGT标准,以使更多患者受益于缩短疗程。这还需要进一步的测试和验证。