Redjadj Claire, Darmon Gaëlle, Maillard Daniel, Chevrier Thierry, Bastianelli Denis, Verheyden Hélène, Loison Anne, Saïd Sonia
Laboratoire d'Ecologie Alpine, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Université de Savoie, Le Bourget-du-Lac, France ; Centre national d'Etudes et de la Recherches Appliquées sur la Faune de Montagne et les Cervidés-Sanglier, Office National de la Chasse et de la Faune Sauvage, Le Perray-en-Yvelines, France.
Laboratoire d'Ecologie Alpine, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Université de Savoie, Le Bourget-du-Lac, France ; Chaire de recherche industrielle Produits forestiers Anticosti, Département de Biologie, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 24;9(2):e84756. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084756. eCollection 2014.
Species diversity in large herbivore communities is often explained by niche segregation allowed by differences in body mass and digestive morphophysiological features. Based on large number of gut samples in fall and winter, we analysed the temporal dynamics of diet composition, quality and interspecific overlap of 4 coexisting mountain herbivores. We tested whether the relative consumption of grass and browse differed among species of different rumen types (moose-type and intermediate-type), whether diet was of lower quality for the largest species, whether we could identify plant species which determined diet quality, and whether these plants, which could be "key-food-resources" were similar for all herbivores. Our analyses revealed that (1) body mass and rumen types were overall poor predictors of diet composition and quality, although the roe deer, a species with a moose-type rumen was confirmed as an "obligatory non grazer", while red deer, the largest species, had the most lignified diet; (2) diet overlap among herbivores was well predicted by rumen type (high among species of intermediate types only), when measured over broad plant groups, (3) the relationship between diet composition and quality differed among herbivore species, and the actual plant species used during winter which determined the diet quality, was herbivore species-specific. Even if diets overlapped to a great extent, the species-specific relationships between diet composition and quality suggest that herbivores may select different plant species within similar plant group types, or different plant parts and that this, along with other behavioural mechanisms of ecological niche segregation, may contribute to the coexistence of large herbivores of relatively similar body mass, as observed in mountain ecosystems.
大型食草动物群落中的物种多样性通常由体重差异和消化形态生理特征所允许的生态位分离来解释。基于秋冬季节大量的肠道样本,我们分析了4种共存的山地食草动物的饮食组成、质量和种间重叠的时间动态。我们测试了不同瘤胃类型(驼鹿型和中间型)的物种之间草和嫩枝的相对消耗量是否不同,最大的物种的饮食质量是否较低,我们是否能够识别决定饮食质量的植物物种,以及这些可能是“关键食物资源”的植物对所有食草动物是否相似。我们的分析表明:(1)体重和瘤胃类型总体上不是饮食组成和质量的良好预测指标,尽管具有驼鹿型瘤胃的狍被确认为“ obligatory non grazer”,而最大的物种马鹿的饮食木质化程度最高;(2)当在广泛的植物组中进行测量时,瘤胃类型能很好地预测食草动物之间的饮食重叠(仅在中间类型的物种中重叠程度高);(3)食草动物物种之间饮食组成和质量的关系不同,冬季实际使用的决定饮食质量的植物物种是特定于食草动物物种的。即使饮食在很大程度上重叠,饮食组成和质量之间的物种特异性关系表明,食草动物可能在相似的植物组类型中选择不同的植物物种,或不同的植物部位,并且这与生态位分离的其他行为机制一起,可能有助于体重相对相似的大型食草动物共存,如在山地生态系统中所观察到的那样。