Suppr超能文献

老年人长期护理服务的决定因素:一项基于台湾地区人群的研究。

Determinants of long-term care services among the elderly: a population-based study in Taiwan.

作者信息

Wu Chen-Yi, Hu Hsiao-Yun, Huang Nicole, Fang Yi-Ting, Chou Yiing-Jeng, Li Chung-Pin

机构信息

Institute of Public Health, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan ; Department of Dermatology, Taipei City Hospital, Heping Fuyou Branch, Taipei, Taiwan.

Institute of Public Health, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan ; Department of Education and Research, Taipei City Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2014 Feb 19;9(2):e89213. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089213. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to investigate determinants of long-term care use and to clarify the differing characteristics of home/community-based and institution-based services users.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional, population-based study.

SETTING

Utilizing data from the 2005 National Health Interview Survey conducted in Taiwan.

PARTICIPANTS

A national sample of 2,608 people (1,312 men, 1,296 women) aged 65 and older.

MEASUREMENTS

The utilization of long-term care services (both home/community- and institution-based services) was measured. A χ(2) analysis tested differences in baseline characteristics between home/community-based and institution-based long-term care users. The multiple-logistic model was adopted with a hierarchical approach adding the Andersen model's predisposing, enabling, and need factors sequentially. Multiple logistic models further stratified data by gender and age.

RESULTS

Compared with users of home/community-based care, those using institution-based care had less education (p = 0.019), greater likelihood of being single (p = 0.001), fewer family members (p = 0.002), higher prevalence of stool incontinence (p = 0.011) and dementia (P = .025), and greater disability (p = 0.016). After adjustment, age (compared with 65-69 years; 75-79 years, odds ratio [OR] = 2.08, p = 0.044; age ≥80, OR = 3.30, p = 0.002), being single (OR = 2.16, p = 0.006), urban living (OR = 1.68, p = 0.037), stroke (OR = 2.08, p = 0.015), dementia (OR = 2.32, p = 0.007), 1-3 items of activities of daily living (ADL) disability (OR = 5.56, p<0.001), and 4-6 items of ADL disability (OR = 21.57, p<0.001) were significantly associated with long-term care use.

CONCLUSION

Age, single marital status, stroke, dementia, and ADL disability are predictive factors for long-term care use. The utilization was directly proportional to the level of disability.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在调查长期护理使用的决定因素,并阐明居家/社区护理和机构护理服务使用者的不同特征。

设计

基于人群的横断面研究。

背景

利用2005年在台湾进行的国民健康访谈调查数据。

参与者

2608名65岁及以上的全国性样本(1312名男性,1296名女性)。

测量指标

测量长期护理服务(包括居家/社区护理和机构护理服务)的使用情况。采用χ(2)分析检验居家/社区护理和机构长期护理使用者在基线特征上的差异。采用多逻辑模型,采用分层方法依次加入安德森模型的易患因素、促成因素和需求因素。多逻辑模型进一步按性别和年龄对数据进行分层。

结果

与居家/社区护理使用者相比,机构护理使用者受教育程度较低(p = 0.019),单身可能性更大(p = 0.001),家庭成员较少(p = 0.002),大便失禁(p = 0.011)和痴呆症(P = 0.025)患病率较高,残疾程度更高(p = 0.016)。调整后,年龄(与65 - 69岁相比;75 - 79岁,比值比[OR] = 2.08,p = 0.044;年龄≥80岁,OR = 3.30,p = 0.002)、单身(OR = 2.16,p = 0.006)、城市居住(OR = 1.68,p = 0.037)、中风(OR = 2.08,p = 0.015)、痴呆症(OR = 2.32,p = 0.007)、日常生活活动(ADL)有1 - 3项残疾(OR = 5.56,p < 0.001)以及ADL有4 - 6项残疾(OR = 21.57,p < 0.001)与长期护理使用显著相关。

结论

年龄、单身婚姻状况、中风、痴呆症和ADL残疾是长期护理使用的预测因素。使用率与残疾程度成正比。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

4
Home care for the elderly with dementia: a systematic review.老年痴呆症患者的居家护理:一项系统综述。
Dement Neuropsychol. 2023 Nov 10;17:e20220052. doi: 10.1590/1980-5764-DN-2022-0052. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

6
Predicting the need of formal care in Taiwan: analysis of a national random sample.预测台湾对正规护理的需求:全国随机抽样分析。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2011 Nov-Dec;53(3):298-302. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2010.12.003. Epub 2011 Feb 3.
10
Prediction of institutionalization in the elderly. A systematic review.老年人机构化预测。系统综述。
Age Ageing. 2010 Jan;39(1):31-8. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afp202. Epub 2009 Nov 23.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验