Suppr超能文献

基于物种和基于栖息地的替代指标的实证评估与比较:以森林脊椎动物和大型古树为例

An empirical assessment and comparison of species-based and habitat-based surrogates: a case study of forest vertebrates and large old trees.

作者信息

Lindenmayer David B, Barton Philip S, Lane Peter W, Westgate Martin J, McBurney Lachlan, Blair David, Gibbons Philip, Likens Gene E

机构信息

Fenner School of Environment and Society, ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions and National Environmental Research Program, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.

Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies, Millbrook, New York, United States of America ; Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2014 Feb 24;9(2):e89807. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089807. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

A holy grail of conservation is to find simple but reliable measures of environmental change to guide management. For example, particular species or particular habitat attributes are often used as proxies for the abundance or diversity of a subset of other taxa. However, the efficacy of such kinds of species-based surrogates and habitat-based surrogates is rarely assessed, nor are different kinds of surrogates compared in terms of their relative effectiveness. We use 30-year datasets on arboreal marsupials and vegetation structure to quantify the effectiveness of: (1) the abundance of a particular species of arboreal marsupial as a species-based surrogate for other arboreal marsupial taxa, (2) hollow-bearing tree abundance as a habitat-based surrogate for arboreal marsupial abundance, and (3) a combination of species- and habitat-based surrogates. We also quantify the robustness of species-based and habitat-based surrogates over time. We then use the same approach to model overall species richness of arboreal marsupials. We show that a species-based surrogate can appear to be a valid surrogate until a habitat-based surrogate is co-examined, after which the effectiveness of the former is lost. The addition of a species-based surrogate to a habitat-based surrogate made little difference in explaining arboreal marsupial abundance, but altered the co-occurrence relationship between species. Hence, there was limited value in simultaneously using a combination of kinds of surrogates. The habitat-based surrogate also generally performed significantly better and was easier and less costly to gather than the species-based surrogate. We found that over 30 years of study, the relationships which underpinned the habitat-based surrogate generally remained positive but variable over time. Our work highlights why it is important to compare the effectiveness of different broad classes of surrogates and identify situations when either species- or habitat-based surrogates are likely to be superior.

摘要

保护工作的一个圣杯是找到简单而可靠的环境变化衡量标准来指导管理。例如,特定物种或特定栖息地属性常被用作其他分类单元子集丰度或多样性的替代指标。然而,这类基于物种的替代指标和基于栖息地的替代指标的有效性很少被评估,不同类型的替代指标在相对有效性方面也未被比较。我们使用了关于树栖有袋动物和植被结构的30年数据集,以量化以下方面的有效性:(1)一种特定树栖有袋动物的丰度作为基于物种的替代指标,用于替代其他树栖有袋动物分类单元;(2)有树洞的树木丰度作为基于栖息地的替代指标,用于替代树栖有袋动物的丰度;(3)基于物种和基于栖息地的替代指标的组合。我们还量化了基于物种和基于栖息地的替代指标随时间的稳健性。然后,我们使用相同的方法对树栖有袋动物的总体物种丰富度进行建模。我们表明,在同时考察基于栖息地的替代指标之前,基于物种的替代指标可能看起来是有效的替代指标,但在此之后,前者的有效性就会丧失。将基于物种的替代指标添加到基于栖息地的替代指标中,在解释树栖有袋动物丰度方面几乎没有差异,但改变了物种之间的共存关系。因此,同时使用多种替代指标的组合价值有限。基于栖息地的替代指标通常表现也明显更好,而且比基于物种的替代指标更容易获取且成本更低。我们发现,在30年的研究中,支撑基于栖息地的替代指标的关系总体上保持积极,但随时间变化不定。我们的工作突出了比较不同大类替代指标有效性以及确定基于物种或基于栖息地的替代指标可能更具优势的情况的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9b8/3933686/64ac5e7eb963/pone.0089807.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验