Department of Ecosystem Services, UFZ - Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Permoserstr. 15, 04318, Leipzig, Germany.
German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Deutscher Platz 5e, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Ambio. 2017 Nov;46(7):756-768. doi: 10.1007/s13280-017-0922-x. Epub 2017 May 13.
Spatial prioritization could help target conservation actions directed to maintain both biodiversity and ecosystem services. We delineate hotspots and coldspots of two biodiversity conservation features and five regulating and cultural services by incorporating an indicator of 'threat', i.e. timber harvest profitability for forest areas in Telemark (Norway). We found hotspots, where high values of biodiversity, ecosystem services and threat coincide, ranging from 0.1 to 7.1% of the area, depending on varying threshold levels. Targeting of these areas for conservation follows reactive conservation approaches. In coldspots, high biodiversity and ecosystem service values coincide with low levels of threat, and cover 0.1-3.4% of the forest area. These areas might serve proactive conservation approaches at lower opportunity cost (foregone timber harvest profits). We conclude that a combination of indicators of biodiversity, ecosystem services and potential threat is an appropriate approach for spatial prioritization of proactive and reactive conservation strategies.
空间优先级排序可以帮助确定保护行动的目标,以维持生物多样性和生态系统服务。我们通过纳入“威胁”指标(即特伦马克地区(挪威)森林地区的木材采伐盈利能力),划定了两个生物多样性保护特征和五个调节与文化服务的热点和冷点。我们发现,热点区域的生物多样性、生态系统服务和威胁值都很高,其面积占比从 0.1%到 7.1%不等,具体取决于不同的阈值水平。针对这些区域的保护措施遵循被动保护方法。在冷点区域,生物多样性和生态系统服务的高值与威胁水平较低相重合,其面积占森林面积的 0.1%到 3.4%。这些区域可能采用主动保护方法的机会成本较低(放弃的木材采伐利润)。我们的结论是,生物多样性、生态系统服务和潜在威胁的综合指标是确定主动和被动保护策略空间优先级排序的一种合适方法。