• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Incorporating threat in hotspots and coldspots of biodiversity and ecosystem services.将威胁纳入生物多样性和生态系统服务的热点和冷点。
Ambio. 2017 Nov;46(7):756-768. doi: 10.1007/s13280-017-0922-x. Epub 2017 May 13.
2
Ecosystem services and opportunity costs shift spatial priorities for conserving forest biodiversity.生态系统服务和机会成本改变了保护森林生物多样性的空间优先次序。
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 13;9(11):e112557. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112557. eCollection 2014.
3
Mapping the economic costs and benefits of conservation.描绘保护工作的经济成本与效益。
PLoS Biol. 2006 Oct;4(11):e360. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040360.
4
The positive carbon stocks-biodiversity relationship in forests: co-occurrence and drivers across five subclimates.森林中正向碳储量-生物多样性关系:五个亚气候区的共同出现和驱动因素。
Ecol Appl. 2018 Sep;28(6):1481-1493. doi: 10.1002/eap.1749. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
5
Geospatial characterization of deforestation, fragmentation and forest fires in Telangana state, India: conservation perspective.印度特伦甘纳邦森林砍伐、森林碎片化及森林火灾的地理空间特征:保护视角
Environ Monit Assess. 2015 Jul;187(7):455. doi: 10.1007/s10661-015-4673-5. Epub 2015 Jun 21.
6
Exclusion of agricultural lands in spatial conservation prioritization strategies: consequences for biodiversity and ecosystem service representation.空间保护优先策略中农业用地的排除:对生物多样性和生态系统服务表征的影响。
Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Oct 7;281(1792). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.1529.
7
Effects of land use, cover, and protection on stream and riparian ecosystem services and biodiversity.土地利用、覆盖和保护对溪流和河岸生态系统服务及生物多样性的影响。
Conserv Biol. 2020 Feb;34(1):244-255. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13348. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
8
Biodiversity and carbon conservation under the ecosystem stability of tropical forests.热带森林生态系统稳定性下的生物多样性和碳保护。
J Environ Manage. 2023 Nov 1;345:118929. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118929. Epub 2023 Sep 12.
9
Rapid Assessment of Ecosystem Service Co-Benefits of Biodiversity Priority Areas in Madagascar.马达加斯加生物多样性优先区域生态系统服务协同效益的快速评估
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 22;11(12):e0168575. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168575. eCollection 2016.
10
Spatio-temporal variations of conservation hotspots based on ecosystem services in Xishuangbanna, Southwest China.基于生态系统服务的中国西南西双版纳保护热点的时空变化
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 12;12(12):e0189368. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189368. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

1
Global patterns of taxonomic and phylogenetic diversity of flowering plants: Biodiversity hotspots and coldspots.开花植物的分类学和系统发育多样性的全球模式:生物多样性热点和冷点。
Plant Divers. 2023 Feb 4;45(3):265-271. doi: 10.1016/j.pld.2023.01.009. eCollection 2023 May.
2
Linking plant and vertebrate species to Nature's Contributions to People in the Swiss Alps.将植物和脊椎动物物种与瑞士阿尔卑斯山的人类对自然的贡献联系起来。
Sci Rep. 2023 May 5;13(1):7312. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-34236-2.
3
Prioritizing actions: spatial action maps for conservation.优先行动:保护的空间行动图。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2021 Dec;1505(1):118-141. doi: 10.1111/nyas.14651. Epub 2021 Jun 27.
4
Just ten percent of the global terrestrial protected area network is structurally connected via intact land.仅有全球陆地保护区网络的 10% 通过完整的土地在结构上相互连接。
Nat Commun. 2020 Sep 11;11(1):4563. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18457-x.
5
Spatial analyses of threats to ecosystem service hotspots in Greater Durban, South Africa.南非德班大都市区生态系统服务热点面临的威胁的空间分析。
PeerJ. 2018 Oct 26;6:e5723. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5723. eCollection 2018.
6
Where are the hotspots and coldspots of landscape values, visitor use and biodiversity in an urban forest?城市森林中景观价值、游客使用和生物多样性的热点和冷点在哪里?
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 26;13(9):e0203611. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203611. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
Towards a Threat Assessment Framework for Ecosystem Services.迈向生态系统服务威胁评估框架。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2017 Apr;32(4):240-248. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2016.12.011. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
2
Disaggregating the evidence linking biodiversity and ecosystem services.解析生物多样性和生态系统服务之间关联的证据。
Nat Commun. 2016 Oct 7;7:13106. doi: 10.1038/ncomms13106.
3
Spatial prioritisation for conserving ecosystem services: comparing hotspots with heuristic optimisation.保护生态系统服务的空间优先级划分:热点地区与启发式优化方法的比较
Landsc Ecol. 2016;31:431-450. doi: 10.1007/s10980-015-0258-5. Epub 2015 Sep 2.
4
Conservation planning for biodiversity and wilderness: a real-world example.生物多样性与荒野的保护规划:一个实际案例
Environ Manage. 2015 May;55(5):1168-80. doi: 10.1007/s00267-015-0453-9. Epub 2015 Apr 3.
5
Spatial overlap between environmental policy instruments and areas of high conservation value in forest.环境政策工具与森林高保护价值区域之间的空间重叠。
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 11;9(12):e115001. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115001. eCollection 2014.
6
Ecosystem services and opportunity costs shift spatial priorities for conserving forest biodiversity.生态系统服务和机会成本改变了保护森林生物多样性的空间优先次序。
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 13;9(11):e112557. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112557. eCollection 2014.
7
Uncertainties in ecosystem service maps: a comparison on the European scale.生态系统服务地图中的不确定性:欧洲尺度的比较。
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 22;9(10):e109643. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109643. eCollection 2014.
8
Global meta-analysis reveals low consistency of biodiversity congruence relationships.全球荟萃分析显示生物多样性一致性关系的一致性低。
Nat Commun. 2014 May 21;5:3899. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4899.
9
An empirical assessment and comparison of species-based and habitat-based surrogates: a case study of forest vertebrates and large old trees.基于物种和基于栖息地的替代指标的实证评估与比较:以森林脊椎动物和大型古树为例
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 24;9(2):e89807. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089807. eCollection 2014.
10
Joint analysis of stressors and ecosystem services to enhance restoration effectiveness.联合压力因素和生态系统服务分析,以提高恢复效果。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jan 2;110(1):372-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1213841110. Epub 2012 Dec 17.

将威胁纳入生物多样性和生态系统服务的热点和冷点。

Incorporating threat in hotspots and coldspots of biodiversity and ecosystem services.

机构信息

Department of Ecosystem Services, UFZ - Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Permoserstr. 15, 04318, Leipzig, Germany.

German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Deutscher Platz 5e, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

Ambio. 2017 Nov;46(7):756-768. doi: 10.1007/s13280-017-0922-x. Epub 2017 May 13.

DOI:10.1007/s13280-017-0922-x
PMID:28503701
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5622886/
Abstract

Spatial prioritization could help target conservation actions directed to maintain both biodiversity and ecosystem services. We delineate hotspots and coldspots of two biodiversity conservation features and five regulating and cultural services by incorporating an indicator of 'threat', i.e. timber harvest profitability for forest areas in Telemark (Norway). We found hotspots, where high values of biodiversity, ecosystem services and threat coincide, ranging from 0.1 to 7.1% of the area, depending on varying threshold levels. Targeting of these areas for conservation follows reactive conservation approaches. In coldspots, high biodiversity and ecosystem service values coincide with low levels of threat, and cover 0.1-3.4% of the forest area. These areas might serve proactive conservation approaches at lower opportunity cost (foregone timber harvest profits). We conclude that a combination of indicators of biodiversity, ecosystem services and potential threat is an appropriate approach for spatial prioritization of proactive and reactive conservation strategies.

摘要

空间优先级排序可以帮助确定保护行动的目标,以维持生物多样性和生态系统服务。我们通过纳入“威胁”指标(即特伦马克地区(挪威)森林地区的木材采伐盈利能力),划定了两个生物多样性保护特征和五个调节与文化服务的热点和冷点。我们发现,热点区域的生物多样性、生态系统服务和威胁值都很高,其面积占比从 0.1%到 7.1%不等,具体取决于不同的阈值水平。针对这些区域的保护措施遵循被动保护方法。在冷点区域,生物多样性和生态系统服务的高值与威胁水平较低相重合,其面积占森林面积的 0.1%到 3.4%。这些区域可能采用主动保护方法的机会成本较低(放弃的木材采伐利润)。我们的结论是,生物多样性、生态系统服务和潜在威胁的综合指标是确定主动和被动保护策略空间优先级排序的一种合适方法。