Rwigema Jean-Claude M, Chen Allen M, Wang Pin-Chieh, Lee Jay M, Garon Edward, Lee Percy
Department of Radiation Oncology, Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA.
Division of Thoracic Surgery, Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA.
Clin Lung Cancer. 2014 Jul;15(4):287-93. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2014.01.004. Epub 2014 Feb 4.
Patients with stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) do not undergo a staging mediastinoscopy, yet reported mediastinal recurrence rates appear lower than in patients undergoing surgical resection. We determined incidental SBRT doses to assess whether this could account for the low rates of recurrence.
Between March 2009 and September 2012, we reviewed cases of patients with inoperable lung tumors (n = 136) treated with SBRT at our institution. The SBRT regimen was 54 Gy in 3 fractions with positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) staging. Incidental doses to the mediastinal lymph node stations (MLNSs), primary tumor control, locoregional (LR), distant control (DC), and overall survival (OS) rates were determined.
Forty-six patients with stage I NSCLC met the inclusion criteria. The calculated median incidental SBRT dose to all MLNSs was < 5 Gy for the majority of patients (75%). At a median follow-up of 16.8 months (0.6-38.9 months), the 1- and 2-year primary tumor control, LR, OS, and DC rates were 100% and 95.5%, 97.4% and 81.7%, 88.1% and 81%, and 96.9% and 86.9%, respectively. Only 2 patients (4.9%) had mediastinal recurrence, with incidental SBRT doses to MLNSs that were similar to the rest of patients (P > .05).
Low mediastinal recurrence rates in stage I NSCLC treated with SBRT validates the omission of staging mediastinoscopy. The low incidental dose to MLNSs does not seem to explain the low mediastinal recurrence in the majority of patients. Our findings also confirm that prophylactic radiation to the mediastinum is not necessary and support the hypothesis that local ablation of the primary lesion could indirectly affect subclinical nodal disease through unknown mechanisms.
接受立体定向体部放疗(SBRT)治疗的I期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者未进行分期纵隔镜检查,但报告的纵隔复发率似乎低于接受手术切除的患者。我们确定了SBRT的偶然剂量,以评估这是否可以解释低复发率。
2009年3月至2012年9月期间,我们回顾了我院接受SBRT治疗的无法手术的肺肿瘤患者(n = 136)的病例。SBRT方案为分3次给予54 Gy,并进行正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(PET/CT)分期。确定了纵隔淋巴结站(MLNSs)的偶然剂量、原发肿瘤控制率、局部区域(LR)、远处控制(DC)和总生存率(OS)。
46例I期NSCLC患者符合纳入标准。大多数患者(75%)计算得出的所有MLNSs的中位偶然SBRT剂量<5 Gy。在中位随访16.8个月(0.6 - 38.9个月)时,1年和2年的原发肿瘤控制率、LR、OS和DC率分别为100%和95.5%、97.4%和81.7%、88.1%和81%、96.9%和86.9%。只有2例患者(4.9%)发生纵隔复发,其MLNSs的偶然SBRT剂量与其他患者相似(P>.05)。
SBRT治疗的I期NSCLC患者纵隔复发率低证实了省略分期纵隔镜检查的合理性。MLNSs的低偶然剂量似乎无法解释大多数患者的低纵隔复发率。我们的研究结果还证实,对纵隔进行预防性放疗没有必要,并支持以下假设:原发灶的局部消融可能通过未知机制间接影响亚临床淋巴结疾病。