Suppr超能文献

解决注意力捕获争论的进展。

Progress Toward Resolving the Attentional Capture Debate.

作者信息

Luck Steven J, Gaspelin Nicholas, Folk Charles L, Remington Roger W, Theeuwes Jan

机构信息

Center for Mind & Brain, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.

Department of Psychology, Binghamton University, State University of New York, Binghamton, NY, USA.

出版信息

Vis cogn. 2021;29(1):1-21. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2020.1848949. Epub 2020 Dec 1.

Abstract

For over 25 years, researchers have debated whether physically salient stimuli capture attention in an automatic manner, independent of the observer's goals, or whether the capture of attention depends on the match between a stimulus and the observer's task set. Recent evidence suggests an intermediate position in which salient stimuli automatically produce a priority signal, but the capture of attention can be prevented via an inhibitory mechanism that suppresses the salient stimulus. Here, proponents from multiple sides of the debate describe how their original views have changed in light of recent research, as well as remaining areas of disagreement. These perspectives highlight some emerging areas of consensus and provide new directions for future research on attentional capture.

摘要

25 多年来,研究人员一直在争论,物理上显著的刺激是自动吸引注意力,独立于观察者的目标,还是注意力的吸引取决于刺激与观察者任务集之间的匹配。最近的证据表明了一种中间立场,即显著刺激会自动产生一个优先信号,但注意力的吸引可以通过抑制显著刺激的抑制机制来阻止。在这里,辩论各方的支持者描述了他们原来的观点如何根据最近的研究而发生变化,以及仍然存在分歧的领域。这些观点突出了一些新出现的共识领域,并为未来注意力捕捉的研究提供了新的方向。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69a4/7872136/7827658ea0dc/nihms-1648209-f0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验