Universidad de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2014 May;22(3):191-9. doi: 10.1002/erv.2285. Epub 2014 Mar 5.
The present study aims to compare the unwanted intrusions experienced by obsessive-compulsive (OCD) and eating disorder (ED) patients, their appraisals, and their control strategies and analyse which variables predict the intrusions' disruption and emotional disturbance in each group. Seventy-nine OCD and 177 ED patients completed two equivalent self-reports designed to assess OCD-related and ED-related intrusions, their dysfunctional appraisals, and associated control strategies. OCD and ED patients experienced intrusions with comparable frequency and emotional disturbance, but OCD patients experienced greater disruption. Differences appeared between groups on some appraisals and control strategies. Intolerance to uncertainty (OCD group) and thought importance (ED group) predicted their respective emotional disturbance and disruption. Additionally, control importance (OCD group) and thought-action fusion moral (OCD and ED groups) predicted their emotional disturbance. OCD and ED share the presence of intrusions; however, different variables explain why they are disruptive and emotionally disturbing. Cognitive intrusions require further investigation as a transdiagnostic variable.
本研究旨在比较强迫症 (OCD) 和饮食障碍 (ED) 患者所经历的不必要的侵入性想法,他们的评估,以及他们的控制策略,并分析哪些变量可以预测每组侵入性想法的干扰和情绪困扰。79 名 OCD 患者和 177 名 ED 患者完成了两个等效的自我报告,旨在评估与 OCD 相关和与 ED 相关的侵入性想法、他们的功能失调的评估以及相关的控制策略。OCD 和 ED 患者经历侵入性想法的频率和情绪困扰相当,但 OCD 患者经历的干扰更大。在某些评估和控制策略上,两组之间存在差异。对不确定性的容忍度(OCD 组)和思维重要性(ED 组)预测了他们各自的情绪困扰和干扰。此外,控制重要性(OCD 组)和思维-行动融合道德(OCD 和 ED 组)预测了他们的情绪困扰。OCD 和 ED 都存在侵入性想法;然而,不同的变量解释了为什么它们具有干扰性和情绪困扰性。认知侵入性想法需要进一步研究,作为一种跨诊断变量。