Suppr超能文献

富含血小板的血浆制剂治疗软骨愈合的比较:一项体外研究。

Comparison of platelet-rich plasma formulations for cartilage healing: an in vitro study.

机构信息

SSD RAMSES Laboratory (C.C. and B.G.), Immunorheumatology and Tissue Regeneration Laboratory (E.M. and A.F.), SC Biomechanics and Technology Laboratory (G.F.), SC Orthopedic and Traumatology Clinic (M.M.), and Nano-Biotechnology Laboratory (E.K.), Rizzoli.

Villa Stuart, Sport Rehabilitation Center, Via Trionfale 5952, 00136 Roma, Italy.

出版信息

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Mar 5;96(5):423-9. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.00726.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been advocated as one treatment for cartilage tissue regeneration. To date, several different platelet-rich formulations have been available, but a deep knowledge of their composition and mechanism of action in a specific clinical use is needed. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of various PRP formulations on human chondrocytes in vitro.

METHODS

Blood from ten human volunteers was used to prepare three formulations: (1) PRP with a relatively low concentration of platelets and very few leukocytes (P-PRP), (2) PRP with high concentrations of both platelets and leukocytes (L-PRP), and (3) platelet-poor plasma (PPP). Selected growth factors in the formulations were measured, and the in vitro effects of various concentrations were tested by exposing chondrocytes isolated from osteoarthritic cartilage of four different men and measuring cell proliferation, matrix production, and gene expression.

RESULTS

L-PRP contained the highest levels of growth factors and cytokines. All three formulations stimulated chondrocyte proliferation throughout the culture period evaluated; the only significant difference among the formulations was on day 7, when P-PRP induced greater cell growth compared with the other two formulations. P-PRP stimulated chondrocyte anabolism, as shown by the expression of type-II collagen and aggrecan, whereas L-PRP promoted catabolic pathways involving various cytokines. However, L-PRP induced greater expression of the hyaluronic acid synthase-2 gene and greater production of hyaluronan compared with P-PRP.

CONCLUSIONS

L-PRP and P-PRP induced distinct effects on human articular chondrocytes in vitro, possibly because of differences in the concentrations of platelets, leukocytes, growth factors, and other bioactive molecules. The identification of the optimal amounts and ratios of these blood components could ideally lead to a formulation more suitable for the treatment of cartilage lesions.

摘要

背景

富含血小板的血浆(PRP)已被提倡用于软骨组织再生的一种治疗方法。迄今为止,已有几种不同的富含血小板制剂,但需要深入了解其在特定临床应用中的组成和作用机制。本研究旨在研究不同 PRP 制剂对体外人软骨细胞的影响。

方法

使用来自 10 名志愿者的血液制备了三种制剂:(1)血小板浓度相对较低且白细胞很少的 PRP(P-PRP),(2)血小板和白细胞浓度均较高的 PRP(L-PRP),以及(3)富含血小板的血浆(PPP)。测量制剂中的选定生长因子,并通过暴露于来自四名不同男性的骨关节炎软骨分离的软骨细胞,测试各种浓度的体外作用,测量细胞增殖,基质产生和基因表达。

结果

L-PRP 含有最高水平的生长因子和细胞因子。所有三种制剂在整个评估的培养期间均刺激软骨细胞增殖;制剂之间的唯一显着差异是在第 7 天,与其他两种制剂相比,P-PRP 诱导了更大的细胞生长。P-PRP 刺激软骨细胞合成代谢,如 II 型胶原和聚集蛋白的表达,而 L-PRP 促进涉及各种细胞因子的分解代谢途径。然而,与 P-PRP 相比,L-PRP 诱导了更多的透明质酸合酶-2 基因表达和透明质酸的产生。

结论

L-PRP 和 P-PRP 在体外对人关节软骨细胞产生了不同的影响,可能是由于血小板,白细胞,生长因子和其他生物活性分子的浓度差异所致。确定这些血液成分的最佳量和比例可以理想地导致更适合治疗软骨病变的制剂。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验