Suppr超能文献

《慢性疼痛再生医学治疗的循证临床实践指南:多专业工作组共识报告》

Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines on Regenerative Medicine Treatment for Chronic Pain: A Consensus Report from a Multispecialty Working Group.

作者信息

D'Souza Ryan S, Her Yeng F, Hussain Nasir, Karri Jay, Schatman Michael E, Calodney Aaron K, Lam Christopher, Buchheit Thomas, Boettcher Brennan J, Chang Chien George C, Pritzlaff Scott G, Centeno Christopher, Shapiro Shane A, Klasova Johana, Grider Jay S, Hubbard Ryan, Ege Eliana, Johnson Shelby, Epstein Max H, Kubrova Eva, Ramadan Mohamed Ehab, Moreira Alexandra Michelle, Vardhan Swarnima, Eshraghi Yashar, Javed Saba, Abdullah Newaj M, Christo Paul J, Diwan Sudhir, Hassett Leslie C, Sayed Dawood, Deer Timothy R

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Department of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.

出版信息

J Pain Res. 2024 Sep 11;17:2951-3001. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S480559. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Injectable biologics have not only been described and developed to treat dermal wounds, cardiovascular disease, and cancer, but have also been reported to treat chronic pain conditions. Despite emerging evidence supporting regenerative medicine therapy for pain, many aspects remain controversial.

METHODS

The American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) identified the educational need for an evidence-based guideline on regenerative medicine therapy for chronic pain. The executive board nominated experts spanning multiple specialties including anesthesiology, physical medicine and rehabilitation, and sports medicine based on expertise, publications, research, and clinical practice. A steering committee selected preliminary questions, which were reviewed and refined. Evidence was appraised using the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) criteria for evidence level and degree of recommendation. Using a modified Delphi approach, consensus points were distributed to all collaborators and each collaborator voted on each point. If collaborators provided a decision of "disagree" or "abstain", they were invited to provide a rationale in a non-blinded fashion to the committee chair, who incorporated the respective comments and distributed revised versions to the committee until consensus was achieved.

RESULTS

Sixteen questions were selected for guideline development. Questions that were addressed included type of injectable biologics and mechanism, evidence in treating chronic pain indications (eg, tendinopathy, muscular pathology, osteoarthritis, intervertebral disc disease, neuropathic pain), role in surgical augmentation, dosing, comparative efficacy between injectable biologics, peri-procedural practices to optimize therapeutic response and quality of injectate, federal regulations, and complications with mitigating strategies.

CONCLUSION

In well-selected individuals with certain chronic pain indications, use of injectable biologics may provide superior analgesia, functionality, and/or quality of life compared to conventional medical management or placebo. Future high-quality randomized clinical trials are warranted with implementation of minimum reporting standards, standardization of preparation protocols, investigation of dose-response associations, and comparative analysis between different injectable biologics.

摘要

目的

注射用生物制剂不仅已被描述和开发用于治疗皮肤伤口、心血管疾病和癌症,而且也有报道称可用于治疗慢性疼痛病症。尽管有新证据支持再生医学疗法治疗疼痛,但许多方面仍存在争议。

方法

美国疼痛与神经科学学会(ASPN)确定了对慢性疼痛再生医学疗法循证指南的教育需求。执行委员会根据专业知识、出版物、研究和临床实践,提名了包括麻醉学、物理医学与康复以及运动医学等多个专业的专家。一个指导委员会挑选了初步问题,并进行了审查和完善。使用美国预防服务工作组(USPSTF)的证据水平和推荐程度标准对证据进行评估。采用改良的德尔菲法,将共识点分发给所有合作者,每位合作者对每个点进行投票。如果合作者给出“不同意”或“弃权”的决定,他们会被邀请以非盲法向委员会主席提供理由,主席将各自的意见纳入并向委员会分发修订版,直到达成共识。

结果

选择了16个问题用于制定指南。涉及的问题包括注射用生物制剂的类型和作用机制、治疗慢性疼痛适应症(如肌腱病、肌肉病变、骨关节炎、椎间盘疾病、神经性疼痛)的证据、在手术增强中的作用、剂量、注射用生物制剂之间的比较疗效、优化治疗反应和注射剂质量的围手术期实践、联邦法规以及并发症和缓解策略。

结论

在精心挑选的患有某些慢性疼痛适应症的个体中,与传统医疗管理或安慰剂相比,使用注射用生物制剂可能提供更好的镇痛效果、功能和/或生活质量。未来有必要开展高质量的随机临床试验,实施最低报告标准,规范制备方案,研究剂量反应关系,并对不同注射用生物制剂进行比较分析。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6da6/11402349/baabfc3af499/JPR-17-2951-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验