• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人类通过延迟决策开始时间来优化决策。

Humans optimize decision-making by delaying decision onset.

作者信息

Teichert Tobias, Ferrera Vincent P, Grinband Jack

机构信息

Department of Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America; Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.

Department of Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2014 Mar 5;9(3):e89638. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089638. eCollection 2014.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0089638
PMID:24599295
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3943733/
Abstract

Why do humans make errors on seemingly trivial perceptual decisions? It has been shown that such errors occur in part because the decision process (evidence accumulation) is initiated before selective attention has isolated the relevant sensory information from salient distractors. Nevertheless, it is typically assumed that subjects increase accuracy by prolonging the decision process rather than delaying decision onset. To date it has not been tested whether humans can strategically delay decision onset to increase response accuracy. To address this question we measured the time course of selective attention in a motion interference task using a novel variant of the response signal paradigm. Based on these measurements we estimated time-dependent drift rate and showed that subjects should in principle be able trade speed for accuracy very effectively by delaying decision onset. Using the time-dependent estimate of drift rate we show that subjects indeed delay decision onset in addition to raising response threshold when asked to stress accuracy over speed in a free reaction version of the same motion-interference task. These findings show that decision onset is a critical aspect of the decision process that can be adjusted to effectively improve decision accuracy.

摘要

为什么人类在看似微不足道的感知决策上会犯错?研究表明,此类错误部分是因为在选择性注意将相关感官信息从显著干扰物中分离出来之前,决策过程(证据积累)就已经启动。然而,通常认为受试者是通过延长决策过程而非延迟决策开始来提高准确性的。迄今为止,尚未测试人类是否能够策略性地延迟决策开始以提高反应准确性。为了解决这个问题,我们使用反应信号范式的一种新颖变体,在运动干扰任务中测量了选择性注意的时间进程。基于这些测量,我们估计了随时间变化的漂移率,并表明受试者原则上应该能够通过延迟决策开始非常有效地以速度换取准确性。使用随时间变化的漂移率估计,我们表明在同一运动干扰任务的自由反应版本中,当要求受试者强调准确性而非速度时,他们除了提高反应阈值外,确实会延迟决策开始。这些发现表明,决策开始是决策过程的一个关键方面,可以进行调整以有效提高决策准确性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5ed/3943733/59ae4ef3a3cc/pone.0089638.g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5ed/3943733/9affb410fd39/pone.0089638.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5ed/3943733/5261ea94c7ec/pone.0089638.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5ed/3943733/192d7dc0b01c/pone.0089638.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5ed/3943733/b1c0d36e90f6/pone.0089638.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5ed/3943733/2f2334dd544e/pone.0089638.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5ed/3943733/1a09c1d5d1d8/pone.0089638.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5ed/3943733/a41c84ad4c43/pone.0089638.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5ed/3943733/19701917bc49/pone.0089638.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5ed/3943733/8fdb2875a3a4/pone.0089638.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5ed/3943733/59ae4ef3a3cc/pone.0089638.g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5ed/3943733/9affb410fd39/pone.0089638.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5ed/3943733/5261ea94c7ec/pone.0089638.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5ed/3943733/192d7dc0b01c/pone.0089638.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5ed/3943733/b1c0d36e90f6/pone.0089638.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5ed/3943733/2f2334dd544e/pone.0089638.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5ed/3943733/1a09c1d5d1d8/pone.0089638.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5ed/3943733/a41c84ad4c43/pone.0089638.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5ed/3943733/19701917bc49/pone.0089638.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5ed/3943733/8fdb2875a3a4/pone.0089638.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5ed/3943733/59ae4ef3a3cc/pone.0089638.g010.jpg

相似文献

1
Humans optimize decision-making by delaying decision onset.人类通过延迟决策开始时间来优化决策。
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 5;9(3):e89638. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089638. eCollection 2014.
2
Different effects of dopaminergic medication on perceptual decision-making in Parkinson's disease as a function of task difficulty and speed-accuracy instructions.多巴胺能药物对帕金森病患者知觉决策的不同影响,作为任务难度和速度-准确性指令的函数。
Neuropsychologia. 2015 Aug;75:577-87. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.07.012. Epub 2015 Jul 13.
3
Motion-onset visual evoked potentials predict performance during a global direction discrimination task.运动起始视觉诱发电位预测全局方向辨别任务中的表现。
Neuropsychologia. 2010 Oct;48(12):3563-72. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.08.005. Epub 2010 Aug 14.
4
Speed and accuracy of visual image discrimination by rats.大鼠视觉图像辨别速度和准确性。
Front Neural Circuits. 2013 Dec 18;7:200. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2013.00200. eCollection 2013.
5
Temporal Expectation Hastens Decision Onset But Does Not Affect Evidence Quality.时间预期会加快决策的起始,但不会影响证据的质量。
J Neurosci. 2021 Jan 6;41(1):130-143. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1103-20.2020. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
6
The speed and accuracy of perceptual decisions in a random-tone pitch task.随机音调音高任务中感知决策的速度和准确性。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2013 Jul;75(5):1048-58. doi: 10.3758/s13414-013-0447-8.
7
Perceptual discrimination in static and dynamic noise: the temporal relation between perceptual encoding and decision making.静态和动态噪声中的感知辨别:感知编码和决策之间的时间关系。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2010 Feb;139(1):70-94. doi: 10.1037/a0018128.
8
fMRI evidence for a dual process account of the speed-accuracy tradeoff in decision-making.功能性磁共振成像(fMRI)证据支持决策中速度-准确性权衡的双过程理论。
PLoS One. 2008 Jul 9;3(7):e2635. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002635.
9
Elapsed decision time affects the weighting of prior probability in a perceptual decision task.决策时间的流逝会影响感知决策任务中先验概率的权重。
J Neurosci. 2011 Apr 27;31(17):6339-52. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5613-10.2011.
10
The optimality of sensory processing during the speed-accuracy tradeoff.在速度-准确性权衡中进行感觉处理的最优性。
J Neurosci. 2012 Jun 6;32(23):7992-8003. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0340-12.2012.

引用本文的文献

1
The forced-response method: A new chronometric approach to measure conflict processing.强迫反应法:一种测量冲突处理的新计时方法。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Dec 12;57(1):15. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02516-y.
2
An Evaluative Review of Barriers to Critical Thinking in Educational and Real-World Settings.对教育及现实世界环境中批判性思维障碍的评估性综述
J Intell. 2023 May 31;11(6):105. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11060105.
3
Pupillary dynamics reflect the impact of temporal expectation on detection strategy.瞳孔动态反映了时间预期对检测策略的影响。

本文引用的文献

1
Contrast dependence of smooth pursuit eye movements following a saccade to superimposed targets.扫视追随眼动对叠加目标的对比依赖性。
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e37888. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037888. Epub 2012 May 21.
2
From salience to saccades: multiple-alternative gated stochastic accumulator model of visual search.从凸显到眼跳:视觉搜索的多选门控随机累积器模型。
J Neurosci. 2012 Mar 7;32(10):3433-46. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4622-11.2012.
3
Reinforcement-based decision making in corticostriatal circuits: mutual constraints by neurocomputational and diffusion models.
iScience. 2023 Jan 16;26(2):106000. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.106000. eCollection 2023 Feb 17.
4
Humans utilize sensory evidence of others' intended action to make online decisions.人类利用他人意图动作的感官证据来做出在线决策。
Sci Rep. 2022 May 25;12(1):8806. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-12662-y.
5
Timescales of Cognition in the Brain.大脑认知的时间尺度
Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2021 Oct;41:30-37. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.03.003. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
6
Static magnetic field stimulation of the supplementary motor area modulates resting-state activity and motor behavior.静磁场刺激辅助运动区调节静息状态活动和运动行为。
Commun Biol. 2019 Oct 31;2:397. doi: 10.1038/s42003-019-0643-8. eCollection 2019.
7
Time-delay model of perceptual decision making in cortical networks.皮质网络中知觉决策的时滞模型。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 15;14(2):e0211885. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211885. eCollection 2019.
8
Dynamic Interplay of Value and Sensory Information in High-Speed Decision Making.高速决策中价值与感觉信息的动态相互作用。
Curr Biol. 2018 Mar 5;28(5):795-802.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.01.071. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
9
Detecting changes in dynamic and complex acoustic environments.检测动态和复杂声学环境中的变化。
Elife. 2017 Mar 6;6:e24910. doi: 10.7554/eLife.24910.
10
Policing Fish at Boston's Museum of Science: Studying Audiovisual Interaction in the Wild.在波士顿科学博物馆对鱼类进行监测:研究野外的视听交互
Iperception. 2015 Aug 21;6(4):2041669515599332. doi: 10.1177/2041669515599332. eCollection 2015 Aug.
基于强化的皮质纹状体回路决策:神经计算和扩散模型的相互约束。
Neural Comput. 2012 May;24(5):1186-229. doi: 10.1162/NECO_a_00270. Epub 2012 Feb 1.
4
Diffusion models of the flanker task: discrete versus gradual attentional selection.Flanker 任务的扩散模型:离散与渐变注意选择。
Cogn Psychol. 2011 Dec;63(4):210-38. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.08.001. Epub 2011 Oct 1.
5
Multialternative drift-diffusion model predicts the relationship between visual fixations and choice in value-based decisions.多选项漂移扩散模型预测了基于价值的决策中视觉注视点与选择之间的关系。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Aug 16;108(33):13852-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1101328108. Epub 2011 Aug 1.
6
Perceived global flow direction reveals local vector weighting by luminance.感知到的全局流动方向揭示了亮度的局部矢量加权。
Vision Res. 2011 May 25;51(10):1129-36. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.03.003. Epub 2011 Mar 17.
7
Neurally constrained modeling of perceptual decision making.基于神经约束的感知决策建模。
Psychol Rev. 2010 Oct;117(4):1113-43. doi: 10.1037/a0020311.
8
Initiation and termination of integration in a decision process.在决策过程中的整合的启动和终止。
Neural Netw. 2010 Apr;23(3):322-33. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2009.11.015. Epub 2009 Dec 3.
9
An integrated theory of attention and decision making in visual signal detection.视觉信号检测中注意力与决策的综合理论。
Psychol Rev. 2009 Apr;116(2):283-317. doi: 10.1037/a0015156.
10
The diffusion decision model: theory and data for two-choice decision tasks.扩散决策模型:二选一决策任务的理论与数据
Neural Comput. 2008 Apr;20(4):873-922. doi: 10.1162/neco.2008.12-06-420.