Lee Taraz G, Sellers Jacob, Jonides John, Zhang Han
Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Dec 12;57(1):15. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02516-y.
Despite long-standing concerns about the use of free reaction times (RTs) in cognitive psychology, they remain a prevalent measure of conflict resolution. This report presents the forced-response method as a fresh approach to examine speed-accuracy trade-off functions (SATs) in conflict tasks. The method involves fixing the overall response time, varying the onset of stimuli, and observing response expression. We applied this method to an arrow flanker task. By systematically varying the time between stimulus onset and response, we reveal a comprehensive time course of the flanker interference effect that is rarely observed in previous literature. We further show that influential manipulations observed in free-RT paradigms similarly affect accuracy within the forced-response technique, suggesting that the forced-response method retains the core cognitive processing characteristics of traditional free-RT conflict tasks. As a behavioral method that examines the time course of cognitive processing, the forced-response method provides a novel and more nuanced look into the dynamics of conflict resolution.
尽管认知心理学界长期以来一直对使用自由反应时(RTs)存在担忧,但它们仍然是解决冲突的一种普遍测量方法。本报告提出了强制反应法,作为一种在冲突任务中检验速度-准确性权衡函数(SATs)的新方法。该方法包括固定总体反应时间、改变刺激的起始时间,并观察反应表现。我们将此方法应用于箭头侧翼任务。通过系统地改变刺激开始与反应之间的时间,我们揭示了侧翼干扰效应的完整时间进程,这在以往文献中很少被观察到。我们进一步表明,在自由反应时范式中观察到的有影响的操作在强制反应技术中同样会影响准确性,这表明强制反应法保留了传统自由反应时冲突任务的核心认知加工特征。作为一种检验认知加工时间进程的行为方法,强制反应法为冲突解决的动态过程提供了一种新颖且更细致入微的视角。