Simeonsson Rune J, Lollar Don, Björck-Åkesson Eva, Granlund Mats, Brown Scott C, Zhuoying Qiu, Gray David, Pan Yi
School of Education, University of North Carolina , Chapel Hill, NC , USA .
Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(25):2187-94. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.892638. Epub 2014 Mar 7.
The aim of this article is to examine the component of "personal factors" described as a contextual factor in the ICF and ICF-CY.
A critical examination of the construct of "personal factors" and description of the component was made with reference to conceptual and taxonomic criteria.
The "personal factors" component in the ICF/ICF-CY is not defined, there is no taxonomy of codes, there is no explicit purpose stated for its use and no guidelines are provided for its application. In spite of these constraints, the component of "personal factors" is being applied as part of the classifications. Such uncontrolled applications constitute significant risks for the status of ICF/ICF-CY as the WHO reference classification in that: (a) the component is accepted for use by default simply by being applied; (b) component content is expanded with idiosyncratic exemplars by users; and (c) there is potential misuse of "personal factors" in documenting personal attributes, including "blaming the victim".
In the absence of formal codes, any application of the component of "personal factors" lacks the legitimacy that documentation with a scientific taxonomy should provide. Given the growing use of the ICF/ICF-CY globally, a priority for the revision process should be to determine if there is in fact need for "personal" or any other factors in the ICF/ICF-CY.
A central contribution of the ICF/ICF-CY is the universal language of codes for the components of body structure, body function, activities and participation and Environmental Factors. As such the codes provide taxonomical legitimacy and power for documenting dimensions of functioning and disability in clinical and rehabilitation contexts. As there are no codes of "personal factors", there is no basis for documentation of the component. Demographic information, if needed for identification, should be recorded in customary formats, independent of any component or codes of the ICF/ICF-CY.
本文旨在探讨《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》(ICF)及《儿童国际功能、残疾和健康分类》(ICF-CY)中被描述为背景因素的“个人因素”组成部分。
参照概念和分类标准对“个人因素”的结构及该组成部分的描述进行批判性审视。
ICF/ICF-CY中的“个人因素”组成部分未被定义,没有编码分类法,未阐明其使用的明确目的,也未提供应用指南。尽管存在这些限制,“个人因素”组成部分仍被用作分类的一部分。这种不受控制的应用对ICF/ICF-CY作为世界卫生组织参考分类的地位构成重大风险,具体表现为:(a)该组成部分仅因被应用就默认被接受使用;(b)用户用特殊示例扩展了组成部分的内容;(c)在记录个人属性时可能滥用“个人因素”,包括“指责受害者”。
在缺乏正式编码的情况下,“个人因素”组成部分的任何应用都缺乏科学分类法记录应提供的合法性。鉴于ICF/ICF-CY在全球的使用日益增加,修订过程的一个优先事项应是确定ICF/ICF-CY中是否真的需要“个人”或任何其他因素。
ICF/ICF-CY的一个核心贡献是为身体结构、身体功能、活动与参与以及环境因素的组成部分提供了通用的编码语言。因此,这些编码为在临床和康复环境中记录功能和残疾维度提供了分类合法性和权威性。由于没有“个人因素”的编码,所以没有记录该组成部分的依据。如果出于识别需要人口统计信息,应以常规格式记录,独立于ICF/ICF-CY的任何组成部分或编码。