• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分层医师网络对患者选择的影响。

The impact of tiered physician networks on patient choices.

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Rm 433, Boston, MA 02115.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2014 Aug;49(4):1348-63. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12165. Epub 2014 Mar 11.

DOI:10.1111/1475-6773.12165
PMID:24611599
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4239853/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether patient choice of physician or health plan was affected by physician tier-rankings.

DATA SOURCES

Administrative claims and enrollment data on 171,581 nonelderly beneficiaries enrolled in Massachusetts Group Insurance Commission health plans that include a tiered physician network and who had an office visit with a tiered physician.

STUDY DESIGN

We estimate the impact of tier-rankings on physician market share within a plan of new patients and on the percent of a physician's patients who switch to other physicians with fixed effects regression models. The effect of tiering on consumer plan choice is estimated using logistic regression and a pre-post study design.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Physicians in the bottom (least-preferred) tier, particularly certain specialist physicians, had lower market share of new patient visits than physicians with higher tier-rankings. Patients whose physician was in the bottom tier were more likely to switch health plans. There was no effect of tier-ranking on patients switching away from physicians whom they have seen previously.

CONCLUSIONS

The effect of tiering appears to be among patients who choose new physicians and at the lower end of the distribution of tiered physicians, rather than moving patients to the "best" performers. These findings suggest strong loyalty of patients to physicians more likely to be considered their personal doctor.

摘要

目的

评估患者对医生或医疗计划的选择是否受到医生层级排名的影响。

资料来源

马萨诸塞州团体保险委员会健康计划中 171581 名非老年受益人的行政索赔和登记数据,这些计划包括一个分层医生网络,并且有一位分层医生的门诊就诊记录。

研究设计

我们使用固定效应回归模型估计层级排名对计划内新患者医生市场份额以及医生患者中转向其他医生的比例的影响。使用逻辑回归和前后研究设计来估计分层对消费者计划选择的影响。

主要发现

底层(最不受欢迎)的医生,特别是某些专科医生,新患者就诊的市场份额低于排名较高的医生。其医生在底层的患者更有可能更换医疗计划。层级排名对从之前看过的医生那里转走的患者没有影响。

结论

分层的影响似乎在选择新医生的患者中以及在分层医生分布的低端存在,而不是将患者转移到“最佳”医生那里。这些发现表明,患者对更有可能被认为是他们私人医生的医生有强烈的忠诚度。

相似文献

1
The impact of tiered physician networks on patient choices.分层医师网络对患者选择的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2014 Aug;49(4):1348-63. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12165. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
2
Variations in patient response to tiered physician networks.患者对分级医生网络的反应差异。
Am J Manag Care. 2016 Jun;22(6):420-5.
3
How do quality information and cost affect patient choice of provider in a tiered network setting? Results from a survey.在分层网络环境中,质量信息和成本如何影响患者对提供者的选择?一项调查的结果。
Health Serv Res. 2011 Apr;46(2):437-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01217.x. Epub 2010 Dec 9.
4
Tiered Physician Network Plans and Patient Choices of Specialist Physicians.分层医师网络计划与专科医师的患者选择。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Nov 1;6(11):e2341836. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.41836.
5
The impact of tiered physician networks on patient choices.分层医生网络对患者选择的影响。
Find Brief. 2014 Sep;42(3):1-2.
6
Physician tiering by health plans in Massachusetts.马萨诸塞州的医疗计划对医生进行分级。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Sep 15;92(12):2204-9. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.01080.
7
Consumer experience with a tiered physician network: early evidence.消费者对分层医师网络的体验:早期证据。
Am J Manag Care. 2010 Feb;16(2):123-30.
8
Tiered network health plans and changes in physician practice intensity.分层网络健康计划与医生执业强度的变化。
Health Serv Res. 2024 Feb;59(1):e14163. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14163. Epub 2023 May 1.
9
The Impact of a Tiered Network on Hospital Choice.分层网络对医院选择的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2015 Oct;50(5):1628-48. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12291. Epub 2015 Mar 9.
10
The effect of a three-tier formulary on antidepressant utilization and expenditures.三层药品目录对抗抑郁药使用及费用的影响。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2008 Jun;11(2):67-77.

引用本文的文献

1
How exposure to patient narratives affects stereotyped choices of primary care clinicians.患者叙述的接触如何影响初级保健临床医生的刻板选择。
PLoS One. 2023 Dec 7;18(12):e0295243. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295243. eCollection 2023.
2
Tiered Physician Network Plans and Patient Choices of Specialist Physicians.分层医师网络计划与专科医师的患者选择。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Nov 1;6(11):e2341836. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.41836.
3
Role of prices in driving the variation in spending across medical groups.价格在驱动医疗组之间支出差异中的作用。
Health Serv Res. 2023 Dec;58(6):1164-1171. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14207. Epub 2023 Aug 1.
4
Tiered network health plans and changes in physician practice intensity.分层网络健康计划与医生执业强度的变化。
Health Serv Res. 2024 Feb;59(1):e14163. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14163. Epub 2023 May 1.
5
Price Effects Of Vertical Integration And Joint Contracting Between Physicians And Hospitals In Massachusetts.马萨诸塞州的医生和医院之间的垂直整合和联合合同的价格效应。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2022 May;41(5):741-750. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2021.00727.
6
Pharmacy switching in response to preferred pharmacy networks in Medicare Part D.医疗保险处方药部分中对首选药房网络的反应导致的药房转换。
Health Serv Res. 2022 Oct;57(5):1112-1120. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13973. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
7
The Impact of Narrow and Tiered Networks on Costs, Access, Quality, and Patient Steering: A Systematic Review.窄带和分层网络对成本、可及性、质量和患者引导的影响:系统评价。
Med Care Res Rev. 2022 Oct;79(5):607-617. doi: 10.1177/10775587211055923. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
8
Clinic price reductions in a tiered total cost benefit design.按阶梯式总成本效益设计降低诊所价格。
Am J Manag Care. 2021 Sep 1;27(9):e316-e321. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2021.88744.
9
Characteristics Related to Choice of Obstetrician-Gynecologist among Women of Ethiopian Descent in Israel.以色列埃塞俄比亚裔女性选择妇产科医生的相关特征。
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Oct 30;8(4):444. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8040444.
10
Fee-for-service payment is not the (main) problem.按服务项目收费不是(主要)问题。
Health Serv Res. 2020 Aug;55(4):491-495. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13316.

本文引用的文献

1
Keeping score under a global payment system.在全球支付系统下计分。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Feb 2;366(5):393-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1112637.
2
Do bad report cards have consequences? Impacts of publicly reported provider quality information on the CABG market in Pennsylvania.不良报告卡是否有后果?宾夕法尼亚州公开报告的供应商质量信息对 CABG 市场的影响。
J Health Econ. 2011 Mar;30(2):392-407. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2010.11.006. Epub 2010 Dec 10.
3
The impact of health plan physician-tiering on access to care.医疗机构医生层级设置对医疗服务可及性的影响。
J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Apr;26(4):440-5. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1607-3. Epub 2010 Dec 23.
4
How do quality information and cost affect patient choice of provider in a tiered network setting? Results from a survey.在分层网络环境中,质量信息和成本如何影响患者对提供者的选择?一项调查的结果。
Health Serv Res. 2011 Apr;46(2):437-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01217.x. Epub 2010 Dec 9.
5
Consumer experience with a tiered physician network: early evidence.消费者对分层医师网络的体验:早期证据。
Am J Manag Care. 2010 Feb;16(2):123-30.
6
Quality and consumer decision making in the market for health insurance and health care services.健康保险和医疗服务市场中的质量与消费者决策
Med Care Res Rev. 2009 Feb;66(1 Suppl):28S-52S. doi: 10.1177/1077558708325887. Epub 2008 Nov 24.
7
Steering patients to safer hospitals? The effect of a tiered hospital network on hospital admissions.引导患者前往更安全的医院?分层医院网络对住院情况的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2008 Oct;43(5 Pt 2):1849-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2008.00889.x. Epub 2008 Aug 29.
8
Do managed care plans' tiered networks lead to inequities in care for minority patients?管理式医疗计划的分层网络是否会导致少数族裔患者在医疗护理方面的不平等?
Health Aff (Millwood). 2008 Jul-Aug;27(4):1160-6. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.4.1160.
9
Start spreading the news: a structural estimate of the effects of New York hospital report cards.开始传播这一消息:纽约医院报告卡影响的结构估计。
J Health Econ. 2008 Sep;27(5):1201-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.03.001. Epub 2008 Mar 15.
10
Prescription drug cost sharing: associations with medication and medical utilization and spending and health.处方药费用分担:与药物使用、医疗利用、支出及健康的关联
JAMA. 2007 Jul 4;298(1):61-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.1.61.