• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分层网络对医院选择的影响。

The Impact of a Tiered Network on Hospital Choice.

作者信息

Frank Matthew B, Hsu John, Landrum Mary Beth, Chernew Michael E

机构信息

Harvard Law School, Harvard University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Program in Health Policy, Cambridge, MA.

Program for Clinical Economics and Policy Analysis, Mongan Institute for Health Policy, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2015 Oct;50(5):1628-48. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12291. Epub 2015 Mar 9.

DOI:10.1111/1475-6773.12291
PMID:25752219
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4600365/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of a tiered network on hospital choice for scheduled admissions.

DATA

The 2009-2012 patient-level claims data from Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts (BCBSMA).

STUDY DESIGN

BCBSMA's three-tiered hospital network employs large differential cost sharing to encourage patients to seek care at hospitals on the preferred tier. During the study period, 44 percent of hospitals were moved to a different tier based on changes in cost or quality performance. We relied on this longitudinal variation for identification and specified conditional logit models to estimate the effect of the tiered network (TN) on patients' hospital choices relative to a non-TN comparison group.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

The TN was associated with increased use of hospitals on the preferred and middle tiers relative to the nonpreferred tier for planned admissions. The results suggest that if all members were in a TN plan, relative to all members being in a non-TN plan, scheduled admissions to hospitals on the nonpreferred tier would drop by 7.6 percentage points, while those to middle and preferred tier hospitals would rise by 0.9 and 6.6 percentage points, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Differential cost sharing can steer patients toward preferred hospitals for planned admissions.

摘要

目的

评估分层网络对择期住院患者医院选择的影响。

数据

来自马萨诸塞州蓝十字蓝盾(BCBSMA)2009 - 2012年患者层面的理赔数据。

研究设计

BCBSMA的三层医院网络采用大幅差异化成本分担方式,鼓励患者前往首选层级的医院就医。在研究期间,44%的医院因成本或质量表现的变化而被调整到不同层级。我们依靠这种纵向变化进行识别,并指定条件logit模型来估计分层网络(TN)相对于非TN对照组对患者医院选择的影响。

主要发现

与非首选层级相比,TN与计划住院时首选和中间层级医院的使用增加有关。结果表明,如果所有成员都参加TN计划,相对于所有成员都参加非TN计划,非首选层级医院的择期住院率将下降7.6个百分点,而中间层级和首选层级医院的择期住院率将分别上升0.9个和6.6个百分点。

结论

差异化成本分担可以引导患者选择首选医院进行择期住院。

相似文献

1
The Impact of a Tiered Network on Hospital Choice.分层网络对医院选择的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2015 Oct;50(5):1628-48. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12291. Epub 2015 Mar 9.
2
The impact of tiered physician networks on patient choices.分层医师网络对患者选择的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2014 Aug;49(4):1348-63. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12165. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
3
How do quality information and cost affect patient choice of provider in a tiered network setting? Results from a survey.在分层网络环境中,质量信息和成本如何影响患者对提供者的选择?一项调查的结果。
Health Serv Res. 2011 Apr;46(2):437-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01217.x. Epub 2010 Dec 9.
4
Variations in patient response to tiered physician networks.患者对分级医生网络的反应差异。
Am J Manag Care. 2016 Jun;22(6):420-5.
5
Tiered Physician Network Plans and Patient Choices of Specialist Physicians.分层医师网络计划与专科医师的患者选择。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Nov 1;6(11):e2341836. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.41836.
6
Consumer experience with a tiered physician network: early evidence.消费者对分层医师网络的体验:早期证据。
Am J Manag Care. 2010 Feb;16(2):123-30.
7
Will choice-based reform work for Medicare? Evidence from the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program.基于选择的改革对医疗保险是否有效?来自联邦雇员健康福利计划的证据。
Health Serv Res. 2006 Oct;41(5):1741-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00580.x.
8
Effect of tiered prescription copayments on the use of preferred brand medications.分级处方自付费用对首选品牌药物使用的影响。
Med Care. 2003 Mar;41(3):398-406. doi: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000053022.47132.82.
9
Association between health insurance cost-sharing and choice of hospital tier for cardiovascular diseases in China: a prospective cohort study.中国心血管疾病医疗保险费用分担与医院层级选择之间的关联:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2024 Feb 14;45:101020. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101020. eCollection 2024 Apr.
10
Three-tiered-copayment drug coverage and use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.三层自付费用药物覆盖范围与非甾体抗炎药的使用
Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(15):1679-84. doi: 10.1001/archinte.164.15.1679.

引用本文的文献

1
Clustering affordable care act qualified health plans to understand how and where insurance facilitates or impedes access to HIV prevention.将平价医疗法案合格健康计划进行聚类,以了解保险如何以及在何处促进或阻碍艾滋病毒预防。
AIDS Res Ther. 2024 Nov 19;21(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12981-024-00674-9.
2
Tiered Physician Network Plans and Patient Choices of Specialist Physicians.分层医师网络计划与专科医师的患者选择。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Nov 1;6(11):e2341836. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.41836.
3
Tiered network health plans and changes in physician practice intensity.分层网络健康计划与医生执业强度的变化。
Health Serv Res. 2024 Feb;59(1):e14163. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14163. Epub 2023 May 1.
4
Price Effects Of Vertical Integration And Joint Contracting Between Physicians And Hospitals In Massachusetts.马萨诸塞州的医生和医院之间的垂直整合和联合合同的价格效应。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2022 May;41(5):741-750. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2021.00727.
5
Pharmacy switching in response to preferred pharmacy networks in Medicare Part D.医疗保险处方药部分中对首选药房网络的反应导致的药房转换。
Health Serv Res. 2022 Oct;57(5):1112-1120. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13973. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
6
The Impact of Narrow and Tiered Networks on Costs, Access, Quality, and Patient Steering: A Systematic Review.窄带和分层网络对成本、可及性、质量和患者引导的影响:系统评价。
Med Care Res Rev. 2022 Oct;79(5):607-617. doi: 10.1177/10775587211055923. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
7
Are value-based incentives driving behavior change to improve value?基于价值的激励措施是否正在推动行为改变以提高价值?
Am J Manag Care. 2019 Feb 1;25(2):e26-e32.
8
Patient responsiveness to a differential deductible: empirical results from The Netherlands.患者对差异免赔额的反应:来自荷兰的实证结果。
Eur J Health Econ. 2019 Jun;20(4):513-524. doi: 10.1007/s10198-018-1014-y. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
9
The moral hazard effects of consumer responses to targeted cost-sharing.消费者对有针对性的成本分担做出反应的道德风险效应。
J Health Econ. 2017 Dec;56:201-221. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2017.09.012. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
10
Using the deductible for patient channeling: did preferred providers gain patient volume?利用免赔额进行患者分流:优先医疗机构的患者数量增加了吗?
Eur J Health Econ. 2016 Jun;17(5):645-52. doi: 10.1007/s10198-015-0711-z. Epub 2015 Aug 1.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of tiered physician networks on patient choices.分层医师网络对患者选择的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2014 Aug;49(4):1348-63. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12165. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
2
After the false start--what can we expect from the new health insurance marketplaces?
N Engl J Med. 2014 Jan 30;370(5):393-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1315956. Epub 2014 Jan 15.
3
Increases in consumer cost sharing redirect patient volumes and reduce hospital prices for orthopedic surgery.消费者分担成本的增加会改变患者的流量,并降低骨科手术的医院价格。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Aug;32(8):1392-7. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0188.
4
The effect of a large regional health plan's value-based insurance design program on statin use.大型区域健康计划基于价值的保险设计方案对他汀类药物使用的影响。
Med Care. 2012 Nov;50(11):934-9. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31826c8630.
5
Health care spending and quality in year 1 of the alternative quality contract.替代质量合同的第 1 年的医疗保健支出和质量。
N Engl J Med. 2011 Sep 8;365(10):909-18. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1101416. Epub 2011 Jul 13.
6
Two-year trends in colorectal cancer screening after switch to a high-deductible health plan.高免赔额健康计划实施后对结直肠癌筛查的两年趋势变化
Med Care. 2011 Sep;49(9):865-71. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31821b35d8.
7
A value-based insurance design program at a large company boosted medication adherence for employees with chronic illnesses.一家大公司的基于价值的保险设计方案提高了慢性病员工的药物依从性。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Jan;30(1):109-17. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0510.
8
Value-based insurance plus disease management increased medication use and produced savings.基于价值的保险加上疾病管理增加了药物的使用并产生了节约。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Jan;30(1):100-8. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0896.
9
Copayment reductions generate greater medication adherence in targeted patients.自付额降低可提高目标患者的药物依从性。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Nov;29(11):2002-8. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0571.
10
At Pitney Bowes, value-based insurance design cut copayments and increased drug adherence.在必能宝公司,基于价值的保险设计降低了共付额,提高了药物依从性。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Nov;29(11):1995-2001. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0336.