Dedding Christine, Reis Ria, Wolf Bart, Hardon Anita
Amsterdam Institute for Social Science Research, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Athena Institute, Free University, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Health Expect. 2015 Dec;18(6):2121-8. doi: 10.1111/hex.12180. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
Interactions with children in clinical settings are often criticized because parents and medical professionals speak for children rather than to them. Such approaches do not take the agency of children into account.
First, to examine how children enact agency in a clinical encounter and draw lessons from this to improve health-care practices for children and, second, to explain how looking at agency might help to move the participation agenda forwards.
A qualitative study incorporating a range of methods, including participant observation, interviews and focus group discussions.
Three hospitals in the Netherlands.
Children with diabetes type 1, between 8 and 12 years (n = 30), parents (n = 22) and medical professionals (n = 16).
Children do not simply accept the recurrent health education from medical professionals. Instead, they attribute their own personal meaning to their disease and treatment. Drawing from their years of experience with the disease and health care and the image of a passive and vulnerable child, they actively find ways to balance personal goals with medically defined goals.
Efforts to facilitate child participation should be based on insights into the ways in which children enact agency in the clinical encounter. Our data show that children already participate in health care and that their enactment of agency is based on a practical logic. Understanding of children's current participation and agency is needed to more successfully attune their treatment to their daily lives with diabetes. This is crucial for the success of treatment and the well-being of children.
在临床环境中与儿童的互动常常受到批评,因为家长和医疗专业人员替儿童发言而非与他们交流。此类方式没有考虑到儿童的自主性。
第一,研究儿童在临床诊疗过程中如何展现自主性,并从中吸取经验教训以改善儿童医疗保健实践;第二,解释关注自主性如何有助于推动参与议程的发展。
一项采用多种方法的定性研究,包括参与观察、访谈和焦点小组讨论。
荷兰的三家医院。
1型糖尿病患儿,年龄在8至12岁之间(n = 30),家长(n = 22)和医疗专业人员(n = 16)。
儿童并非简单地接受医疗专业人员反复进行的健康教育。相反,他们赋予自身疾病和治疗以个人意义。基于多年与疾病和医疗保健打交道的经验以及被动脆弱儿童的形象,他们积极寻找方法,在个人目标与医学规定的目标之间取得平衡。
促进儿童参与的努力应基于对儿童在临床诊疗过程中展现自主性方式的深入理解。我们的数据表明,儿童已经参与到医疗保健中,且他们展现自主性是基于一种实践逻辑。需要了解儿童当前的参与情况和自主性,以便更成功地使他们的治疗与糖尿病患者的日常生活相协调。这对于治疗的成功和儿童的福祉至关重要。