Fefer Paul, Beigel Roy, Rosenberg Nurit, Shechter Michael, Gannot Sharon, Varon David, Savion Naphthali, Hod Hanoch, Matetzky Shlomi
Leviev Heart Center .
Platelets. 2015;26(2):127-31. doi: 10.3109/09537104.2014.888410. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
High-post clopidogrel platelet reactivity in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients is associated with adverse outcomes and may be related to clopidogrel dosing. Clinical studies evaluating different clopidogrel doses have resulted in conflicting conclusions. Clopidogrel dosing regimens have evolved over time, enabling us to evaluate platelet reactivity in real-life ACS patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and treated with three different clopidogrel doses. Platelet reactivity was assessed with light transmitted aggregometry on the third day post clopidogrel loading in 404 consecutive ACS patients. Of them, 198 were treated with a standard regimen (300 mg loading, 75 mg/day maintenance dose), 95 with a high loading regimen (600 mg loading, 75 mg/day maintenance dose) and 111 with a high loading/high maintenance regimen (600 mg loading, 150 mg/day maintenance). Compared with the standard regimen, the high loading regimen resulted in significantly lower mean platelet reactivity to adenosine diphosphate (ADP) with a lower proportion of patients exhibiting clopidogrel non-responsiveness (11% vs. 28%, p = 0.004). Compared with the high loading regimen, the high loading/high maintenance regimen resulted in significantly lower mean platelet reactivity to ADP, but without a further drop in the number of non-responders (8.1% vs. 11%, p = 0.16). In conclusion, greater overall inhibition can be achieved with higher loading and maintenance doses in ACS patients. However, despite high clopidogrel doses, a sizable proportion of patients remained "resistant" to the effects of clopidogrel.
急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者中氯吡格雷高负荷后血小板反应性与不良预后相关,且可能与氯吡格雷剂量有关。评估不同氯吡格雷剂量的临床研究得出了相互矛盾的结论。氯吡格雷给药方案随时间不断演变,这使我们能够评估接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗并接受三种不同氯吡格雷剂量治疗的现实生活中的ACS患者的血小板反应性。在404例连续的ACS患者中,于氯吡格雷负荷后第三天用透光率聚集法评估血小板反应性。其中,198例接受标准方案治疗(负荷剂量300 mg,维持剂量75 mg/天),95例接受高负荷方案治疗(负荷剂量600 mg,维持剂量75 mg/天),111例接受高负荷/高维持方案治疗(负荷剂量600 mg,维持剂量150 mg/天)。与标准方案相比,高负荷方案导致对二磷酸腺苷(ADP)的平均血小板反应性显著降低,氯吡格雷无反应的患者比例更低(11%对28%,p = 0.004)。与高负荷方案相比,高负荷/高维持方案导致对ADP的平均血小板反应性显著降低,但无反应者数量没有进一步下降(8.1%对11%,p = 0.16)。总之,在ACS患者中,更高的负荷剂量和维持剂量可实现更大的总体抑制作用。然而,尽管氯吡格雷剂量很高,但仍有相当比例的患者对氯吡格雷的作用“抵抗”。