• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床实践中急性冠状动脉综合征患者对不同氯吡格雷给药方案的血小板反应评估。

Evaluation of platelet response to different clopidogrel dosing regimens in patients with acute coronary syndrome in clinical practice.

作者信息

Fefer Paul, Beigel Roy, Rosenberg Nurit, Shechter Michael, Gannot Sharon, Varon David, Savion Naphthali, Hod Hanoch, Matetzky Shlomi

机构信息

Leviev Heart Center .

出版信息

Platelets. 2015;26(2):127-31. doi: 10.3109/09537104.2014.888410. Epub 2014 Mar 11.

DOI:10.3109/09537104.2014.888410
PMID:24617352
Abstract

High-post clopidogrel platelet reactivity in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients is associated with adverse outcomes and may be related to clopidogrel dosing. Clinical studies evaluating different clopidogrel doses have resulted in conflicting conclusions. Clopidogrel dosing regimens have evolved over time, enabling us to evaluate platelet reactivity in real-life ACS patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and treated with three different clopidogrel doses. Platelet reactivity was assessed with light transmitted aggregometry on the third day post clopidogrel loading in 404 consecutive ACS patients. Of them, 198 were treated with a standard regimen (300 mg loading, 75 mg/day maintenance dose), 95 with a high loading regimen (600 mg loading, 75 mg/day maintenance dose) and 111 with a high loading/high maintenance regimen (600 mg loading, 150 mg/day maintenance). Compared with the standard regimen, the high loading regimen resulted in significantly lower mean platelet reactivity to adenosine diphosphate (ADP) with a lower proportion of patients exhibiting clopidogrel non-responsiveness (11% vs. 28%, p = 0.004). Compared with the high loading regimen, the high loading/high maintenance regimen resulted in significantly lower mean platelet reactivity to ADP, but without a further drop in the number of non-responders (8.1% vs. 11%, p = 0.16). In conclusion, greater overall inhibition can be achieved with higher loading and maintenance doses in ACS patients. However, despite high clopidogrel doses, a sizable proportion of patients remained "resistant" to the effects of clopidogrel.

摘要

急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者中氯吡格雷高负荷后血小板反应性与不良预后相关,且可能与氯吡格雷剂量有关。评估不同氯吡格雷剂量的临床研究得出了相互矛盾的结论。氯吡格雷给药方案随时间不断演变,这使我们能够评估接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗并接受三种不同氯吡格雷剂量治疗的现实生活中的ACS患者的血小板反应性。在404例连续的ACS患者中,于氯吡格雷负荷后第三天用透光率聚集法评估血小板反应性。其中,198例接受标准方案治疗(负荷剂量300 mg,维持剂量75 mg/天),95例接受高负荷方案治疗(负荷剂量600 mg,维持剂量75 mg/天),111例接受高负荷/高维持方案治疗(负荷剂量600 mg,维持剂量150 mg/天)。与标准方案相比,高负荷方案导致对二磷酸腺苷(ADP)的平均血小板反应性显著降低,氯吡格雷无反应的患者比例更低(11%对28%,p = 0.004)。与高负荷方案相比,高负荷/高维持方案导致对ADP的平均血小板反应性显著降低,但无反应者数量没有进一步下降(8.1%对11%,p = 0.16)。总之,在ACS患者中,更高的负荷剂量和维持剂量可实现更大的总体抑制作用。然而,尽管氯吡格雷剂量很高,但仍有相当比例的患者对氯吡格雷的作用“抵抗”。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of platelet response to different clopidogrel dosing regimens in patients with acute coronary syndrome in clinical practice.临床实践中急性冠状动脉综合征患者对不同氯吡格雷给药方案的血小板反应评估。
Platelets. 2015;26(2):127-31. doi: 10.3109/09537104.2014.888410. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
2
High Platelet Reactivity in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Prasugrel and Clopidogrel.接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者的高血小板反应性:比较普拉格雷和氯吡格雷的随机对照试验
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 28;10(8):e0135037. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135037. eCollection 2015.
3
The platelet hyporesponsiveness to clopidogrel in acute coronary syndrome patients treated with 75 mg/day clopidogrel may be overcome within 1 month of treatment.接受每日 75 毫克氯吡格雷治疗的急性冠脉综合征患者,其血小板对氯吡格雷反应低下,在治疗 1 个月内可能会得到克服。
Platelets. 2012;23(2):121-31. doi: 10.3109/09537104.2011.597527. Epub 2011 Aug 2.
4
Prasugrel compared with high-dose clopidogrel in acute coronary syndrome. The randomised, double-blind ACAPULCO study.普拉格雷与大剂量氯吡格雷治疗急性冠脉综合征的比较。随机、双盲的 ACAPULCO 研究。
Thromb Haemost. 2010 Jan;103(1):213-23. doi: 10.1160/TH09-07-0482. Epub 2009 Oct 26.
5
Comparison of platelet reactivity and clopidogrel response in patients ≤ 75 Years Versus > 75 years undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome.≤75 岁与>75 岁行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗非 ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者的血小板反应性和氯吡格雷反应比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2011 Nov 15;108(10):1411-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.06.060. Epub 2011 Aug 25.
6
Benefit of a 600-mg loading dose of clopidogrel on platelet reactivity and clinical outcomes in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome undergoing coronary stenting.氯吡格雷600毫克负荷剂量对接受冠状动脉支架置入术的非ST段抬高急性冠状动脉综合征患者血小板反应性及临床结局的益处。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Oct 3;48(7):1339-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.06.049. Epub 2006 Sep 12.
7
Randomized trial comparing 600- with 300-mg loading dose of clopidogrel in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: results of the Platelet Responsiveness to Aspirin and Clopidogrel and Troponin Increment after Coronary intervention in Acute coronary Lesions (PRACTICAL) Trial.在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者中比较氯吡格雷600毫克与300毫克负荷剂量的随机试验:急性冠状动脉病变冠状动脉介入术后阿司匹林和氯吡格雷的血小板反应性及肌钙蛋白增量(PRACTICAL)试验结果
Am Heart J. 2009 Jan;157(1):60.e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.09.024.
8
Platelet inhibition by abciximab bolus-only administration and oral ADP receptor antagonist loading in acute coronary syndrome patients: the blocking and bridging strategy.急性冠状动脉综合征患者仅用阿昔单抗推注进行血小板抑制和口服 ADP 受体拮抗剂负荷治疗:阻断和桥接策略。
Thromb Res. 2013 Jul;132(1):e36-41. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2013.05.029. Epub 2013 Jun 19.
9
Functional impact of high clopidogrel maintenance dosing in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary interventions. Results of a randomized study.高剂量氯吡格雷维持治疗对择期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的功能影响:一项随机研究的结果
Thromb Haemost. 2008 Jan;99(1):161-8. doi: 10.1160/TH07-09-0562.
10
The relationship between on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity, genotype, and post-percutaneous coronary intervention outcomes in Chinese patients.中国患者中氯吡格雷治疗时的血小板反应性、基因型与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗术后结局的关系。
Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2015 May;75(3):223-9. doi: 10.3109/00365513.2014.993696. Epub 2015 Jan 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of the effect of ticagrelor combined with tirofiban versus clopidogrel combined with tirofiban on inflammation response and prognosis of patients with unstable angina pectoris in long term follow-up.比较替格瑞洛联合替罗非班与氯吡格雷联合替罗非班对不稳定型心绞痛患者长期随访中炎症反应和预后的影响。
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2021 Nov;37(11):1010-1015. doi: 10.1002/kjm2.12421. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
2
Clinical outcomes and predictive model of platelet reactivity to clopidogrel after acute ischemic vascular events.急性缺血性血管事件后氯吡格雷反应性血小板的临床转归及预测模型。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2019 May 5;132(9):1053-1062. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000000210.