Slagle Jason M, Anders Shilo, Porterfield Eric, Arnold Alexandra, Calderwood Charles, Weinger Matthew B
From the *Center for Research and Innovation in Systems Safety (CRISS), †Departments of Anesthesiology, and ‡Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine; and §Geriatric Education, Research, and Clinic Care Center (GRECC), VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, Tennessee.
J Patient Saf. 2015 Dec;11(4):198-203. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000081.
A nonroutine event (NRE) is defined as any event that deviates from ideal clinical care for a given patient in a specific clinical situation. We sought to compare anesthesia providers' reporting of NREs with the incidence of significant physiological disturbances (SPDs) detected via retrospective videotape review. SPD criteria were defined prestudy to be deviations of physiological parameters (heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and oxygen saturation) requiring clinical intervention. We hypothesized that SPDs would occur more frequently in NRE cases than in routine (no reported NRE) cases.
A trained observer reviewed videotapes of anesthesia care from 16 randomly selected NRE-containing and 16 matched routine cases for SPD occurrence using custom software. Data were analyzed using nonparametric tests.
Although a preponderance of the anesthetic in both types of cases were uneventful (i.e., free of SPD in 97 ± 1.6% of routine case time versus 89 ± 3.9% of NRE case time), there was at least one SPD episode in 69% of routine and 88% of NRE cases. NRE-containing cases had significantly more SPDs than routine cases (1.4 ± 0.9 SPDs/case hour for NRE versus 0.8 ± 0.3 for routine cases). Twice as many SPDs during NRE-containing cases were clinically related to a reported NRE as opposed to unrelated.
SPDs occur more often in NRE-containing cases. The incidence of approximately one NRE-independent SPD per case was similar in NRE-containing and routine case. Further research is needed to ascertain the relationship of both NREs and SPDs to patient outcomes.
非常规事件(NRE)被定义为在特定临床情况下偏离给定患者理想临床护理的任何事件。我们试图比较麻醉提供者对NRE的报告与通过回顾性录像审查检测到的重大生理紊乱(SPD)的发生率。SPD标准在研究前被定义为需要临床干预的生理参数(心率、收缩压和血氧饱和度)的偏差。我们假设SPD在NRE病例中比在常规(未报告NRE)病例中更频繁发生。
一名经过培训的观察者使用定制软件回顾了16例随机选择的包含NRE的麻醉护理录像和16例匹配的常规病例录像,以确定SPD的发生情况。使用非参数检验分析数据。
虽然两种类型病例中的大多数麻醉过程都很顺利(即,常规病例时间的97±1.6%无SPD,而NRE病例时间的89±3.9%无SPD),但69%的常规病例和88%的NRE病例至少有一次SPD发作。包含NRE的病例比常规病例有明显更多的SPD(NRE为1.4±0.9次SPD/病例小时,常规病例为0.8±0.3次)。在包含NRE的病例中,与报告的NRE临床相关的SPD是无关SPD的两倍。
SPD在包含NRE的病例中更常发生。在包含NRE的病例和常规病例中,每例约有一次与NRE无关的SPD的发生率相似。需要进一步研究以确定NRE和SPD与患者预后的关系。