School of Science and Technology, University of New England, Armidale, Australia.
School of Science and Technology, University of New England, Armidale, Australia.
JACC Heart Fail. 2013 Dec;1(6):514-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2013.08.006. Epub 2013 Oct 23.
The aim of this study was to establish whether aerobic exercise training intensity produces different effect sizes for fitness, adherence, event rates, mortality rates, and hospitalization rates in patients with heart failure.
Intuitively, greater exercise intensity is considered to result in higher risk for serious events, but intensity may be the primary stimulus for physical adaptation.
A MEDLINE search (1985 to 2012) was conducted for exercise-based rehabilitation trials in heart failure, using the search terms "exercise training," "left ventricular dysfunction," "peak Vo2," "cardio-myopathy," and "systolic heart dysfunction." Seventy-four studies were included, producing 76 intervention groups; 9 (11.8%) were high-intensity, 38 (50%) vigorous-intensity, 24 (31.6%) moderate-intensity, and 5 (6.6%) low-intensity groups, providing a total of 3,265 exercising subjects and 2,612 control subjects.
Peak oxygen consumption increased by a mean difference of 3.33 ml·kg(-1)·min(-1) (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.53 to 6.13 ml·kg(-1)·min(-1); p = 0.02) with high-intensity training in exercise groups compared with control groups, equating to a 23% improvement from baseline. For vigorous intensity, the mean difference was 2.27 ml·kg(-1)·min(-1) (95% CI: 1.70 to 2.84 ml·kg(-1)·min(-1); p < 0.00001), with an 8% weighted mean; for moderate intensity, the mean difference was 2.17 ml·kg(-1)·min(-1) (95% CI: 1.34 to 2.99 ml·kg(-1)·min(-1); p < 0.00001), with a weighted mean of 13%; and for low intensity, the mean difference was 1.04 ml·kg(-1)·min(-1) (95% CI: -2.50 to 4.57 ml·kg(-1)·min(-1); p = 0.57), with a weighted mean of 7%. In 123,479 patient-hours of training, not a single death was directly attributable to exercise.
As exercise training intensity rises, so may the magnitude of improvement in cardiorespiratory fitness, accompanied by lower study withdrawal in exercising patients. Total exercise time may be a confounder.
本研究旨在确定有氧运动训练强度对心力衰竭患者的健康状况、依从性、事件发生率、死亡率和住院率是否有不同的影响。
直觉上,更大的运动强度被认为会导致更严重的事件风险,但强度可能是身体适应的主要刺激。
对心力衰竭的基于运动的康复试验进行了 MEDLINE 搜索(1985 年至 2012 年),使用的搜索词是“运动训练”、“左心室功能障碍”、“峰值 Vo2”、“心肌病”和“收缩性心力衰竭”。共纳入 74 项研究,产生了 76 个干预组;9 个(11.8%)为高强度组,38 个(50%)为剧烈强度组,24 个(31.6%)为中等强度组,5 个(6.6%)为低强度组,共 3265 名运动受试者和 2612 名对照组。
与对照组相比,高强度训练组的峰值耗氧量平均增加 3.33 ml·kg(-1)·min(-1)(95%置信区间[CI]:0.53 至 6.13 ml·kg(-1)·min(-1);p=0.02),相当于基线水平提高了 23%。对于剧烈强度,平均差异为 2.27 ml·kg(-1)·min(-1)(95% CI:1.70 至 2.84 ml·kg(-1)·min(-1);p<0.00001),加权平均值为 8%;对于中等强度,平均差异为 2.17 ml·kg(-1)·min(-1)(95% CI:1.34 至 2.99 ml·kg(-1)·min(-1);p<0.00001),加权平均值为 13%;对于低强度,平均差异为 1.04 ml·kg(-1)·min(-1)(95% CI:-2.50 至 4.57 ml·kg(-1)·min(-1);p=0.57),加权平均值为 7%。在 123479 小时的训练中,没有一例死亡直接归因于运动。
随着运动训练强度的增加,心肺健康的改善幅度可能会增加,同时运动患者的研究退出率也会降低。总运动时间可能是一个混杂因素。