Okawa T, Kita M, Goto M, Nishijima H, Miyaji N
Department of Radiology, Tokyo Women's Medical College, Japan.
Radiother Oncol. 1988 Oct;13(2):99-104. doi: 10.1016/0167-8140(88)90031-x.
A prospective randomized clinical trial comparing small, large and twice-a-day fraction for the relief of painful bone metastases was performed from 1981 to 1986 at Tokyo Women's Medical College Hospital. Eighty patients with painful bone metastases (92 sites) were divided into three radiation methods which were conventional fraction scheme of 5 times/week at 2 Gy/day for a total of 30 Gy/15 fractions (Group I, TDF: 49), 2 times/week at 4.5 Gy/day for a total of 22.5 Gy/5 fractions (Group II, TDF: 50) and 3 times/week at 2 Gy/day twice a day at a minimum interval of 6 h for a total of 20 Gy/10 fractions (Group III). Pain was assessed using a score and response rate was 76% in Group I, 75% in Group II and 78% in Group III which were not statistically significant mutually. Group II and III regimes were found to have an earlier shorter onset of pain relief than Group I, but the dose of onset of pain relief was almost the same. Our data suggested that individualization of radiotherapy schedules based on to assess the patient's condition and the expected quality of life and to consider radiation site and size of field, was more important than the fractionation regime in the treatment of painful bone metastases.
1981年至1986年,东京女子医科大学医院开展了一项前瞻性随机临床试验,比较小剂量、大剂量及每日两次分割照射缓解骨转移疼痛的效果。80例骨转移疼痛患者(共92处转移部位)被分为三种放疗方式:I组采用常规分割方案,每周5次,每次2 Gy,共30 Gy/15次分割(TDF:49);II组每周2次,每次4.5 Gy,共22.5 Gy/5次分割(TDF:50);III组每周3次,每次2 Gy,每日2次,间隔至少6小时,共20 Gy/10次分割。采用评分法评估疼痛情况,I组缓解率为76%,II组为75%,III组为78%,三组之间差异无统计学意义。结果发现,II组和III组疼痛缓解起效时间比I组更早、更短,但疼痛缓解剂量基本相同。我们的数据表明,在治疗骨转移疼痛时,根据患者情况、预期生活质量评估以及考虑放疗部位和照射野大小来制定个体化放疗方案,比分割方式更为重要。