Suppr超能文献

国家毒品管制法律能否确保阿片类药物用于医疗和科研目的?

Do national drug control laws ensure the availability of opioids for medical and scientific purposes?

作者信息

Husain S Asra, Brown Marty Skemp, Maurer Martha A

机构信息

WHO Collaborating Center for Pain Policy and Palliative Care, Pain and Policy Studies Group, University of Wisconsin, 1300 University Avenue, 6152 MSC, Madison, WI 53706, United States of America .

出版信息

Bull World Health Organ. 2014 Feb 1;92(2):108-16. doi: 10.2471/BLT.13.121558. Epub 2013 Nov 26.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether national drug control laws ensure that opioid drugs are available for medical and scientific purposes, as intended by the 1972 Protocol amendment to the 1961 Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs.

METHODS

The authors examined whether the text of a convenience sample of drug laws from 15 countries: (i) acknowledged that opioid drugs are indispensable for the relief of pain and suffering; (ii) recognized that government was responsible for ensuring the adequate provision of such drugs for medical and scientific purposes; (iii) designated an administrative body for implementing international drug control conventions; and (iv) acknowledged a government's intention to implement international conventions, including the Single Convention.

FINDINGS

Most national laws were found not to contain measures that ensured adequate provision of opioid drugs for medical and scientific purposes. Moreover, the model legislation provided by the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime did not establish an obligation on national governments to ensure the availability of these drugs for medical use.

CONCLUSION

To achieve consistency with the Single Convention, as well as with associated resolutions and recommendations of international bodies, national drug control laws and model policies should be updated to include measures that ensure drug availability to balance the restrictions imposed by the existing drug control measures needed to prevent the diversion and nonmedical use of such drugs.

摘要

目的

确定国家药物管制法律是否确保阿片类药物可用于医疗和科学目的,这是1972年对《1961年麻醉品单一公约》的议定书修正案所期望的。

方法

作者研究了来自15个国家的药物法律便利样本的文本是否:(i)承认阿片类药物对于缓解疼痛和痛苦必不可少;(ii)认识到政府有责任确保为医疗和科学目的充分提供此类药物;(iii)指定一个行政机构来执行国际药物管制公约;以及(iv)承认政府实施国际公约(包括《单一公约》)的意图。

研究结果

发现大多数国家法律未包含确保为医疗和科学目的充分提供阿片类药物的措施。此外,联合国毒品和犯罪问题办公室提供的示范立法并未规定各国政府有义务确保这些药物可用于医疗用途。

结论

为了与《单一公约》以及国际机构的相关决议和建议保持一致,国家药物管制法律和示范政策应予以更新,以纳入确保药物供应的措施,以平衡为防止此类药物的转移和非医疗用途而实施的现有药物管制措施所带来的限制。

相似文献

6
Legal bases for the control of analgesic drugs.镇痛药管制的法律依据。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 1994 Apr;9(3):153-9. doi: 10.1016/0885-3924(94)90124-4.

本文引用的文献

4
Global cancer statistics.全球癌症统计数据。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2011 Mar-Apr;61(2):69-90. doi: 10.3322/caac.20107. Epub 2011 Feb 4.
7
Prescribing policies of opioids for chronic pain.
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2007;21(2):53-5.
8
Mongolia: establishing a national palliative care program.蒙古:建立国家姑息治疗项目。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2007 May;33(5):568-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.02.017.
9
Integrating palliative care into national policies.将姑息治疗纳入国家政策。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2007 May;33(5):514-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.02.031.
10

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验