• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Do national drug control laws ensure the availability of opioids for medical and scientific purposes?国家毒品管制法律能否确保阿片类药物用于医疗和科研目的?
Bull World Health Organ. 2014 Feb 1;92(2):108-16. doi: 10.2471/BLT.13.121558. Epub 2013 Nov 26.
2
Do international model drug control laws provide for drug availability?国际示范毒品管制法是否规定了毒品的可获得性?
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2009;23(2):145-52. doi: 10.1080/15360280902900729.
3
The Contribution of the International Pain Policy Fellowship in Improving Opioid Availability in Georgia.国际疼痛政策研究员项目对改善格鲁吉亚类阿片可及性的贡献。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 Nov;54(5):749-757. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.07.044. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
4
Medicines and the drug control treaties: is buprenorphine for opioid addiction at risk of being lost?药品与药物管制条约:用于阿片类药物成瘾的丁丙诺啡会面临流失风险吗?
Hum Psychopharmacol. 2004 Jun;19(4):215-24. doi: 10.1002/hup.588.
5
Pain and Policy Studies Group: Two Decades of Working to Address Regulatory Barriers to Improve Opioid Availability and Accessibility Around the World.疼痛与政策研究组:二十年来致力于消除监管障碍,改善全球范围内阿片类药物的可及性。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Feb;55(2S):S121-S134. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.03.029. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
6
Legal bases for the control of analgesic drugs.镇痛药管制的法律依据。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 1994 Apr;9(3):153-9. doi: 10.1016/0885-3924(94)90124-4.
7
Ensuring and Restoring Balance on Access to Controlled Substances for Medical and Scientific Purposes: Joint Statement from Palliative Care Organizations.确保和恢复医疗及科研目的管制药品获取的平衡:姑息治疗组织联合声明
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2018 Jun-Sep;32(2-3):124-128. doi: 10.1080/15360288.2018.1488792. Epub 2018 Sep 10.
8
Formulary availability and regulatory barriers to accessibility of opioids for cancer pain in Europe: a report from the ESMO/EAPC Opioid Policy Initiative.在欧洲,癌症疼痛阿片类药物的处方供应和可及性的监管障碍:来自 ESMO/EAPC 阿片类药物政策倡议的报告。
Ann Oncol. 2010 Mar;21(3):615-626. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdp581.
9
Improving the availability and accessibility of opioids for the treatment of pain: the International Pain Policy Fellowship.改善阿片类药物治疗疼痛的可及性:国际疼痛政策研究员。
Support Care Cancer. 2011 Aug;19(8):1239-47. doi: 10.1007/s00520-011-1200-2. Epub 2011 Jun 3.
10
Perceptions and experiences of laws and regulations governing access to opioids in South, Southeast, East and Central Asia: A systematic review, critical interpretative synthesis and development of a conceptual framework.南亚、东南亚、东亚和中亚地区阿片类药物获取相关法律法规的认知与经验:一项系统综述、批判性解释性综合分析及概念框架的构建
Palliat Med. 2021 Jan;35(1):59-75. doi: 10.1177/0269216320966505. Epub 2020 Oct 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Perceptions and experiences of laws and regulations governing access to opioids in South, Southeast, East and Central Asia: A systematic review, critical interpretative synthesis and development of a conceptual framework.南亚、东南亚、东亚和中亚地区阿片类药物获取相关法律法规的认知与经验:一项系统综述、批判性解释性综合分析及概念框架的构建
Palliat Med. 2021 Jan;35(1):59-75. doi: 10.1177/0269216320966505. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
2
Challenges on the provision of palliative care for patients with cancer in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of reviews.中低收入国家癌症患者姑息治疗提供面临的挑战:系统评价综述。
BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Apr 22;19(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00558-5.
3
Consumption trends and prescription patterns of opioids from 2011 to 2016: a survey in a Chinese city.2011 年至 2016 年阿片类药物的消费趋势和处方模式:中国一城市的调查。
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 1;9(3):e021923. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021923.
4
Palliative care in universal health coverage: What about humanitarian emergency assistance?
Int J Public Health. 2019 May;64(4):475-476. doi: 10.1007/s00038-018-1184-5. Epub 2018 Nov 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Adequacy of opioid analgesic consumption at country, global, and regional levels in 2010, its relationship with development level, and changes compared with 2006.2010年各国、全球及区域层面阿片类镇痛药的消费充足情况、其与发展水平的关系以及与2006年相比的变化。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 Feb;47(2):283-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.03.015. Epub 2013 Jul 17.
2
Improving the availability and accessibility of opioids for the treatment of pain: the International Pain Policy Fellowship.改善阿片类药物治疗疼痛的可及性:国际疼痛政策研究员。
Support Care Cancer. 2011 Aug;19(8):1239-47. doi: 10.1007/s00520-011-1200-2. Epub 2011 Jun 3.
3
A first comparison between the consumption of and the need for opioid analgesics at country, regional, and global levels.在国家、区域和全球层面上对阿片类镇痛药的消费与需求进行的首次比较。
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2011;25(1):6-18. doi: 10.3109/15360288.2010.536307.
4
Global cancer statistics.全球癌症统计数据。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2011 Mar-Apr;61(2):69-90. doi: 10.3322/caac.20107. Epub 2011 Feb 4.
5
Formulary availability and regulatory barriers to accessibility of opioids for cancer pain in Europe: a report from the ESMO/EAPC Opioid Policy Initiative.在欧洲,癌症疼痛阿片类药物的处方供应和可及性的监管障碍:来自 ESMO/EAPC 阿片类药物政策倡议的报告。
Ann Oncol. 2010 Mar;21(3):615-626. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdp581.
6
Do international model drug control laws provide for drug availability?国际示范毒品管制法是否规定了毒品的可获得性?
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2009;23(2):145-52. doi: 10.1080/15360280902900729.
7
Prescribing policies of opioids for chronic pain.
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2007;21(2):53-5.
8
Mongolia: establishing a national palliative care program.蒙古:建立国家姑息治疗项目。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2007 May;33(5):568-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.02.017.
9
Integrating palliative care into national policies.将姑息治疗纳入国家政策。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2007 May;33(5):514-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.02.031.
10
Reform of drug control policy for palliative care in Romania.罗马尼亚姑息治疗药物管制政策改革。
Lancet. 2006 Jun 24;367(9528):2110-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68482-1.

国家毒品管制法律能否确保阿片类药物用于医疗和科研目的?

Do national drug control laws ensure the availability of opioids for medical and scientific purposes?

作者信息

Husain S Asra, Brown Marty Skemp, Maurer Martha A

机构信息

WHO Collaborating Center for Pain Policy and Palliative Care, Pain and Policy Studies Group, University of Wisconsin, 1300 University Avenue, 6152 MSC, Madison, WI 53706, United States of America .

出版信息

Bull World Health Organ. 2014 Feb 1;92(2):108-16. doi: 10.2471/BLT.13.121558. Epub 2013 Nov 26.

DOI:10.2471/BLT.13.121558
PMID:24623904
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3949532/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether national drug control laws ensure that opioid drugs are available for medical and scientific purposes, as intended by the 1972 Protocol amendment to the 1961 Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs.

METHODS

The authors examined whether the text of a convenience sample of drug laws from 15 countries: (i) acknowledged that opioid drugs are indispensable for the relief of pain and suffering; (ii) recognized that government was responsible for ensuring the adequate provision of such drugs for medical and scientific purposes; (iii) designated an administrative body for implementing international drug control conventions; and (iv) acknowledged a government's intention to implement international conventions, including the Single Convention.

FINDINGS

Most national laws were found not to contain measures that ensured adequate provision of opioid drugs for medical and scientific purposes. Moreover, the model legislation provided by the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime did not establish an obligation on national governments to ensure the availability of these drugs for medical use.

CONCLUSION

To achieve consistency with the Single Convention, as well as with associated resolutions and recommendations of international bodies, national drug control laws and model policies should be updated to include measures that ensure drug availability to balance the restrictions imposed by the existing drug control measures needed to prevent the diversion and nonmedical use of such drugs.

摘要

目的

确定国家药物管制法律是否确保阿片类药物可用于医疗和科学目的,这是1972年对《1961年麻醉品单一公约》的议定书修正案所期望的。

方法

作者研究了来自15个国家的药物法律便利样本的文本是否:(i)承认阿片类药物对于缓解疼痛和痛苦必不可少;(ii)认识到政府有责任确保为医疗和科学目的充分提供此类药物;(iii)指定一个行政机构来执行国际药物管制公约;以及(iv)承认政府实施国际公约(包括《单一公约》)的意图。

研究结果

发现大多数国家法律未包含确保为医疗和科学目的充分提供阿片类药物的措施。此外,联合国毒品和犯罪问题办公室提供的示范立法并未规定各国政府有义务确保这些药物可用于医疗用途。

结论

为了与《单一公约》以及国际机构的相关决议和建议保持一致,国家药物管制法律和示范政策应予以更新,以纳入确保药物供应的措施,以平衡为防止此类药物的转移和非医疗用途而实施的现有药物管制措施所带来的限制。