Ramoska E A, Sacchetti A D, Nepp M
Emergency Services, Our Lady of Lourdes Medical Center, Camden, New Jersey.
Ann Emerg Med. 1989 Jan;18(1):48-50. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(89)80310-5.
In an effort to assess the reliability of patient history in excluding pregnancy, we studied the correlation between specific historical factors and the presence of a positive qualitative serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin assay. Two hundred eight patients were studied, and information was collected prospectively on a variety of historical criteria. Three historical variables were statistically less likely to be associated with pregnancy: last menstrual period that was on time, the patient thinking she was not pregnant, and the patient stating there was no chance she could be pregnant (P less than .001). There was, however, still at least a 10% chance of the patient being pregnant. Combinations of historical criteria were likewise unsuccessful at totally excluding pregnancy. These data support the contention that patient history is an unreliable method of excluding pregnancy in emergency department patients and supports the liberal use of pregnancy tests.
为了评估患者病史在排除妊娠方面的可靠性,我们研究了特定历史因素与血清β-人绒毛膜促性腺激素定性检测呈阳性之间的相关性。我们对208名患者进行了研究,并前瞻性地收集了各种历史标准的信息。三个历史变量在统计学上与妊娠相关的可能性较小:月经周期正常、患者认为自己未怀孕以及患者表示自己不可能怀孕(P <.001)。然而,患者仍至少有10%的怀孕几率。历史标准的组合同样无法完全排除妊娠。这些数据支持了这样的观点,即患者病史是急诊科患者排除妊娠的不可靠方法,并支持广泛使用妊娠试验。