• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Laboratory animals need only humane treatment: animal "rights" may debase human rights.

作者信息

Lansdell H

机构信息

Yerkes Regional Primate Research Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322.

出版信息

Int J Neurosci. 1988 Oct;42(3-4):169-78. doi: 10.3109/00207458808991594.

DOI:10.3109/00207458808991594
PMID:2463233
Abstract

Arguments for animal "rights" confuse the issue of what rights are about and, in the context of the care of laboratory animals, are misleading. Only human beings have rights and they should be cherished and extended. Consideration of the welfare of animals is important, but the context is that it is for the benefit of human beings and the animals serving humanity. Scientists need to explain the worth of animal research, particularly in regard to psychological studies. They also need to expose the fallacies in the animal rightists' arguments as one of the means to help diminish the threat to science.

摘要

相似文献

1
Laboratory animals need only humane treatment: animal "rights" may debase human rights.
Int J Neurosci. 1988 Oct;42(3-4):169-78. doi: 10.3109/00207458808991594.
2
Laboratory animals need only humane treatment: animal "rights" may debase human rights.实验动物仅需要人道的对待:动物“权利”可能会贬低人权。
Int J Neurosci. 1988;42:169-78.
3
Human vs animal rights. In defense of animal research.人类与动物权利。为动物研究辩护。
JAMA. 1989 Nov 17;262(19):2716-20.
4
Animals and alternatives: societal expectations and scientific need.动物与替代方法:社会期望与科学需求。
Altern Lab Anim. 2004 Dec;32(6):545-51. doi: 10.1177/026119290403200605.
5
The rights of man and animal experimentation.人类权利与动物实验
J Med Ethics. 1990 Sep;16(3):160-1. doi: 10.1136/jme.16.3.160.
6
Morally relevant differences between animals and human beings justifying the use of animals in biomedical research.动物与人类之间在道德层面上的相关差异,证明了在生物医学研究中使用动物的合理性。
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1997 Mar 1;210(5):612-8.
7
Perverting medical history in the service of "animal rights".歪曲病史以服务于“动物权利”。
Perspect Biol Med. 2002 Fall;45(4):606-19. doi: 10.1353/pbm.2002.0074.
8
Animal rights and human rights. It's time to pull the frog out of the pot.动物权利与人类权利。是时候把青蛙从锅里捞出来了。 (此译文可能因原文含义不太明确,在理解上存在一定模糊性,你可根据实际背景进一步确定准确意思。)
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1990 Sep;116(9):1017-8. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1990.01870090033001.
9
Animal welfare and animal rights.动物福利与动物权利。
J Med Philos. 1988 May;13(2):159-75. doi: 10.1093/jmp/13.2.159.
10
Animal welfare and colony management in cancer research.癌症研究中的动物福利与群体管理
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1997 Nov-Dec;46(2-3):313-31. doi: 10.1023/a:1005978026638.