Suppr超能文献

眼库中内皮角膜评估的Flex中心法与中心法:一项对比分析

Flex center method versus center method for endothelial corneal evaluation in eye banking: a comparative analysis.

作者信息

Villalba R, Jiménez A, Fornés G, Eisman M, Villagrán J L Gómez

机构信息

Regional Blood Transfusion Center and Tissue Establishment (Andalusian Biobank), Avda. San Alberto Magno s/n, 14004, Córdoba, Spain,

出版信息

Cell Tissue Bank. 2014 Dec;15(4):507-12. doi: 10.1007/s10561-014-9434-0. Epub 2014 Mar 15.

Abstract

Specular microscopy can provide a non-invasive morphological analysis of the cornea endothelial cell layer. A variety of analysis programs are available to determine corneal endothelial quality. The flex-center endothelial analysis method (Konan Inc) is a newer technique including the outermost digitized cells and thus increases the number of cells for analysis. The aim of this study is to analyze whether the new flex-center method, increases the possibilities of corneal endothelium evaluation before implants. For this purpose 67 corneas were studied by both methods at the Eye Bank of the Tissue Establishment of Córdoba. Although we have found differences in the resulting of number of cells in the area analysed, no significant differences were found with respect to the endothelial cell count, coefficient of variation cell area, and the percentage of hexagonal cells recorded. Based on this data, both methods can be used satisfactorily in eye banking.

摘要

镜面显微镜检查可对角膜内皮细胞层进行非侵入性形态学分析。有多种分析程序可用于确定角膜内皮质量。Flex-center内皮分析方法(科南公司)是一种较新的技术,它包括最外层的数字化细胞,从而增加了用于分析的细胞数量。本研究的目的是分析这种新的Flex-center方法是否增加了植入前角膜内皮评估的可能性。为此,在科尔多瓦组织库眼库对67只角膜采用两种方法进行了研究。尽管我们发现在分析区域的细胞数量结果上存在差异,但在记录的内皮细胞计数、细胞面积变异系数和六边形细胞百分比方面未发现显著差异。基于这些数据,两种方法在眼库中均可令人满意地使用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验