• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

10429 例局限性喉癌患者的治疗和生存情况:基于人群的分析。

Treatment and survival in 10,429 patients with localized laryngeal cancer: a population-based analysis.

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

出版信息

Cancer. 2014 Jun 15;120(12):1810-7. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28608. Epub 2014 Mar 17.

DOI:10.1002/cncr.28608
PMID:24639148
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5560918/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The objectives of this study were to identify factors associated with treatment differences, characterize changes in treatment patterns over time, and compare survival across treatment types in patients who received treatment for localized laryngeal cancer.

METHODS

Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, we conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of patients who were treated from 1995 to 2009 for localized laryngeal cancer. Four treatment groups were defined: (1) radiation only, (2) local surgery only, (3) local surgery and radiation, and (4) open surgery with or without radiation. Variations in treatment rates between these groups were evaluated according to demographic factors, and differences in treatment rates across time were calculated. Associations between treatment and mortality were assessed using Kaplan-Meier methods. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to adjust for potential confounding covariates.

RESULTS

In total, 10,429 patients with localized laryngeal cancer were identified. Most patients (57%) were treated with radiation only; 25% with local surgery and radiation, 9% with local surgery only, and 9% with open surgery with or without radiation. Race, age, and registry were associated with differences in treatment. Receipt of single-modality treatment increased and receipt of combined-modality treatment decreased over the study period. Better survival was observed with white race, younger age, and treatment with local surgery. Survival differences associated with treatment type were observed within 3 years of diagnosis and persisted beyond 5 years after diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Although treatment patterns became more adherent to treatment guidelines over time, we identified survival differences associated with treatment type that warrant further investigation into treatment decision-making for patients with localized laryngeal cancer.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在确定与治疗差异相关的因素,描述随时间推移治疗模式的变化,并比较接受局部喉癌治疗的患者在不同治疗类型之间的生存情况。

方法

我们使用监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库,对 1995 年至 2009 年期间接受局部喉癌治疗的患者进行了回顾性队列分析。定义了四个治疗组:(1)仅放疗,(2)仅局部手术,(3)局部手术加放疗,(4)开放手术加或不加放疗。根据人口统计学因素评估这些组之间的治疗率变化,并计算随时间推移的治疗率差异。使用 Kaplan-Meier 方法评估治疗与死亡率之间的关联。使用 Cox 比例风险回归模型调整潜在混杂协变量。

结果

共确定了 10429 例局部喉癌患者。大多数患者(57%)接受了单纯放疗;25%接受了局部手术加放疗,9%接受了单纯局部手术,9%接受了开放手术加或不加放疗。种族、年龄和登记处与治疗差异有关。单模式治疗的接受率增加,联合模式治疗的接受率降低。白种人、年轻、接受局部手术治疗的患者生存率更好。在诊断后 3 年内观察到与治疗类型相关的生存差异,并在诊断后 5 年以上持续存在。

结论

尽管治疗模式随时间的推移变得更加符合治疗指南,但我们发现与治疗类型相关的生存差异值得进一步研究,以了解局部喉癌患者的治疗决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3d5/5560918/6b4e2edc523b/nihms887294f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3d5/5560918/bf65352e85fc/nihms887294f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3d5/5560918/0ae1583f90c4/nihms887294f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3d5/5560918/6b4e2edc523b/nihms887294f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3d5/5560918/bf65352e85fc/nihms887294f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3d5/5560918/0ae1583f90c4/nihms887294f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3d5/5560918/6b4e2edc523b/nihms887294f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Treatment and survival in 10,429 patients with localized laryngeal cancer: a population-based analysis.10429 例局限性喉癌患者的治疗和生存情况:基于人群的分析。
Cancer. 2014 Jun 15;120(12):1810-7. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28608. Epub 2014 Mar 17.
2
Temporal trends in the treatment of early- and advanced-stage laryngeal cancer in the United States, 1985-2007.1985 - 2007年美国早期和晚期喉癌治疗的时间趋势
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011 Oct;137(10):1017-24. doi: 10.1001/archoto.2011.171.
3
Racial disparities in laryngeal cancer treatment and outcome: A population-based analysis of 24,069 patients.喉癌治疗与预后的种族差异:基于人群的24069例患者分析
Laryngoscope. 2015 Jul;125(7):1667-74. doi: 10.1002/lary.25212. Epub 2015 Feb 18.
4
Short- and long-term outcomes of laryngeal cancer care in the elderly.老年喉癌患者治疗的短期和长期结果
Laryngoscope. 2015 Apr;125(4):924-33. doi: 10.1002/lary.25012. Epub 2014 Nov 4.
5
Geographic trends in management of early-stage laryngeal cancer.早期喉癌治疗的地理趋势。
Laryngoscope. 2016 Apr;126(4):880-4. doi: 10.1002/lary.25768. Epub 2015 Nov 3.
6
Five-year survival rates and time trends of laryngeal cancer in the US population.美国人群喉癌的五年生存率及时间趋势。
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008 Apr;134(4):370-9. doi: 10.1001/archotol.134.4.370.
7
Survival outcomes in advanced laryngeal cancer.晚期喉癌的生存结果。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 Sep;140(9):855-60. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2014.1671.
8
Epidemiology and prognostic indicators in laryngeal lymphoma: A population-based analysis.喉淋巴瘤的流行病学及预后指标:一项基于人群的分析。
Laryngoscope. 2018 Sep;128(9):2044-2049. doi: 10.1002/lary.27074. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
9
Impact of radiotherapy on laryngeal cancer survival: a population-based study of 13,808 US patients.放疗对喉癌生存的影响:基于人群的 13808 例美国患者研究。
Cancer. 2012 Mar 1;118(5):1276-87. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26357. Epub 2011 Jul 19.
10
Primary surgery for advanced-stage laryngeal cancer: A stage and subsite-specific survival analysis.晚期喉癌的初次手术:一项基于分期和亚部位的生存分析。
Head Neck. 2016 Sep;38(9):1380-6. doi: 10.1002/hed.24443. Epub 2016 Mar 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Managing Laryngeal Carcinoma in the United Arab Emirates: An Experience From the Tertiary Care Center.阿拉伯联合酋长国喉癌的管理:来自三级护理中心的经验
Cureus. 2025 Aug 7;17(8):e89563. doi: 10.7759/cureus.89563. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Treatment Outcomes Differ for Racial and Ethnic Minorities with Advanced-Stage Laryngeal Cancer: A Florida Cancer Data System Analysis.晚期喉癌的种族和少数族裔治疗结果存在差异:佛罗里达癌症数据系统分析
Cancer Res Commun. 2025 Aug 1;5(8):1310-1318. doi: 10.1158/2767-9764.CRC-25-0239.
3
Evaluation of clinical outcomes after partial horizontal laryngectomy.

本文引用的文献

1
Role of endolaryngeal surgery (with or without laser) compared with radiotherapy in the management of early (T1) glottic cancer: a clinical practice guideline.内镜手术(有或无激光)与放疗在治疗早期(T1)声门型喉癌中的作用:临床实践指南。
Curr Oncol. 2013 Apr;20(2):e132-5. doi: 10.3747/co.20.1237.
2
A population-based study of therapy and survival for patients with head and neck cancer treated in the community.基于人群的研究:社区治疗的头颈部癌症患者的治疗和生存情况。
Cancer. 2012 Sep 15;118(18):4452-61. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27419. Epub 2012 Jan 17.
3
Impact of radiotherapy on laryngeal cancer survival: a population-based study of 13,808 US patients.
部分水平喉切除术后临床结果的评估。
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2025 Jul;91 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):101614. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2025.101614. Epub 2025 May 29.
4
The relationship between depth of invasion and cervical lymph node metastasis in patients with laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma.喉鳞状细胞癌患者的浸润深度与颈部淋巴结转移之间的关系。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025 Mar;282(3):1375-1379. doi: 10.1007/s00405-025-09215-0. Epub 2025 Feb 6.
5
Laryngectomy in Young Patients: A Case Series and Review of the Literature.年轻患者的喉切除术:病例系列及文献综述
Cureus. 2023 Dec 7;15(12):e50099. doi: 10.7759/cureus.50099. eCollection 2023 Dec.
6
Prevalence of swallow, communication, voice and cognitive compromise following hospitalisation for COVID-19: the PHOSP-COVID analysis.COVID-19 住院后吞咽、交流、声音和认知功能障碍的流行情况:PHOSP-COVID 分析。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2023 Jul;10(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2023-001647.
7
A Comprehensive Study on Signal Transduction and Therapeutic Role of miR-877 in Human Cancers.miR-877在人类癌症中的信号转导及治疗作用的综合研究
Adv Biomed Res. 2023 May 15;12:118. doi: 10.4103/abr.abr_412_21. eCollection 2023.
8
[Time of care and its impact in the evolution of laryngeal cancer].[护理时间及其在喉癌进展中的影响]
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2022 Aug 31;60(5):495-502.
9
Evaluation of Risk Factors for Laryngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.喉鳞状细胞癌危险因素评估:一项单中心回顾性研究
Front Oncol. 2021 Feb 25;11:606010. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.606010. eCollection 2021.
10
microRNA-139-3p Inhibits Malignant Behaviors of Laryngeal Cancer Cells via the KDM5B/SOX2 Axis and the Wnt/β-Catenin Pathway.微小RNA-139-3p通过KDM5B/SOX2轴和Wnt/β-连环蛋白通路抑制喉癌细胞的恶性行为。
Cancer Manag Res. 2020 Sep 28;12:9197-9209. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S268871. eCollection 2020.
放疗对喉癌生存的影响:基于人群的 13808 例美国患者研究。
Cancer. 2012 Mar 1;118(5):1276-87. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26357. Epub 2011 Jul 19.
4
Underascertainment of radiotherapy receipt in Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry data.监测、流行病学和最终结果注册数据中放疗接收情况的低估。
Cancer. 2012 Jan 15;118(2):333-41. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26295. Epub 2011 Jun 29.
5
What treatment for early-stage glottic carcinoma among adult patients: CO2 endolaryngeal laser excision versus standard fractionated external beam radiation is superior in terms of cost utility?成人早期声门型喉癌的治疗:CO2 喉内激光切除与常规分割外照射放疗相比,在成本效用方面是否更具优势?
Laryngoscope. 2011 Jan;121(1):116-34. doi: 10.1002/lary.21226.
6
Treatment of early-stage glottic cancer: meta-analysis comparison of laser excision versus radiotherapy.早期声门型喉癌的治疗:激光切除与放疗的荟萃分析比较。
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009 Dec;38(6):603-12.
7
Impact of treating facilities' volume on survival for early-stage laryngeal cancer.治疗机构规模对早期喉癌患者生存率的影响。
Head Neck. 2009 Sep;31(9):1137-43. doi: 10.1002/hed.21072.
8
Increasing rates of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among patients with ductal carcinoma in situ.导管原位癌患者中对侧预防性乳房切除术的比例不断上升。
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Mar 20;27(9):1362-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.1681. Epub 2009 Feb 17.
9
Management of early-stage laryngeal cancer.早期喉癌的管理
Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2008 Aug;41(4):757-69, vi-vii. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2008.01.014.
10
Radiotherapeutic management of laryngeal carcinoma.喉癌的放射治疗管理
Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2008 Aug;41(4):715-40, vi. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2008.01.017.