• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

德国版颈部功能障碍指数(NDI)的验证。

Validation of the German version of the Neck Disability Index (NDI).

作者信息

Cramer Holger, Lauche Romy, Langhorst Jost, Dobos Gustav J, Michalsen Andreas

机构信息

Department of Internal and Integrative Medicine, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Faculty of Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Am Deimelsberg 34a, 45276 Essen, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Mar 19;15:91. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-91.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2474-15-91
PMID:24642209
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3999938/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Neck Disability Index (NDI) is the most commonly used outcome measure for neck pain. This study aimed to determine the psychometric properties of a German version of the NDI. Cross-cultural translation and psychometric testing of the NDI were performed.

METHODS

The 10-item NDI was translated into German and administered to 558 patients with chronic unspecific neck pain (Mean age 49.9 ± 11.4 years, 76% female). The factor structure and reliability of the NDI were assessed using factor analysis, Cronbach's alpha, split-half reliability (Spearman-Brown coefficient), and intra-class correlation (ICC2,1). To determine convergent validity, pain intensity (visual analog scale; VAS), pain on movement (VAS), and quality of life (Short Form 36 Health Survey Questionnaire; SF-36) were correlated with the NDI. Correlation with range of motion and sensitivity to change were also assessed in a subsample of 49 patients.

RESULTS

The mean NDI score was 32.75 ± 13.09. Factor analysis revealed a single factor that explained 39.8% of the variance. Cronbach's alpha was 0.81; Spearman-Brown coefficient was 0.80; and intra-class correlation was 0.81 (95% confidence interval = 0.78, 0.83). Significant correlations were found for pain intensity (r = 0.22, p < 0.01), pain on movement (r = 0.39, p < 0.01), quality of life (r = -0.30 to -0.45, p < 0.01), and range of motion (r = -0.34, p = 0.02). Patients who reported global improvement of health after an exercise or yoga intervention showed a higher decrease on the NDI than patients who reported no global improvement (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The German version of the NDI has a comparable factor structure as the original version, acceptable psychometric properties, and is sensitive to change after physical activity. Neck disability is associated with other measures of neck pain.

摘要

背景

颈部功能障碍指数(NDI)是颈部疼痛最常用的疗效指标。本研究旨在确定NDI德文版的心理测量特性。对NDI进行了跨文化翻译和心理测量测试。

方法

将10项的NDI翻译成德文,并应用于558例慢性非特异性颈部疼痛患者(平均年龄49.9±11.4岁,76%为女性)。使用因子分析、克朗巴哈系数、分半信度(斯皮尔曼-布朗系数)和组内相关系数(ICC2,1)评估NDI的因子结构和信度。为确定收敛效度,将疼痛强度(视觉模拟量表;VAS)、运动时疼痛(VAS)和生活质量(简短健康调查36项问卷;SF-36)与NDI进行相关性分析。还在49例患者的子样本中评估了与运动范围和变化敏感性的相关性。

结果

NDI平均得分为32.75±13.09。因子分析显示一个单一因子解释了39.8%的方差。克朗巴哈系数为0.81;斯皮尔曼-布朗系数为0.80;组内相关系数为0.81(95%置信区间=0.78,0.83)。发现疼痛强度(r = 0.22,p < 0.01)、运动时疼痛(r = 0.39,p < 0.01)、生活质量(r = -0.30至-0.45,p < 0.01)和运动范围(r = -0.34,p = 0.02)之间存在显著相关性。报告在运动或瑜伽干预后整体健康状况改善的患者,其NDI下降幅度高于报告无整体改善的患者(p < 0.01)。

结论

NDI德文版具有与原版可比的因子结构、可接受的心理测量特性,并且对体育活动后的变化敏感。颈部功能障碍与其他颈部疼痛指标相关。

相似文献

1
Validation of the German version of the Neck Disability Index (NDI).德国版颈部功能障碍指数(NDI)的验证。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Mar 19;15:91. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-91.
2
Development of the Italian Version of the Neck Disability Index: cross-cultural adaptation, factor analysis, reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change.《颈痛疾患指数量表(意大利语版)的研制:跨文化调适、因子分析、信度、效度及对变化的敏感性》
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Aug 1;37(17):E1038-44. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182579795.
3
Psychometric validation of the authorized Polish version of the Neck Disability Index.《颈痛疾患指数量表波兰语授权版的心理测量学验证》。
Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(25):2132-7. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2013.771706. Epub 2013 Apr 29.
4
Neck Pain and Disability Scale and Neck Disability Index: validity of Dutch language versions.颈部疼痛和残疾量表及颈部残疾指数:荷兰语版本的效度。
Eur Spine J. 2012 Jan;21(1):93-100. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1920-5. Epub 2011 Aug 4.
5
Validity and reliability of a German version of the Neck Disability Index (NDI-G).德文版颈部功能障碍指数(NDI-G)的效度和信度。
Man Ther. 2014 Feb;19(1):52-8. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2013.07.004. Epub 2013 Aug 3.
6
Development, validity and reliability of the Italian version of the Copenhagen neck functional disability scale.哥本哈根颈部功能障碍量表意大利语版的开发、效度与信度
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Nov 23;19(1):409. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2332-z.
7
Validation of Thai versions of the Neck Disability Index and Neck Pain and Disability Scale in patients with neck pain.验证 Thai 版本的 Neck Disability Index 和 Neck Pain and Disability Scale 在患有颈部疼痛的患者中的有效性。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Oct 1;36(21):E1415-21. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31820e68ac.
8
Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Malay version of the Neck Disability Index.马来版颈部残疾指数的跨文化调适与心理计量评估。
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Jan;44(1):124-130. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1758225. Epub 2020 May 6.
9
Psychometric characteristics of the Spanish version of instruments to measure neck pain disability.用于测量颈部疼痛残疾程度的西班牙语版工具的心理测量学特征。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008 Apr 9;9:42. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-9-42.
10
Urdu version of the neck disability index: a reliability and validity study.颈部功能障碍指数的乌尔都语版本:一项信效度研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Apr 8;18(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1469-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Structural and Psychometric Properties of Neck Pain Questionnaires Through Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: A Systematic Review.通过患者报告结局测量评估颈部疼痛问卷的结构和心理测量特性:一项系统评价。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jul 10;61(7):1254. doi: 10.3390/medicina61071254.
2
Results of upper cervical palpation test in migraine patients are not explained by pain sensitization.偏头痛患者上颈椎触诊试验的结果不能用疼痛敏化来解释。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jun 25;15(1):20276. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-03344-6.
3
[Traumatic epiphysiolysis of the dens axis-a 10-year follow-up].[齿状突创伤性骨骺分离——10年随访]
Orthopadie (Heidelb). 2025 Aug;54(8):642-646. doi: 10.1007/s00132-025-04659-y. Epub 2025 May 14.
4
Convergent validity of 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) among people with neck pain.12项世界卫生组织残疾评定量表(WHODAS 2.0)在颈部疼痛患者中的收敛效度。
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 11;20(3):e0315676. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315676. eCollection 2025.
5
The Impact of Spine Injuries on Amateur Athletes: An Exploratory Analysis of Sport-Related Patient-Reported Outcomes.脊柱损伤对业余运动员的影响:一项关于与运动相关的患者报告结局的探索性分析。
Sports (Basel). 2024 Aug 1;12(8):213. doi: 10.3390/sports12080213.
6
Validation of the Cervical Torsion Test and Head-Neck Differentiation Test in Patients With Peripheral Vestibular Hypofunction.外周前庭功能减退患者的颈椎扭转试验和头颈部区分试验的验证。
Phys Ther. 2024 Jul 2;104(7). doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzae057.
7
Analysis of Clinical Pattern of Musculoskeletal Disorders in the Cervical and Cervico-Thoracic Regions of the Spine.脊柱颈段和颈胸段肌肉骨骼疾病临床模式分析
J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 1;13(3):840. doi: 10.3390/jcm13030840.
8
[Patient-reported outcome measures for assessing health-related quality of life in patients with voice and swallowing disorders].[用于评估嗓音和吞咽障碍患者健康相关生活质量的患者报告结局指标]
HNO. 2023 Sep;71(9):549-555. doi: 10.1007/s00106-023-01346-2. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
9
Validation of the German version of the STarT-MSK-Tool: A cohort study with patients from physiotherapy clinics.STarT-MSK 工具德语版的验证:来自物理治疗诊所患者的队列研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 1;17(7):e0269694. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269694. eCollection 2022.
10
The impact of endoscopic activity on musculoskeletal disorders of high-volume endoscopists in Germany.德国大容量内镜医师的内镜操作对肌肉骨骼疾病的影响。
Sci Rep. 2022 May 20;12(1):8538. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-12400-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Commentary on the article by Swanenburg et al. 'Validity and reliability of a German version of the Neck Disability Index (NDI-G)' [Man Ther Articles in Press http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2013.07.004].对斯瓦嫩堡等人所著文章《德语版颈部功能障碍指数(NDI-G)的有效性和可靠性》的评论[《手法治疗》待发表文章http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2013.07.004] 。
Man Ther. 2014 Feb;19(1):e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2013.10.007. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
2
Validity and reliability of a German version of the Neck Disability Index (NDI-G).德文版颈部功能障碍指数(NDI-G)的效度和信度。
Man Ther. 2014 Feb;19(1):52-8. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2013.07.004. Epub 2013 Aug 3.
3
Psychometric validation of the authorized Polish version of the Neck Disability Index.《颈痛疾患指数量表波兰语授权版的心理测量学验证》。
Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(25):2132-7. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2013.771706. Epub 2013 Apr 29.
4
Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Arabic version of neck disability index in patients with neck pain.颈部疼痛患者中阿拉伯文版颈部残疾指数的跨文化调适、信度和效度。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 May 1;38(10):E609-15. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828b2d09.
5
Yoga for chronic neck pain: a 12-month follow-up.瑜伽治疗慢性颈痛:为期 12 个月的随访研究。
Pain Med. 2013 Apr;14(4):541-8. doi: 10.1111/pme.12053. Epub 2013 Feb 6.
6
Randomized-controlled trial comparing yoga and home-based exercise for chronic neck pain.比较瑜伽和家庭运动治疗慢性颈痛的随机对照试验。
Clin J Pain. 2013 Mar;29(3):216-23. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e318251026c.
7
The contribution of previous episodes of pain, pain intensity, physical impairment, and pain-related fear to disability in patients with chronic mechanical neck pain.先前疼痛发作、疼痛强度、身体功能障碍以及与疼痛相关的恐惧对慢性机械性颈痛患者残疾的影响。
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Dec;91(12):1070-6. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31827449a5.
8
Yoga for chronic neck pain: a pilot randomized controlled clinical trial.瑜伽治疗慢性颈痛:一项初步随机对照临床试验。
J Pain. 2012 Nov;13(11):1122-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2012.08.004.
9
Crosscultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Japanese version of the neck disability index.《日本版颈痛疾患指数量表的跨文化调适、信度和效度》
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Oct 1;37(21):E1343-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318267f7f5.
10
Muscle trigger points, pressure pain threshold, and cervical range of motion in patients with high level of disability related to acute whiplash injury.肌肉激痛点、压痛阈和颈椎活动度在与急性挥鞭样损伤相关的高度残疾患者中的变化。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012 Jul;42(7):634-41. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2012.4117. Epub 2012 Jun 7.