Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Center for Rehabilitation, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, PO Box 30002, 9750 RA, Haren, The Netherlands.
Eur Spine J. 2012 Jan;21(1):93-100. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1920-5. Epub 2011 Aug 4.
To investigate the validity of the Neck Pain and Disability Scale Dutch Language Version (NPAD-DLV) and the Neck Disability Index (NDI)-DLV.
NPAD-DLV, NDI-DLV, Short-Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36)-DLV, visual analog scale (VAS)(pain) and VAS(disability) were administered to 112 patients with non-specific chronic neck pain in an outpatient tertiary rehabilitation setting. Twenty seven hypotheses were formulated regarding validity. NPAD-DLV and NDI-DLV were evaluated for content validity (normal distribution total scores, missing items, floor and ceiling effects), internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha and Spearman Item-total correlations), construct validity (Pearson correlations with SF-36 domains, VAS(pain) and VAS(disability) and Pearson correlation between total scores of NPAD-DLV and NDI-DLV).
NPAD-DLV and NDI-DLV scores were distributed normally. Missing items were negligible. Floor and ceiling effects were absent in NPAD-DLV and in NDI-DLV two items had floor effects and one item had a ceiling effect. Cronbach's alpha of NPAD-DLV was 0.93 and of NDI-DLV 0.83. Item-total correlations ranged for NPAD-DLV from 0.45 to 0.73 and for NDI-DLV from 0.40 to 0.64. The correlation between, respectively, NPAD-DLV and NDI-DLV and: SF-36 domains ranged from -0.36 to -0.70 and from -0.34 to -0.63; VAS(pain) was 0.54 and 0.43; VAS(disability) was 0.57 and 0.52. The correlation between the total scores of NPAD-DLV and NDI-DLV was 0.77. Twenty six hypotheses were not rejected and one hypothesis was rejected.
The NPAD-DLV and NDI-DLV are valid measures of self-reported neck-pain related disability.
研究荷兰语版颈部疼痛和残疾量表(NPAD-DLV)和颈部残疾指数(NDI-DLV)的有效性。
在门诊三级康复环境中,对 112 名非特异性慢性颈部疼痛患者进行 NPAD-DLV、NDI-DLV、36 项简明健康调查问卷(SF-36)-DLV、视觉模拟量表(疼痛)和视觉模拟量表(残疾)评估。共提出了 27 个关于有效性的假设。评估了 NPAD-DLV 和 NDI-DLV 的内容有效性(总分的正态分布、缺失项目、地板效应和天花板效应)、内部一致性(克朗巴赫的 alpha 和斯皮尔曼项目总分相关)、结构有效性(与 SF-36 域、VAS(疼痛)和 VAS(残疾)的 Pearson 相关性以及 NPAD-DLV 和 NDI-DLV 总分之间的 Pearson 相关性)。
NPAD-DLV 和 NDI-DLV 的评分呈正态分布。缺失项目很少。NPAD-DLV 无地板效应,NDI-DLV 有 2 个项目有地板效应,1 个项目有天花板效应。NPAD-DLV 的克朗巴赫的 alpha 为 0.93,NDI-DLV 的为 0.83。NPAD-DLV 的项目总分相关系数范围为 0.45 至 0.73,NDI-DLV 的为 0.40 至 0.64。NPAD-DLV 和 NDI-DLV 分别与:SF-36 域的相关性范围为-0.36 至-0.70 和-0.34 至-0.63;VAS(疼痛)为 0.54 和 0.43;VAS(残疾)为 0.57 和 0.52。NPAD-DLV 和 NDI-DLV 总分的相关性为 0.77。26 个假设未被拒绝,1 个假设被拒绝。
荷兰语版颈部疼痛和残疾量表(NPAD-DLV)和颈部残疾指数(NDI-DLV)是自我报告颈部疼痛相关残疾的有效测量工具。