Suppr超能文献

颈部疼痛和残疾量表及颈部残疾指数:荷兰语版本的效度。

Neck Pain and Disability Scale and Neck Disability Index: validity of Dutch language versions.

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Center for Rehabilitation, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, PO Box 30002, 9750 RA, Haren, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2012 Jan;21(1):93-100. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1920-5. Epub 2011 Aug 4.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate the validity of the Neck Pain and Disability Scale Dutch Language Version (NPAD-DLV) and the Neck Disability Index (NDI)-DLV.

METHODS

NPAD-DLV, NDI-DLV, Short-Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36)-DLV, visual analog scale (VAS)(pain) and VAS(disability) were administered to 112 patients with non-specific chronic neck pain in an outpatient tertiary rehabilitation setting. Twenty seven hypotheses were formulated regarding validity. NPAD-DLV and NDI-DLV were evaluated for content validity (normal distribution total scores, missing items, floor and ceiling effects), internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha and Spearman Item-total correlations), construct validity (Pearson correlations with SF-36 domains, VAS(pain) and VAS(disability) and Pearson correlation between total scores of NPAD-DLV and NDI-DLV).

RESULTS

NPAD-DLV and NDI-DLV scores were distributed normally. Missing items were negligible. Floor and ceiling effects were absent in NPAD-DLV and in NDI-DLV two items had floor effects and one item had a ceiling effect. Cronbach's alpha of NPAD-DLV was 0.93 and of NDI-DLV 0.83. Item-total correlations ranged for NPAD-DLV from 0.45 to 0.73 and for NDI-DLV from 0.40 to 0.64. The correlation between, respectively, NPAD-DLV and NDI-DLV and: SF-36 domains ranged from -0.36 to -0.70 and from -0.34 to -0.63; VAS(pain) was 0.54 and 0.43; VAS(disability) was 0.57 and 0.52. The correlation between the total scores of NPAD-DLV and NDI-DLV was 0.77. Twenty six hypotheses were not rejected and one hypothesis was rejected.

CONCLUSION

The NPAD-DLV and NDI-DLV are valid measures of self-reported neck-pain related disability.

摘要

目的

研究荷兰语版颈部疼痛和残疾量表(NPAD-DLV)和颈部残疾指数(NDI-DLV)的有效性。

方法

在门诊三级康复环境中,对 112 名非特异性慢性颈部疼痛患者进行 NPAD-DLV、NDI-DLV、36 项简明健康调查问卷(SF-36)-DLV、视觉模拟量表(疼痛)和视觉模拟量表(残疾)评估。共提出了 27 个关于有效性的假设。评估了 NPAD-DLV 和 NDI-DLV 的内容有效性(总分的正态分布、缺失项目、地板效应和天花板效应)、内部一致性(克朗巴赫的 alpha 和斯皮尔曼项目总分相关)、结构有效性(与 SF-36 域、VAS(疼痛)和 VAS(残疾)的 Pearson 相关性以及 NPAD-DLV 和 NDI-DLV 总分之间的 Pearson 相关性)。

结果

NPAD-DLV 和 NDI-DLV 的评分呈正态分布。缺失项目很少。NPAD-DLV 无地板效应,NDI-DLV 有 2 个项目有地板效应,1 个项目有天花板效应。NPAD-DLV 的克朗巴赫的 alpha 为 0.93,NDI-DLV 的为 0.83。NPAD-DLV 的项目总分相关系数范围为 0.45 至 0.73,NDI-DLV 的为 0.40 至 0.64。NPAD-DLV 和 NDI-DLV 分别与:SF-36 域的相关性范围为-0.36 至-0.70 和-0.34 至-0.63;VAS(疼痛)为 0.54 和 0.43;VAS(残疾)为 0.57 和 0.52。NPAD-DLV 和 NDI-DLV 总分的相关性为 0.77。26 个假设未被拒绝,1 个假设被拒绝。

结论

荷兰语版颈部疼痛和残疾量表(NPAD-DLV)和颈部残疾指数(NDI-DLV)是自我报告颈部疼痛相关残疾的有效测量工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53ae/3252449/31f896bf7f1b/586_2011_1920_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验