Suppr超能文献

支持和姑息治疗需求的整体评估:常规系统询问的证据。

Holistic assessment of supportive and palliative care needs: the evidence for routine systematic questioning.

机构信息

Academic Unit of Supportive Care, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

Faculty of Health and Wellbeing, Sheffield Hallam University, Montgomery House, Sheffield, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2014 Sep;4(3):238-46. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2012-000324. Epub 2014 Jan 10.

Abstract

There is evidence to suggest that patients with cancer and other non-malignant chronic progressive illnesses can experience distressing symptoms, or concerns, which can often remain unrecognised. There is little disagreement that routine systematic questioning is useful in identifying supportive or palliative care needs that would otherwise not be identified. The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of holistic needs assessment in the fields of supportive and palliative care and to present evidence of the value of routine systematic questioning. Systematic questioning allows needs to be identified and addressed. There is at present no standardised systematic, evidence-based holistic approach to screening patients for supportive and palliative care needs.

摘要

有证据表明,患有癌症和其他非恶性慢性进行性疾病的患者可能会出现痛苦的症状或担忧,但这些症状或担忧往往未被识别。人们几乎一致认为,常规的系统询问有助于识别支持性或姑息治疗需求,如果不进行常规系统询问,这些需求可能无法被识别。本文旨在概述支持性和姑息治疗领域的整体需求评估,并提供常规系统询问价值的证据。系统询问可以帮助识别和解决需求。目前,尚无标准化的系统、基于证据的整体方法来筛查患者的支持性和姑息治疗需求。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验