• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

先前所学策略对在石头剪刀布游戏中更新对手策略的影响。

The effects of prior learned strategies on updating an opponent's strategy in the rock, paper, scissors game.

作者信息

Stöttinger Elisabeth, Filipowicz Alex, Danckert James, Anderson Britt

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo.

出版信息

Cogn Sci. 2014 Sep-Oct;38(7):1482-92. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12115. Epub 2014 Mar 19.

DOI:10.1111/cogs.12115
PMID:24646145
Abstract

To explore how model building adapts to changing environments, we had participants play "rock-paper-scissors" against a computer that played a frequency bias or a player-dependent bias and then switched. Participants demonstrated their use of prior experience in how quickly they recognized and exploited changes in the computer's play strategy; in general, the more similar the strategies, the more efficient the updating. These findings inform our understanding of previously reported updating impairments in right-brain damaged patients.

摘要

为了探究模型构建如何适应不断变化的环境,我们让参与者与一台计算机玩“石头剪刀布”游戏,这台计算机采用频率偏差或玩家依赖偏差,然后进行切换。参与者在识别和利用计算机游戏策略变化的速度方面展示了他们对先前经验的运用;一般来说,策略越相似,更新效率越高。这些发现有助于我们理解先前报道的右脑损伤患者的更新障碍。

相似文献

1
The effects of prior learned strategies on updating an opponent's strategy in the rock, paper, scissors game.先前所学策略对在石头剪刀布游戏中更新对手策略的影响。
Cogn Sci. 2014 Sep-Oct;38(7):1482-92. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12115. Epub 2014 Mar 19.
2
Right hemisphere brain damage impairs strategy updating.右侧大脑半球损伤会损害策略更新。
Cereb Cortex. 2012 Dec;22(12):2745-60. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhr351. Epub 2011 Dec 15.
3
Learning what from where: Effects of spatial regularity on nonspatial sequence learning and updating.从何处学习什么:空间规律性对非空间序列学习与更新的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014;67(7):1447-56. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.867518. Epub 2014 Jan 14.
4
Concurrent performance in a three-alternative choice situation: response allocation in a Rock/Paper/Scissors game.三选一情境中的并发表现:石头/剪刀/布游戏中的反应分配
Behav Processes. 2009 Oct;82(2):164-72. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2009.06.004. Epub 2009 Jun 23.
5
Learning and decision making in monkeys during a rock-paper-scissors game.猴子在玩剪刀石头布游戏时的学习与决策
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 Oct;25(2):416-30. doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.07.003. Epub 2005 Aug 10.
6
Chaos in learning a simple two-person game.学习一个简单的两人游戏时的混乱状态。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Apr 2;99(7):4748-51. doi: 10.1073/pnas.032086299.
7
Flexibility of theory of mind in a matrix game when the opponent's level changes.当对手水平变化时矩阵博弈中心理理论的灵活性
Am J Psychol. 2014 Spring;127(1):75-85. doi: 10.5406/amerjpsyc.127.1.0075.
8
Response randomization of one- and two-person rock-paper-scissors games in individuals with schizophrenia.精神分裂症个体中单人及双人猜拳游戏的反应随机化。
Psychiatry Res. 2013 May 30;207(3):158-63. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2012.09.003. Epub 2012 Sep 25.
9
An experimental investigation of evolutionary dynamics in the Rock-Paper-Scissors game.“剪刀-石头-布”游戏中进化动力学的实验研究。
Sci Rep. 2015 Mar 6;5:8817. doi: 10.1038/srep08817.
10
The effect of opponent type on human performance in a three-alternative choice task.对手类型对三项选择任务中人类表现的影响。
Behav Processes. 2013 Oct;99:87-94. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2013.07.005. Epub 2013 Jul 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Deviation from Nash mixed equilibrium in repeated rock-scissors-paper reflect individual traits.在重复的石头剪刀布游戏中偏离纳什混合均衡反映了个体特征。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 29;15(1):14955. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-95444-6.
2
Variability in competitive decision-making speed and quality against exploiting and exploitative opponents.针对利用型和剥削型对手,竞争决策速度和质量的可变性。
Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 3;11(1):2859. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82269-2.
3
Statistical Learning Impairments as a Consequence of Stroke.中风导致的统计学习障碍
Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Aug 28;12:339. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00339. eCollection 2018.
4
Sequential decisions: a computational comparison of observational and reinforcement accounts.序列决策:观察性与强化性解释的计算比较
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 18;9(4):e94308. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094308. eCollection 2014.
5
Statistical and perceptual updating: correlated impairments in right brain injury.统计与知觉更新:右脑损伤中的相关损害
Exp Brain Res. 2014 Jun;232(6):1971-87. doi: 10.1007/s00221-014-3887-z. Epub 2014 Mar 11.